Cargando…
The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7 |
_version_ | 1783232847336701952 |
---|---|
author | El-Shater Bosaily, A Valerio, M Hu, Y Freeman, A Jameson, C Brown, L Kaplan, R Hindley, R G Barratt, D Emberton, M Ahmed, H U |
author_facet | El-Shater Bosaily, A Valerio, M Hu, Y Freeman, A Jameson, C Brown, L Kaplan, R Hindley, R G Barratt, D Emberton, M Ahmed, H U |
author_sort | El-Shater Bosaily, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume hotspot) of a prostate cancer lesion. METHODS: 3-D histopathological models were reconstructed using the outputs of the 5-mm transperineal mapping (TPM) biopsies used as the reference test in the pilot phase of Prostate Mri Imaging Study (PROMIS), a paired validating cohort study investigating the performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies. The prostate was fully sampled with 5 mm intervals; each core was separately labelled, inked and orientated in space to register 3-D cancer lesions location. The data from the histopathology results were used to create a 3-D interpolated reconstruction of each lesion and identify the spatial coordinates of the largest dimension (volume hot spot) and highest Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) and assess their concordance. RESULTS: Ninety-four men, with median age 62 years (interquartile range, IQR= 58–68) and median PSA 6.5 ng ml(−1) (4.6–8.8), had a median of 80 (I69–89) cores each with a median of 4.5 positive cores (0–12). In the primary analysis, the prevalence of homogeneous lesions was 148 (76% 95% confidence interval (CI) ±6.0%). In all, 184 (94±3.2%) lesions showed concordant hotspots and 11/47 (23±12.1%) of heterogeneous lesions showed discordant hotspots. The median 3-D distance between discordant hotspots was 12.8 mm (9.9–15.5). These figures remained stable on secondary analyses using alternative reconstructive assumptions. Limitations include a certain degree of error within reconstructed models. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding one biopsy needle to the maximum cancer diameter would lead to correct Gleason grade attribution in 94% of all lesions and 79% of heterogeneous ones if a true hit was obtained. Further correlation of histological lesions, their MRI appearance and the detectability of these hotspots on MRI will be undertaken once PROMIS results are released. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5411671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54116712017-05-15 The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial El-Shater Bosaily, A Valerio, M Hu, Y Freeman, A Jameson, C Brown, L Kaplan, R Hindley, R G Barratt, D Emberton, M Ahmed, H U Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Original Article OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume hotspot) of a prostate cancer lesion. METHODS: 3-D histopathological models were reconstructed using the outputs of the 5-mm transperineal mapping (TPM) biopsies used as the reference test in the pilot phase of Prostate Mri Imaging Study (PROMIS), a paired validating cohort study investigating the performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies. The prostate was fully sampled with 5 mm intervals; each core was separately labelled, inked and orientated in space to register 3-D cancer lesions location. The data from the histopathology results were used to create a 3-D interpolated reconstruction of each lesion and identify the spatial coordinates of the largest dimension (volume hot spot) and highest Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) and assess their concordance. RESULTS: Ninety-four men, with median age 62 years (interquartile range, IQR= 58–68) and median PSA 6.5 ng ml(−1) (4.6–8.8), had a median of 80 (I69–89) cores each with a median of 4.5 positive cores (0–12). In the primary analysis, the prevalence of homogeneous lesions was 148 (76% 95% confidence interval (CI) ±6.0%). In all, 184 (94±3.2%) lesions showed concordant hotspots and 11/47 (23±12.1%) of heterogeneous lesions showed discordant hotspots. The median 3-D distance between discordant hotspots was 12.8 mm (9.9–15.5). These figures remained stable on secondary analyses using alternative reconstructive assumptions. Limitations include a certain degree of error within reconstructed models. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding one biopsy needle to the maximum cancer diameter would lead to correct Gleason grade attribution in 94% of all lesions and 79% of heterogeneous ones if a true hit was obtained. Further correlation of histological lesions, their MRI appearance and the detectability of these hotspots on MRI will be undertaken once PROMIS results are released. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5411671/ /pubmed/27401032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article El-Shater Bosaily, A Valerio, M Hu, Y Freeman, A Jameson, C Brown, L Kaplan, R Hindley, R G Barratt, D Emberton, M Ahmed, H U The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title | The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title_full | The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title_fullStr | The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title_short | The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial |
title_sort | concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-d reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the promis trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elshaterbosailya theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT valeriom theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT huy theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT freemana theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT jamesonc theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT brownl theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT kaplanr theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT hindleyrg theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT barrattd theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT embertonm theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT ahmedhu theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT elshaterbosailya concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT valeriom concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT huy concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT freemana concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT jamesonc concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT brownl concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT kaplanr concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT hindleyrg concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT barrattd concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT embertonm concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial AT ahmedhu concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial |