Cargando…

The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat

Introduction  Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective  The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasemsiri, Pornthep, Mahawerawat, Kanokkan, Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn, Puttarak, Warinthorn, Munkong, Waranon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811
_version_ 1783247830163390464
author Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Mahawerawat, Kanokkan
Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn
Puttarak, Warinthorn
Munkong, Waranon
author_facet Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Mahawerawat, Kanokkan
Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn
Puttarak, Warinthorn
Munkong, Waranon
author_sort Kasemsiri, Pornthep
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective  The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign body in the throat Methods  This descriptive experimental study design has three phases. In the first phase, we assessed subject contrast and visibility of fishbone on a homogeneous background; as for the second phase, we evaluated the embedded fishbone in the fresh cadaver's throat. In the last phase, we studied the accuracy of radiography in diagnosing the fishbone foreign body at any site of the cadaver's throat. Results  The subject contrast of 15 fishbones ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. All types of fishbone were obvious in the first phase, whereas, in the second phase, visibility of fishbone was varied. The subject contrast and diameter of fishbone did not show statistically significant correlation with visibility ( p  = 0.09 and p  = 0.24, respectively). In the third phase, embedded fishbone in the base of tongue was detected with the highest accuracy (sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.44–1.00) and specificity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.65–0.99)); whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation with poorest diagnostic value (sensitivity of 0.00 (95%CI: 0.00–0.56) and specificity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.76–1.00)). Conclusion  The digital radiography provides the highest accuracy and benefit to the diagnosis of a fishbone foreign body at the base of the tongue; whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5495598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54955982017-07-05 The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat Kasemsiri, Pornthep Mahawerawat, Kanokkan Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn Puttarak, Warinthorn Munkong, Waranon Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  Some patients with a fishbone as a foreign body of difficult diagnosis may require further investigations. Generally, radiography is used as the first choice for finding the fishbone. Objective  The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign body in the throat Methods  This descriptive experimental study design has three phases. In the first phase, we assessed subject contrast and visibility of fishbone on a homogeneous background; as for the second phase, we evaluated the embedded fishbone in the fresh cadaver's throat. In the last phase, we studied the accuracy of radiography in diagnosing the fishbone foreign body at any site of the cadaver's throat. Results  The subject contrast of 15 fishbones ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. All types of fishbone were obvious in the first phase, whereas, in the second phase, visibility of fishbone was varied. The subject contrast and diameter of fishbone did not show statistically significant correlation with visibility ( p  = 0.09 and p  = 0.24, respectively). In the third phase, embedded fishbone in the base of tongue was detected with the highest accuracy (sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.44–1.00) and specificity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.65–0.99)); whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation with poorest diagnostic value (sensitivity of 0.00 (95%CI: 0.00–0.56) and specificity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.76–1.00)). Conclusion  The digital radiography provides the highest accuracy and benefit to the diagnosis of a fishbone foreign body at the base of the tongue; whereas, the tonsil was of difficult interpretation. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017-07 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5495598/ /pubmed/28680494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Mahawerawat, Kanokkan
Ratanaanekchai, Teeraporn
Puttarak, Warinthorn
Munkong, Waranon
The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title_full The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title_fullStr The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title_short The Accuracy of Digital Radiography for Diagnosis of Fishbone Foreign Bodies in the Throat
title_sort accuracy of digital radiography for diagnosis of fishbone foreign bodies in the throat
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597811
work_keys_str_mv AT kasemsiripornthep theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT mahawerawatkanokkan theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT ratanaanekchaiteeraporn theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT puttarakwarinthorn theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT munkongwaranon theaccuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT kasemsiripornthep accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT mahawerawatkanokkan accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT ratanaanekchaiteeraporn accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT puttarakwarinthorn accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat
AT munkongwaranon accuracyofdigitalradiographyfordiagnosisoffishboneforeignbodiesinthethroat