Cargando…
Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective
Prior research suggests that interviewers play an important role in representing their organization and in making the interview a pleasant experience for applicants. This study examined whether impression management used by interviewers (organization-enhancement and applicant-enhancement) is perceiv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740 |
_version_ | 1783239237977505792 |
---|---|
author | Wilhelmy, Annika Kleinmann, Martin Melchers, Klaus G. Götz, Martin |
author_facet | Wilhelmy, Annika Kleinmann, Martin Melchers, Klaus G. Götz, Martin |
author_sort | Wilhelmy, Annika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior research suggests that interviewers play an important role in representing their organization and in making the interview a pleasant experience for applicants. This study examined whether impression management used by interviewers (organization-enhancement and applicant-enhancement) is perceived by applicants, and how it influences applicants' attitudes, intentions, and emotions. Adopting a signaling perspective, this article argues that applicants' positive attitudes and intentions toward the organization increase if interviewers not only enhance the organization, but if the signals they sent (i.e., organization-enhancement) are actually received by the applicant. Similarly, applicants' positive emotions should increase if interviewers not only enhance the applicant, but if the signals they send (i.e., applicant-enhancement) are actually received by the applicant. A field study that involved video coding interviewers' impression management behavior during 153 selection interviews and pre- and post-interview applicant surveys showed that the signals sent by interviewers during the interview were received by applicants. In addition, applicants rated the organization's prestige and their own positive affect after the interview more positively when they perceived higher levels of organization-enhancement during the interview. Furthermore, applicants reported more positive affect and interview self-efficacy after the interview when they perceived higher levels of interviewer applicant-enhancement. We also found an indirect effect of interviewers' organization-enhancement on organizational prestige through applicants' perceptions of organization-enhancement as well as indirect effects of interviewers' applicant-enhancement on applicants' positive affect and interview self-efficacy through applicants' perceptions of applicant-enhancement. Our findings contribute to an integrated understanding of the effects of interviewer impression management and point out both risks and chances in selling and smooth-talking toward applicants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5447071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54470712017-06-13 Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective Wilhelmy, Annika Kleinmann, Martin Melchers, Klaus G. Götz, Martin Front Psychol Psychology Prior research suggests that interviewers play an important role in representing their organization and in making the interview a pleasant experience for applicants. This study examined whether impression management used by interviewers (organization-enhancement and applicant-enhancement) is perceived by applicants, and how it influences applicants' attitudes, intentions, and emotions. Adopting a signaling perspective, this article argues that applicants' positive attitudes and intentions toward the organization increase if interviewers not only enhance the organization, but if the signals they sent (i.e., organization-enhancement) are actually received by the applicant. Similarly, applicants' positive emotions should increase if interviewers not only enhance the applicant, but if the signals they send (i.e., applicant-enhancement) are actually received by the applicant. A field study that involved video coding interviewers' impression management behavior during 153 selection interviews and pre- and post-interview applicant surveys showed that the signals sent by interviewers during the interview were received by applicants. In addition, applicants rated the organization's prestige and their own positive affect after the interview more positively when they perceived higher levels of organization-enhancement during the interview. Furthermore, applicants reported more positive affect and interview self-efficacy after the interview when they perceived higher levels of interviewer applicant-enhancement. We also found an indirect effect of interviewers' organization-enhancement on organizational prestige through applicants' perceptions of organization-enhancement as well as indirect effects of interviewers' applicant-enhancement on applicants' positive affect and interview self-efficacy through applicants' perceptions of applicant-enhancement. Our findings contribute to an integrated understanding of the effects of interviewer impression management and point out both risks and chances in selling and smooth-talking toward applicants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5447071/ /pubmed/28611696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740 Text en Copyright © 2017 Wilhelmy, Kleinmann, Melchers and Götz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wilhelmy, Annika Kleinmann, Martin Melchers, Klaus G. Götz, Martin Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title | Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title_full | Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title_fullStr | Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title_short | Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective |
title_sort | selling and smooth-talking: effects of interviewer impression management from a signaling perspective |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611696 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilhelmyannika sellingandsmoothtalkingeffectsofinterviewerimpressionmanagementfromasignalingperspective AT kleinmannmartin sellingandsmoothtalkingeffectsofinterviewerimpressionmanagementfromasignalingperspective AT melchersklausg sellingandsmoothtalkingeffectsofinterviewerimpressionmanagementfromasignalingperspective AT gotzmartin sellingandsmoothtalkingeffectsofinterviewerimpressionmanagementfromasignalingperspective |