Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening

Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures. Here we derive a new analytical expression for predicting the bending moment for tangential cracking, and compare the breaking moment of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yan-San, Hsu, Fu-Lan, Lee, Chin-Mei, Juang, Jia-Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28484616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160972
_version_ 1783233333920006144
author Huang, Yan-San
Hsu, Fu-Lan
Lee, Chin-Mei
Juang, Jia-Yang
author_facet Huang, Yan-San
Hsu, Fu-Lan
Lee, Chin-Mei
Juang, Jia-Yang
author_sort Huang, Yan-San
collection PubMed
description Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures. Here we derive a new analytical expression for predicting the bending moment for tangential cracking, and compare the breaking moment of various failure modes, including Brazier buckling, tangential cracking, shear failure and conventional bending failure, as a function of t/R ratio, where t and R are the trunk wall thickness and trunk radius, respectively, of a hollow tree. We use Taiwan red cypress as an example and show that its failure modes and the corresponding t/R ratios are: Brazier buckling (Mode I), tangential cracking followed by longitudinal splitting (Mode II) and conventional bending failure (Mode III) for 0 < t/R < 0.06, 0.06 < t/R < 0.27 and 0.27 < t/R < 1, respectively. The exact values of those ratios may vary within and among species, but the variation is much smaller than individual mechanical properties. Also, shear failure, another type of cracking due to maximum shear stress near the neutral axis of the tree trunk, is unlikely to occur since it requires much larger bending moments. Hence, we conclude that tangential cracking due to cross-sectional flattening, followed by longitudinal splitting, is dominant for hollow trunks. Our equations are applicable to analyse straight hollow tree trunks and plant stems, but are not applicable to those with side openings or those with only heart decay. Our findings provide insights for those managing trees in urban situations and those managing for conservation of hollow-dependent fauna in both urban and rural settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5414253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54142532017-05-08 Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening Huang, Yan-San Hsu, Fu-Lan Lee, Chin-Mei Juang, Jia-Yang R Soc Open Sci Biochemistry and Biophysics Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures. Here we derive a new analytical expression for predicting the bending moment for tangential cracking, and compare the breaking moment of various failure modes, including Brazier buckling, tangential cracking, shear failure and conventional bending failure, as a function of t/R ratio, where t and R are the trunk wall thickness and trunk radius, respectively, of a hollow tree. We use Taiwan red cypress as an example and show that its failure modes and the corresponding t/R ratios are: Brazier buckling (Mode I), tangential cracking followed by longitudinal splitting (Mode II) and conventional bending failure (Mode III) for 0 < t/R < 0.06, 0.06 < t/R < 0.27 and 0.27 < t/R < 1, respectively. The exact values of those ratios may vary within and among species, but the variation is much smaller than individual mechanical properties. Also, shear failure, another type of cracking due to maximum shear stress near the neutral axis of the tree trunk, is unlikely to occur since it requires much larger bending moments. Hence, we conclude that tangential cracking due to cross-sectional flattening, followed by longitudinal splitting, is dominant for hollow trunks. Our equations are applicable to analyse straight hollow tree trunks and plant stems, but are not applicable to those with side openings or those with only heart decay. Our findings provide insights for those managing trees in urban situations and those managing for conservation of hollow-dependent fauna in both urban and rural settings. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5414253/ /pubmed/28484616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160972 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biochemistry and Biophysics
Huang, Yan-San
Hsu, Fu-Lan
Lee, Chin-Mei
Juang, Jia-Yang
Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title_full Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title_fullStr Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title_full_unstemmed Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title_short Failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
title_sort failure mechanism of hollow tree trunks due to cross-sectional flattening
topic Biochemistry and Biophysics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28484616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160972
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyansan failuremechanismofhollowtreetrunksduetocrosssectionalflattening
AT hsufulan failuremechanismofhollowtreetrunksduetocrosssectionalflattening
AT leechinmei failuremechanismofhollowtreetrunksduetocrosssectionalflattening
AT juangjiayang failuremechanismofhollowtreetrunksduetocrosssectionalflattening