Cargando…

Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds

One of the major challenges in the development of alternative carcinogenicity assays is the prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogens. The variety of non-genotoxic cancer pathways complicates the search for reliable parameters expressing their carcinogenicity. As non-genotoxic and genotoxic carcinogen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, An-Sofie, Willems, Maxime, Plusquin, Michelle, Ploem, Jan-Pieter, Winckelmans, Ellen, Artois, Tom, Smeets, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep45616
_version_ 1783233252550508544
author Stevens, An-Sofie
Willems, Maxime
Plusquin, Michelle
Ploem, Jan-Pieter
Winckelmans, Ellen
Artois, Tom
Smeets, Karen
author_facet Stevens, An-Sofie
Willems, Maxime
Plusquin, Michelle
Ploem, Jan-Pieter
Winckelmans, Ellen
Artois, Tom
Smeets, Karen
author_sort Stevens, An-Sofie
collection PubMed
description One of the major challenges in the development of alternative carcinogenicity assays is the prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogens. The variety of non-genotoxic cancer pathways complicates the search for reliable parameters expressing their carcinogenicity. As non-genotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens have different cancer risks, the objective of this study was to develop a concept for an in vivo test, based on flatworm stem cell dynamics, to detect and classify carcinogenic compounds. Our methodology entails an exposure to carcinogenic compounds during the animal’s regeneration process, which revealed differences in proliferative responses between non-genotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens during the initial stages of the regeneration process. A proof of concept was obtained after an extensive study of proliferation dynamics of a genotoxic and a non-genotoxic compound. A pilot validation with a limited set of compounds showed that the proposed concept not only enabled a simple prediction of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, but also had the power to discriminate between both. We further optimized this discrimination by combining stem cell proliferation responses with a phenotypic screening and by using specific knockdowns. In the future, more compounds will be tested to further validate and prove this concept.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5413882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54138822017-05-03 Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds Stevens, An-Sofie Willems, Maxime Plusquin, Michelle Ploem, Jan-Pieter Winckelmans, Ellen Artois, Tom Smeets, Karen Sci Rep Article One of the major challenges in the development of alternative carcinogenicity assays is the prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogens. The variety of non-genotoxic cancer pathways complicates the search for reliable parameters expressing their carcinogenicity. As non-genotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens have different cancer risks, the objective of this study was to develop a concept for an in vivo test, based on flatworm stem cell dynamics, to detect and classify carcinogenic compounds. Our methodology entails an exposure to carcinogenic compounds during the animal’s regeneration process, which revealed differences in proliferative responses between non-genotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens during the initial stages of the regeneration process. A proof of concept was obtained after an extensive study of proliferation dynamics of a genotoxic and a non-genotoxic compound. A pilot validation with a limited set of compounds showed that the proposed concept not only enabled a simple prediction of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, but also had the power to discriminate between both. We further optimized this discrimination by combining stem cell proliferation responses with a phenotypic screening and by using specific knockdowns. In the future, more compounds will be tested to further validate and prove this concept. Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5413882/ /pubmed/28466856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep45616 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Stevens, An-Sofie
Willems, Maxime
Plusquin, Michelle
Ploem, Jan-Pieter
Winckelmans, Ellen
Artois, Tom
Smeets, Karen
Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title_full Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title_fullStr Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title_full_unstemmed Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title_short Stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
title_sort stem cell proliferation patterns as an alternative for in vivo prediction and discrimination of carcinogenic compounds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep45616
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensansofie stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT willemsmaxime stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT plusquinmichelle stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT ploemjanpieter stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT winckelmansellen stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT artoistom stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds
AT smeetskaren stemcellproliferationpatternsasanalternativeforinvivopredictionanddiscriminationofcarcinogeniccompounds