Cargando…

A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC

Our previous work identified a 13-gene miRNA signature predictive of response to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, erlotinib, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer cell lines. Bioinformatic analysis of the signature showed a functional convergence on TGFβ canonical signalling. We hypoth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krentz Gober, Madeline, Collard, James P., Thompson, Katherine, Black, Esther P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04097-7
_version_ 1783245628548055040
author Krentz Gober, Madeline
Collard, James P.
Thompson, Katherine
Black, Esther P.
author_facet Krentz Gober, Madeline
Collard, James P.
Thompson, Katherine
Black, Esther P.
author_sort Krentz Gober, Madeline
collection PubMed
description Our previous work identified a 13-gene miRNA signature predictive of response to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, erlotinib, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer cell lines. Bioinformatic analysis of the signature showed a functional convergence on TGFβ canonical signalling. We hypothesized that TGFβ signalling controls expression of the miRNA genes comprising an erlotinib response signature in NSCLC. Western analysis revealed that TGFβ signalling via Smad2/3/4 occurred differently between erlotinib-resistant A549 and erlotinib- sensitive PC9 cells. We showed that TGFβ induced an interaction between Smad4 and putative Smad Binding Elements in PC9. However, qRT-PCR analysis showed that endogenous miR-140/141/200c expression changes resulted from time in treatments, not the treatments themselves. Moreover, flow cytometry indicated that cells exited the cell cycle in the same manner. Taken together these data indicated that the miRNA comprising the signature are likely regulated by the cell cycle rather than by TGFβ. Importantly, this work revealed that TGFβ did not induce EMT in PC9 cells, but rather TGFβ-inhibition induced an EMT-intermediate. These data also show that growth/proliferation signals by constitutively-activated EGFR may rely on TGFβ and a possible relationship between TGFβ and EGFR signalling may prevent EMT progression in this context rather than promote it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5482799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54827992017-06-26 A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC Krentz Gober, Madeline Collard, James P. Thompson, Katherine Black, Esther P. Sci Rep Article Our previous work identified a 13-gene miRNA signature predictive of response to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, erlotinib, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer cell lines. Bioinformatic analysis of the signature showed a functional convergence on TGFβ canonical signalling. We hypothesized that TGFβ signalling controls expression of the miRNA genes comprising an erlotinib response signature in NSCLC. Western analysis revealed that TGFβ signalling via Smad2/3/4 occurred differently between erlotinib-resistant A549 and erlotinib- sensitive PC9 cells. We showed that TGFβ induced an interaction between Smad4 and putative Smad Binding Elements in PC9. However, qRT-PCR analysis showed that endogenous miR-140/141/200c expression changes resulted from time in treatments, not the treatments themselves. Moreover, flow cytometry indicated that cells exited the cell cycle in the same manner. Taken together these data indicated that the miRNA comprising the signature are likely regulated by the cell cycle rather than by TGFβ. Importantly, this work revealed that TGFβ did not induce EMT in PC9 cells, but rather TGFβ-inhibition induced an EMT-intermediate. These data also show that growth/proliferation signals by constitutively-activated EGFR may rely on TGFβ and a possible relationship between TGFβ and EGFR signalling may prevent EMT progression in this context rather than promote it. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5482799/ /pubmed/28646226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04097-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Krentz Gober, Madeline
Collard, James P.
Thompson, Katherine
Black, Esther P.
A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title_full A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title_fullStr A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title_full_unstemmed A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title_short A microRNA signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of TGFβ behaviour in NSCLC
title_sort microrna signature of response to erlotinib is descriptive of tgfβ behaviour in nsclc
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04097-7
work_keys_str_mv AT krentzgobermadeline amicrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT collardjamesp amicrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT thompsonkatherine amicrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT blackestherp amicrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT krentzgobermadeline micrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT collardjamesp micrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT thompsonkatherine micrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc
AT blackestherp micrornasignatureofresponsetoerlotinibisdescriptiveoftgfbbehaviourinnsclc