Cargando…

Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling

BACKGROUND: Phred quality scores are essential for downstream DNA analysis such as SNP detection and DNA assembly. Thus a valid model to define them is indispensable for any base-calling software. Recently, we developed the base-caller 3Dec for Illumina sequencing platforms, which reduces base-calli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Sheng, Wang, Bo, Wan, Lin, Li, Lei M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1743-4
_version_ 1783249348900945920
author Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Bo
Wan, Lin
Li, Lei M.
author_facet Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Bo
Wan, Lin
Li, Lei M.
author_sort Zhang, Sheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phred quality scores are essential for downstream DNA analysis such as SNP detection and DNA assembly. Thus a valid model to define them is indispensable for any base-calling software. Recently, we developed the base-caller 3Dec for Illumina sequencing platforms, which reduces base-calling errors by 44-69% compared to the existing ones. However, the model to predict its quality scores has not been fully investigated yet. RESULTS: In this study, we used logistic regression models to evaluate quality scores from predictive features, which include different aspects of the sequencing signals as well as local DNA contents. Sparse models were further obtained by three methods: the backward deletion with either AIC or BIC and the L (1) regularization learning method. The L (1)-regularized one was then compared with the Illumina scoring method. CONCLUSIONS: The L (1)-regularized logistic regression improves the empirical discrimination power by as large as 14 and 25% respectively for two kinds of preprocessed sequencing signals, compared to the Illumina scoring method. Namely, the L (1) method identifies more base calls of high fidelity. Computationally, the L (1) method can handle large dataset and is efficient enough for daily sequencing. Meanwhile, the logistic model resulted from BIC is more interpretable. The modeling suggested that the most prominent quenching pattern in the current chemistry of Illumina occurred at the dinucleotide “GT”. Besides, nucleotides were more likely to be miscalled as the previous bases if the preceding ones were not “G”. It suggested that the phasing effect of bases after “G” was somewhat different from those after other nucleotide types. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1743-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55047922017-07-12 Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling Zhang, Sheng Wang, Bo Wan, Lin Li, Lei M. BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Phred quality scores are essential for downstream DNA analysis such as SNP detection and DNA assembly. Thus a valid model to define them is indispensable for any base-calling software. Recently, we developed the base-caller 3Dec for Illumina sequencing platforms, which reduces base-calling errors by 44-69% compared to the existing ones. However, the model to predict its quality scores has not been fully investigated yet. RESULTS: In this study, we used logistic regression models to evaluate quality scores from predictive features, which include different aspects of the sequencing signals as well as local DNA contents. Sparse models were further obtained by three methods: the backward deletion with either AIC or BIC and the L (1) regularization learning method. The L (1)-regularized one was then compared with the Illumina scoring method. CONCLUSIONS: The L (1)-regularized logistic regression improves the empirical discrimination power by as large as 14 and 25% respectively for two kinds of preprocessed sequencing signals, compared to the Illumina scoring method. Namely, the L (1) method identifies more base calls of high fidelity. Computationally, the L (1) method can handle large dataset and is efficient enough for daily sequencing. Meanwhile, the logistic model resulted from BIC is more interpretable. The modeling suggested that the most prominent quenching pattern in the current chemistry of Illumina occurred at the dinucleotide “GT”. Besides, nucleotides were more likely to be miscalled as the previous bases if the preceding ones were not “G”. It suggested that the phasing effect of bases after “G” was somewhat different from those after other nucleotide types. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1743-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504792/ /pubmed/28697757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1743-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Sheng
Wang, Bo
Wan, Lin
Li, Lei M.
Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title_full Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title_fullStr Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title_short Estimating Phred scores of Illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
title_sort estimating phred scores of illumina base calls by logistic regression and sparse modeling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1743-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangsheng estimatingphredscoresofilluminabasecallsbylogisticregressionandsparsemodeling
AT wangbo estimatingphredscoresofilluminabasecallsbylogisticregressionandsparsemodeling
AT wanlin estimatingphredscoresofilluminabasecallsbylogisticregressionandsparsemodeling
AT lileim estimatingphredscoresofilluminabasecallsbylogisticregressionandsparsemodeling