Cargando…
Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells
The prokaryotic phage defense CRISPR/cas-system has developed into a versatile toolbox for genome engineering and genetic studies in many organisms. While many efforts were spent on analyzing the consequences of off-target effects, only few studies addressed side-effects that occur due to the target...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180135 |
_version_ | 1783246765370114048 |
---|---|
author | Kunzelmann, Stefan Förstemann, Klaus |
author_facet | Kunzelmann, Stefan Förstemann, Klaus |
author_sort | Kunzelmann, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prokaryotic phage defense CRISPR/cas-system has developed into a versatile toolbox for genome engineering and genetic studies in many organisms. While many efforts were spent on analyzing the consequences of off-target effects, only few studies addressed side-effects that occur due to the targeted manipulation of the genome. Here, we show that the CRISPR/cas9-mediated integration of an epitope tag in combination with a selection cassette can trigger an siRNA-mediated, epigenetic genome surveillance pathway in Drosophila melanogaster cells. After homology-directed insertion of the sequence coding for the epitope tag and the selection marker, a moderate level of siRNAs covering the inserted sequence and extending into the targeted locus was detected. This response affected protein levels less than two-fold and it persisted even after single cell cloning. However, removal of the selection cassette abolished the siRNA generation, demonstrating that this response is reversible. Consistently, marker-free genome engineering did not trigger the same surveillance mechanism. These two observations indicate that the selection cassette we employed induces an aberrant transcriptional arrangement and ultimately sets off the siRNA production. There have been prior concerns about undesirable effects induced by selection markers, but fortunately we were able to show that at least one of the epigenetic changes reverts as the marker gene is excised. Although the effects observed were rather weak (less than twofold de-repression upon ago2 or dcr-2 knock-down), we recommend that when selection markers are used during genome editing, a strategy for their subsequent removal should always be included. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5489201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54892012017-07-11 Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells Kunzelmann, Stefan Förstemann, Klaus PLoS One Research Article The prokaryotic phage defense CRISPR/cas-system has developed into a versatile toolbox for genome engineering and genetic studies in many organisms. While many efforts were spent on analyzing the consequences of off-target effects, only few studies addressed side-effects that occur due to the targeted manipulation of the genome. Here, we show that the CRISPR/cas9-mediated integration of an epitope tag in combination with a selection cassette can trigger an siRNA-mediated, epigenetic genome surveillance pathway in Drosophila melanogaster cells. After homology-directed insertion of the sequence coding for the epitope tag and the selection marker, a moderate level of siRNAs covering the inserted sequence and extending into the targeted locus was detected. This response affected protein levels less than two-fold and it persisted even after single cell cloning. However, removal of the selection cassette abolished the siRNA generation, demonstrating that this response is reversible. Consistently, marker-free genome engineering did not trigger the same surveillance mechanism. These two observations indicate that the selection cassette we employed induces an aberrant transcriptional arrangement and ultimately sets off the siRNA production. There have been prior concerns about undesirable effects induced by selection markers, but fortunately we were able to show that at least one of the epigenetic changes reverts as the marker gene is excised. Although the effects observed were rather weak (less than twofold de-repression upon ago2 or dcr-2 knock-down), we recommend that when selection markers are used during genome editing, a strategy for their subsequent removal should always be included. Public Library of Science 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5489201/ /pubmed/28658280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180135 Text en © 2017 Kunzelmann, Förstemann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kunzelmann, Stefan Förstemann, Klaus Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title | Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title_full | Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title_fullStr | Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title_short | Reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in Drosophila cells |
title_sort | reversible perturbations of gene regulation after genome editing in drosophila cells |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kunzelmannstefan reversibleperturbationsofgeneregulationaftergenomeeditingindrosophilacells AT forstemannklaus reversibleperturbationsofgeneregulationaftergenomeeditingindrosophilacells |