Cargando…

The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND: The Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability took the South African Government to court in 2010 on its failure to implement the right to education for Children with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability. Subsequently, multidisciplinary teams were appointed by the Western Cape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spangenberg, Karlien, Corten, Lieselotte, van Rensburg, Winnie, Kilian, Elizma, McKenzie, Judith, Vorster, Hein, Jelsma, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v5i1.237
_version_ 1783236859294384128
author Spangenberg, Karlien
Corten, Lieselotte
van Rensburg, Winnie
Kilian, Elizma
McKenzie, Judith
Vorster, Hein
Jelsma, Jennifer
author_facet Spangenberg, Karlien
Corten, Lieselotte
van Rensburg, Winnie
Kilian, Elizma
McKenzie, Judith
Vorster, Hein
Jelsma, Jennifer
author_sort Spangenberg, Karlien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability took the South African Government to court in 2010 on its failure to implement the right to education for Children with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability. Subsequently, multidisciplinary teams were appointed by the Western Cape Education Department to deliver services to the Special Care Centres (SCCs). Initially, minimal information was available on this population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to document the process of developing and validating a database for the collection of routine data. METHOD: A descriptive analytical study design was used. A sample of convenience was drawn from individuals under the age of 18 years, enrolled in SCCs in the Western Cape. The team who entered and analysed the data reached consensus regarding the utility and feasibility of each item. RESULTS: Data were collected on 134 children. The omission of certain items from the database was identified. Some information was not reliable or readily available. Of the instruments identified to assess function, the classification systems were found to be reliable and useful, as were the performance scales. The WeeFIM, on the other hand, was lengthy and expensive, and was therefore discarded. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A list of items to be included was identified. Apart from an individual profile, it can be useful for service planning and monitoring, if incorporated into the central information system used to monitor the performance of all children. Without such inclusion, this most vulnerable population, despite court ruling, will not have their right to education adequately addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54334602017-07-20 The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities Spangenberg, Karlien Corten, Lieselotte van Rensburg, Winnie Kilian, Elizma McKenzie, Judith Vorster, Hein Jelsma, Jennifer Afr J Disabil Original Research BACKGROUND: The Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability took the South African Government to court in 2010 on its failure to implement the right to education for Children with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability. Subsequently, multidisciplinary teams were appointed by the Western Cape Education Department to deliver services to the Special Care Centres (SCCs). Initially, minimal information was available on this population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to document the process of developing and validating a database for the collection of routine data. METHOD: A descriptive analytical study design was used. A sample of convenience was drawn from individuals under the age of 18 years, enrolled in SCCs in the Western Cape. The team who entered and analysed the data reached consensus regarding the utility and feasibility of each item. RESULTS: Data were collected on 134 children. The omission of certain items from the database was identified. Some information was not reliable or readily available. Of the instruments identified to assess function, the classification systems were found to be reliable and useful, as were the performance scales. The WeeFIM, on the other hand, was lengthy and expensive, and was therefore discarded. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A list of items to be included was identified. Apart from an individual profile, it can be useful for service planning and monitoring, if incorporated into the central information system used to monitor the performance of all children. Without such inclusion, this most vulnerable population, despite court ruling, will not have their right to education adequately addressed. AOSIS 2016-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5433460/ /pubmed/28730055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v5i1.237 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Spangenberg, Karlien
Corten, Lieselotte
van Rensburg, Winnie
Kilian, Elizma
McKenzie, Judith
Vorster, Hein
Jelsma, Jennifer
The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title_full The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title_fullStr The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title_full_unstemmed The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title_short The validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
title_sort validation of an educational database for children with profound intellectual disabilities
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v5i1.237
work_keys_str_mv AT spangenbergkarlien thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT cortenlieselotte thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT vanrensburgwinnie thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT kilianelizma thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT mckenziejudith thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT vorsterhein thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT jelsmajennifer thevalidationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT spangenbergkarlien validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT cortenlieselotte validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT vanrensburgwinnie validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT kilianelizma validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT mckenziejudith validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT vorsterhein validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities
AT jelsmajennifer validationofaneducationaldatabaseforchildrenwithprofoundintellectualdisabilities