Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Researchers should examine existing evidence to determine the need for a new study. It is unknown whether developers evaluate existing evidence to justify new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess whether authors of cardiovascular CPRs cited exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ban, Jong-Wook, Wallace, Emma, Stevens, Richard, Perera, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179102

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179102

Ejemplares similares