Cargando…

The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial

OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Shater Bosaily, A, Valerio, M, Hu, Y, Freeman, A, Jameson, C, Brown, L, Kaplan, R, Hindley, R G, Barratt, D, Emberton, M, Ahmed, H U
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7
_version_ 1783232847336701952
author El-Shater Bosaily, A
Valerio, M
Hu, Y
Freeman, A
Jameson, C
Brown, L
Kaplan, R
Hindley, R G
Barratt, D
Emberton, M
Ahmed, H U
author_facet El-Shater Bosaily, A
Valerio, M
Hu, Y
Freeman, A
Jameson, C
Brown, L
Kaplan, R
Hindley, R G
Barratt, D
Emberton, M
Ahmed, H U
author_sort El-Shater Bosaily, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume hotspot) of a prostate cancer lesion. METHODS: 3-D histopathological models were reconstructed using the outputs of the 5-mm transperineal mapping (TPM) biopsies used as the reference test in the pilot phase of Prostate Mri Imaging Study (PROMIS), a paired validating cohort study investigating the performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies. The prostate was fully sampled with 5 mm intervals; each core was separately labelled, inked and orientated in space to register 3-D cancer lesions location. The data from the histopathology results were used to create a 3-D interpolated reconstruction of each lesion and identify the spatial coordinates of the largest dimension (volume hot spot) and highest Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) and assess their concordance. RESULTS: Ninety-four men, with median age 62 years (interquartile range, IQR= 58–68) and median PSA 6.5 ng ml(−1) (4.6–8.8), had a median of 80 (I69–89) cores each with a median of 4.5 positive cores (0–12). In the primary analysis, the prevalence of homogeneous lesions was 148 (76% 95% confidence interval (CI) ±6.0%). In all, 184 (94±3.2%) lesions showed concordant hotspots and 11/47 (23±12.1%) of heterogeneous lesions showed discordant hotspots. The median 3-D distance between discordant hotspots was 12.8 mm (9.9–15.5). These figures remained stable on secondary analyses using alternative reconstructive assumptions. Limitations include a certain degree of error within reconstructed models. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding one biopsy needle to the maximum cancer diameter would lead to correct Gleason grade attribution in 94% of all lesions and 79% of heterogeneous ones if a true hit was obtained. Further correlation of histological lesions, their MRI appearance and the detectability of these hotspots on MRI will be undertaken once PROMIS results are released.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5411671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54116712017-05-15 The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial El-Shater Bosaily, A Valerio, M Hu, Y Freeman, A Jameson, C Brown, L Kaplan, R Hindley, R G Barratt, D Emberton, M Ahmed, H U Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Original Article OBJECTIVES: The rationale for directing targeted biopsy towards the centre of lesions has been questioned in light of prostate cancer grade heterogeneity. In this study, we assess the assumption that the maximum cancer Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) lies within the maximum dimension (volume hotspot) of a prostate cancer lesion. METHODS: 3-D histopathological models were reconstructed using the outputs of the 5-mm transperineal mapping (TPM) biopsies used as the reference test in the pilot phase of Prostate Mri Imaging Study (PROMIS), a paired validating cohort study investigating the performance of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies. The prostate was fully sampled with 5 mm intervals; each core was separately labelled, inked and orientated in space to register 3-D cancer lesions location. The data from the histopathology results were used to create a 3-D interpolated reconstruction of each lesion and identify the spatial coordinates of the largest dimension (volume hot spot) and highest Gleason grade (Gleason grade hotspot) and assess their concordance. RESULTS: Ninety-four men, with median age 62 years (interquartile range, IQR= 58–68) and median PSA 6.5 ng ml(−1) (4.6–8.8), had a median of 80 (I69–89) cores each with a median of 4.5 positive cores (0–12). In the primary analysis, the prevalence of homogeneous lesions was 148 (76% 95% confidence interval (CI) ±6.0%). In all, 184 (94±3.2%) lesions showed concordant hotspots and 11/47 (23±12.1%) of heterogeneous lesions showed discordant hotspots. The median 3-D distance between discordant hotspots was 12.8 mm (9.9–15.5). These figures remained stable on secondary analyses using alternative reconstructive assumptions. Limitations include a certain degree of error within reconstructed models. CONCLUSIONS: Guiding one biopsy needle to the maximum cancer diameter would lead to correct Gleason grade attribution in 94% of all lesions and 79% of heterogeneous ones if a true hit was obtained. Further correlation of histological lesions, their MRI appearance and the detectability of these hotspots on MRI will be undertaken once PROMIS results are released. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5411671/ /pubmed/27401032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7 Text en Copyright © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
El-Shater Bosaily, A
Valerio, M
Hu, Y
Freeman, A
Jameson, C
Brown, L
Kaplan, R
Hindley, R G
Barratt, D
Emberton, M
Ahmed, H U
The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title_full The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title_fullStr The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title_full_unstemmed The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title_short The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial
title_sort concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-d reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the promis trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.7
work_keys_str_mv AT elshaterbosailya theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT valeriom theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT huy theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT freemana theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT jamesonc theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT brownl theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT kaplanr theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT hindleyrg theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT barrattd theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT embertonm theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT ahmedhu theconcordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT elshaterbosailya concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT valeriom concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT huy concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT freemana concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT jamesonc concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT brownl concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT kaplanr concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT hindleyrg concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT barrattd concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT embertonm concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial
AT ahmedhu concordancebetweenthevolumehotspotandthegradehotspota3dreconstructivemodelusingthepathologyoutputsfromthepromistrial