Cargando…

The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study

A strict gluten-free diet (GFD) can be diversified by non-contaminated oats, but there is a shortage of long-term studies concerning its safety. We compared long-term treatment outcomes and factors associated with the introduction of oats between celiac patients on a GFD with or without oats. Eight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aaltonen, Katri, Laurikka, Pilvi, Huhtala, Heini, Mäki, Markku, Kaukinen, Katri, Kurppa, Kalle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28617328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9060611
_version_ 1783247015281426432
author Aaltonen, Katri
Laurikka, Pilvi
Huhtala, Heini
Mäki, Markku
Kaukinen, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
author_facet Aaltonen, Katri
Laurikka, Pilvi
Huhtala, Heini
Mäki, Markku
Kaukinen, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
author_sort Aaltonen, Katri
collection PubMed
description A strict gluten-free diet (GFD) can be diversified by non-contaminated oats, but there is a shortage of long-term studies concerning its safety. We compared long-term treatment outcomes and factors associated with the introduction of oats between celiac patients on a GFD with or without oats. Eight hundred sixty-nine previously diagnosed celiac patients were interviewed. The validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB), and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess symptoms and quality of life, serological tests were performed, and results of histology were confirmed from patient records. We found the median duration of GFD to be 10 years and 82% using oats. Factors predicting the consumption of oats were diagnosis after the year 2000, advice from a dietitian, detection by screening, and mild clinical presentation. Oat consumers and non-consumers did not differ in dietary adherence (96.5% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.746), the prevalence of symptoms (22.9% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.931), positivity for endomysial antibodies (8.8% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.237), histological recovery after one year (63.1% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.773), malignancy (4.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.420), osteoporosis/osteopenia (9.2% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.489), or fractures (26.9% vs. 27.9%, p = 0.791). The oat consumers had better SF-36 physical role limitations and general health scores. Based on our results, the long-term consumption of oats in celiac disease patients is safe and may improve quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5490590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54905902017-07-03 The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study Aaltonen, Katri Laurikka, Pilvi Huhtala, Heini Mäki, Markku Kaukinen, Katri Kurppa, Kalle Nutrients Article A strict gluten-free diet (GFD) can be diversified by non-contaminated oats, but there is a shortage of long-term studies concerning its safety. We compared long-term treatment outcomes and factors associated with the introduction of oats between celiac patients on a GFD with or without oats. Eight hundred sixty-nine previously diagnosed celiac patients were interviewed. The validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB), and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess symptoms and quality of life, serological tests were performed, and results of histology were confirmed from patient records. We found the median duration of GFD to be 10 years and 82% using oats. Factors predicting the consumption of oats were diagnosis after the year 2000, advice from a dietitian, detection by screening, and mild clinical presentation. Oat consumers and non-consumers did not differ in dietary adherence (96.5% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.746), the prevalence of symptoms (22.9% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.931), positivity for endomysial antibodies (8.8% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.237), histological recovery after one year (63.1% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.773), malignancy (4.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.420), osteoporosis/osteopenia (9.2% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.489), or fractures (26.9% vs. 27.9%, p = 0.791). The oat consumers had better SF-36 physical role limitations and general health scores. Based on our results, the long-term consumption of oats in celiac disease patients is safe and may improve quality of life. MDPI 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5490590/ /pubmed/28617328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9060611 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aaltonen, Katri
Laurikka, Pilvi
Huhtala, Heini
Mäki, Markku
Kaukinen, Katri
Kurppa, Kalle
The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title_full The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title_short The Long-Term Consumption of Oats in Celiac Disease Patients Is Safe: A Large Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort long-term consumption of oats in celiac disease patients is safe: a large cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28617328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9060611
work_keys_str_mv AT aaltonenkatri thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT laurikkapilvi thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT huhtalaheini thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT makimarkku thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT kaukinenkatri thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT kurppakalle thelongtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT aaltonenkatri longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT laurikkapilvi longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT huhtalaheini longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT makimarkku longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT kaukinenkatri longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy
AT kurppakalle longtermconsumptionofoatsinceliacdiseasepatientsissafealargecrosssectionalstudy