Cargando…
The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
Introduction Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811 |
_version_ | 1783247830163390464 |
---|---|
author | Kasemsiri, Pornthep Mahawerawat, Kanokkan Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn Puttarak, Warinthorn Munkong, Waranon |
author_facet | Kasemsiri, Pornthep Mahawerawat, Kanokkan Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn Puttarak, Warinthorn Munkong, Waranon |
author_sort | Kasemsiri, Pornthep |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign body in the throat Methods This descriptive experimental study design has three phases. In the first phase, we assessed subject contrast and visibility of fishbone on a homogeneous background; as for the second phase, we evaluated the embedded fishbone in the fresh cadaver's throat. In the last phase, we studied the accuracy of radiography in diagnosing the fishbone foreign body at any site of the cadaver's throat. Results The subject contrast of 15 fishbones ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. All types of fishbone were obvious in the first phase, whereas, in the second phase, visibility of fishbone was varied. The subject contrast and diameter of fishbone did not show statistically significant correlation with visibility ( p = 0.09 and p = 0.24, respectively). In the third phase, embedded fishbone in the base of tongue was detected with the highest accuracy (sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.44–1.00) and specificity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.65–0.99)); whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation with poorest diagnostic value (sensitivity of 0.00 (95%CI: 0.00–0.56) and specificity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.76–1.00)). Conclusion The digital radiography provides the highest accuracy and benefit to the diagnosis of a fishbone foreign body at the base of the tongue; whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5495598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54955982017-07-05 The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat Kasemsiri, Pornthep Mahawerawat, Kanokkan Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn Puttarak, Warinthorn Munkong, Waranon Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign body in the throat Methods This descriptive experimental study design has three phases. In the first phase, we assessed subject contrast and visibility of fishbone on a homogeneous background; as for the second phase, we evaluated the embedded fishbone in the fresh cadaver's throat. In the last phase, we studied the accuracy of radiography in diagnosing the fishbone foreign body at any site of the cadaver's throat. Results The subject contrast of 15 fishbones ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. All types of fishbone were obvious in the first phase, whereas, in the second phase, visibility of fishbone was varied. The subject contrast and diameter of fishbone did not show statistically significant correlation with visibility ( p = 0.09 and p = 0.24, respectively). In the third phase, embedded fishbone in the base of tongue was detected with the highest accuracy (sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.44–1.00) and specificity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.65–0.99)); whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation with poorest diagnostic value (sensitivity of 0.00 (95%CI: 0.00–0.56) and specificity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.76–1.00)). Conclusion The digital radiography provides the highest accuracy and benefit to the diagnosis of a fishbone foreign body at the base of the tongue; whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017-07 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5495598/ /pubmed/28680494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Kasemsiri, Pornthep Mahawerawat, Kanokkan Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn Puttarak, Warinthorn Munkong, Waranon The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title | The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title_full | The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title_fullStr | The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title_full_unstemmed | The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title_short | The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat |
title_sort | accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign bodies in the throat |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasemsiripornthep theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT mahawerawatkanokkan theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT ratanaanekchaiteeraporn theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT puttarakwarinthorn theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT munkongwaranon theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT kasemsiripornthep accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT mahawerawatkanokkan accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT ratanaanekchaiteeraporn accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT puttarakwarinthorn accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat AT munkongwaranon accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat |