Cargando…

Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis

Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gittman, Rachel K., Scyphers, Steven B., Smith, Carter S., Neylan, Isabelle P., Grabowski, Jonathan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091
_version_ 1783234563434086400
author Gittman, Rachel K.
Scyphers, Steven B.
Smith, Carter S.
Neylan, Isabelle P.
Grabowski, Jonathan H.
author_facet Gittman, Rachel K.
Scyphers, Steven B.
Smith, Carter S.
Neylan, Isabelle P.
Grabowski, Jonathan H.
author_sort Gittman, Rachel K.
collection PubMed
description Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely on, but the amount of hardened coastline continues to grow in many ecologically important coastal regions. Therefore, to inform future management decisions, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the ecosystem services of biodiversity (richness or diversity) and habitat provisioning (organism abundance) along shorelines with versus without engineered-shore structures. Seawalls supported 23% lower biodiversity and 45% fewer organisms than natural shorelines. In contrast, biodiversity and abundance supported by riprap or breakwater shorelines were not different from natural shorelines; however, effect sizes were highly heterogeneous across organism groups and studies. As coastal development increases, the type and location of shoreline hardening could greatly affect the habitat value and functioning of nearshore ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5421310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54213102017-05-22 Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis Gittman, Rachel K. Scyphers, Steven B. Smith, Carter S. Neylan, Isabelle P. Grabowski, Jonathan H. Bioscience Overview Articles Protecting coastal communities has become increasingly important as their populations grow, resulting in increased demand for engineered shore protection and hardening of over 50% of many urban shorelines. Shoreline hardening is recognized to reduce ecosystem services that coastal populations rely on, but the amount of hardened coastline continues to grow in many ecologically important coastal regions. Therefore, to inform future management decisions, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing the ecosystem services of biodiversity (richness or diversity) and habitat provisioning (organism abundance) along shorelines with versus without engineered-shore structures. Seawalls supported 23% lower biodiversity and 45% fewer organisms than natural shorelines. In contrast, biodiversity and abundance supported by riprap or breakwater shorelines were not different from natural shorelines; however, effect sizes were highly heterogeneous across organism groups and studies. As coastal development increases, the type and location of shoreline hardening could greatly affect the habitat value and functioning of nearshore ecosystems. Oxford University Press 2016-09-01 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5421310/ /pubmed/28533564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Overview Articles
Gittman, Rachel K.
Scyphers, Steven B.
Smith, Carter S.
Neylan, Isabelle P.
Grabowski, Jonathan H.
Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort ecological consequences of shoreline hardening: a meta-analysis
topic Overview Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw091
work_keys_str_mv AT gittmanrachelk ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis
AT scyphersstevenb ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis
AT smithcarters ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis
AT neylanisabellep ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis
AT grabowskijonathanh ecologicalconsequencesofshorelinehardeningametaanalysis