Cargando…

The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season

The aims of the study were: (i) to compare leaf reflectance in visible (VIS) (400–700 nm), near-infrared (NIR) (740–1140 nm) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) (2000–2400 nm) spectral ranges measured monthly by a contact probe on a single leaf and a stack of five leaves (measurement setup (MS)) of two b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuwirthová, Eva, Lhotáková, Zuzana, Albrechtová, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28538685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061202
_version_ 1783247260979560448
author Neuwirthová, Eva
Lhotáková, Zuzana
Albrechtová, Jana
author_facet Neuwirthová, Eva
Lhotáková, Zuzana
Albrechtová, Jana
author_sort Neuwirthová, Eva
collection PubMed
description The aims of the study were: (i) to compare leaf reflectance in visible (VIS) (400–700 nm), near-infrared (NIR) (740–1140 nm) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) (2000–2400 nm) spectral ranges measured monthly by a contact probe on a single leaf and a stack of five leaves (measurement setup (MS)) of two broadleaved tree species during the vegetative season; and (ii) to test if and how selected vegetation indices differ under these two MS. In VIS, the pigment-related spectral region, the effect of MS on reflectance was negligible. The major influence of MS on reflectance was detected in NIR (up to 25%), the structure-related spectral range; and weaker effect in SWIR, the water-related spectral range. Vegetation indices involving VIS wavelengths were independent of MS while indices combining wavelengths from both VIS and NIR were MS-affected throughout the season. The effect of leaf stacking contributed to weakening the correlation between the leaf chlorophyll content and selected vegetation indices due to a higher leaf mass per area of the leaf sample. The majority of MS-affected indices were better correlated with chlorophyll content in both species in comparison with MS-unaffected indices. Therefore, in terms of monitoring leaf chlorophyll content using the contact probe reflectance measurement, these MS-affected indices should be used with caution, as discussed in the paper. If the vegetation indices are used for assessment of plant physiological status in various times of the vegetative season, then it is essential to take into consideration their possible changes induced by the particular contact probe measurement setup regarding the leaf stacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5492110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54921102017-07-03 The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season Neuwirthová, Eva Lhotáková, Zuzana Albrechtová, Jana Sensors (Basel) Article The aims of the study were: (i) to compare leaf reflectance in visible (VIS) (400–700 nm), near-infrared (NIR) (740–1140 nm) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) (2000–2400 nm) spectral ranges measured monthly by a contact probe on a single leaf and a stack of five leaves (measurement setup (MS)) of two broadleaved tree species during the vegetative season; and (ii) to test if and how selected vegetation indices differ under these two MS. In VIS, the pigment-related spectral region, the effect of MS on reflectance was negligible. The major influence of MS on reflectance was detected in NIR (up to 25%), the structure-related spectral range; and weaker effect in SWIR, the water-related spectral range. Vegetation indices involving VIS wavelengths were independent of MS while indices combining wavelengths from both VIS and NIR were MS-affected throughout the season. The effect of leaf stacking contributed to weakening the correlation between the leaf chlorophyll content and selected vegetation indices due to a higher leaf mass per area of the leaf sample. The majority of MS-affected indices were better correlated with chlorophyll content in both species in comparison with MS-unaffected indices. Therefore, in terms of monitoring leaf chlorophyll content using the contact probe reflectance measurement, these MS-affected indices should be used with caution, as discussed in the paper. If the vegetation indices are used for assessment of plant physiological status in various times of the vegetative season, then it is essential to take into consideration their possible changes induced by the particular contact probe measurement setup regarding the leaf stacking. MDPI 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5492110/ /pubmed/28538685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061202 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Neuwirthová, Eva
Lhotáková, Zuzana
Albrechtová, Jana
The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title_full The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title_fullStr The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title_short The Effect of Leaf Stacking on Leaf Reflectance and Vegetation Indices Measured by Contact Probe during the Season
title_sort effect of leaf stacking on leaf reflectance and vegetation indices measured by contact probe during the season
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28538685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061202
work_keys_str_mv AT neuwirthovaeva theeffectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason
AT lhotakovazuzana theeffectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason
AT albrechtovajana theeffectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason
AT neuwirthovaeva effectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason
AT lhotakovazuzana effectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason
AT albrechtovajana effectofleafstackingonleafreflectanceandvegetationindicesmeasuredbycontactprobeduringtheseason