Cargando…
Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Researchers should examine existing evidence to determine the need for a new study. It is unknown whether developers evaluate existing evidence to justify new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess whether authors of cardiovascular CPRs cited exist...
Autores principales: | Ban, Jong-Wook, Wallace, Emma, Stevens, Richard, Perera, Rafael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179102 |
Ejemplares similares
-
GPs’ familiarity with and use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules: a UK survey study
por: Ban, Jong-Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Predictors for independent external validation of cardiovascular risk clinical prediction rules: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses
por: Ban, Jong-Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study
por: Ban, Jong- Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Staff Rules & Regulations Differences of the Existing Staff Rules and the Draft Regulations
Publicado: (1967) -
Rule-based generalization and peak shift in the presence of simple relational rules
por: Lee, Jessica C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)