Routine Angiographic Follow-Up versus Clinical Follow-Up after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction

PURPOSE: Differences in the utility of routine angiographic follow-up (RAF) and clinical follow-up (CF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not well understood. The present study aimed to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of RAF and CF in AMI pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yong Hoon, Her, Ae-Young, Rha, Seung-Woon, Choi, Byoung Geol, Shim, Minsuk, Choi, Se Yeon, Byun, Jae Kyeong, Li, Hu, Kim, Woohyeun, Kang, Jun Hyuk, Choi, Jah Yeon, Park, Eun Jin, Park, Sung Hun, Lee, Sunki, Na, Jin Oh, Choi, Cheol Ung, Lim, Hong Euy, Kim, Eung Ju, Park, Chang Gyu, Seo, Hong Seog, Oh, Dong Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28540983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.720

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28540983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.720

Ejemplares similares