Cargando…
Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091 |
_version_ | 1783234563434086400 |
---|---|
author | Gittman, Rachel K. Scyphers, Steven B. Smith, Carter S. Neylan, Isabelle P. Grabowski, Jonathan H. |
author_facet | Gittman, Rachel K. Scyphers, Steven B. Smith, Carter S. Neylan, Isabelle P. Grabowski, Jonathan H. |
author_sort | Gittman, Rachel K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely on, but the amount of hardened coastline continues to grow in many ecologically important coastal regions. Therefore, to inform future management decisions, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the ecosystem services of biodiversity (richness or diversity) and habitat provisioning (organism abundance) along shorelines with versus without engineered-shore structures. Seawalls supported 23% lower biodiversity and 45% fewer organisms than natural shorelines. In contrast, biodiversity and abundance supported by riprap or breakwater shorelines were not different from natural shorelines; however, effect sizes were highly heterogeneous across organism groups and studies. As coastal development increases, the type and location of shoreline hardening could greatly affect the habitat value and functioning of nearshore ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5421310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54213102017-05-22 Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis Gittman, Rachel K. Scyphers, Steven B. Smith, Carter S. Neylan, Isabelle P. Grabowski, Jonathan H. Bioscience Overview Articles Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely on, but the amount of hardened coastline continues to grow in many ecologically important coastal regions. Therefore, to inform future management decisions, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the ecosystem services of biodiversity (richness or diversity) and habitat provisioning (organism abundance) along shorelines with versus without engineered-shore structures. Seawalls supported 23% lower biodiversity and 45% fewer organisms than natural shorelines. In contrast, biodiversity and abundance supported by riprap or breakwater shorelines were not different from natural shorelines; however, effect sizes were highly heterogeneous across organism groups and studies. As coastal development increases, the type and location of shoreline hardening could greatly affect the habitat value and functioning of nearshore ecosystems. Oxford University Press 2016-09-01 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5421310/ /pubmed/28533564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Overview Articles Gittman, Rachel K. Scyphers, Steven B. Smith, Carter S. Neylan, Isabelle P. Grabowski, Jonathan H. Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | ecological consequences of shoreline hardening: a meta-analysis |
topic | Overview Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gittmanrachelk ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis AT scyphersstevenb ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis AT smithcarters ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis AT neylanisabellep ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis AT grabowskijonathanh ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis |