Cargando…

Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users

Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vezich, I. Stephanie, Katzman, Perri L., Ames, Daniel L., Falk, Emily B., Lieberman, Matthew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113
_version_ 1783251205932187648
author Vezich, I. Stephanie
Katzman, Perri L.
Ames, Daniel L.
Falk, Emily B.
Lieberman, Matthew D.
author_facet Vezich, I. Stephanie
Katzman, Perri L.
Ames, Daniel L.
Falk, Emily B.
Lieberman, Matthew D.
author_sort Vezich, I. Stephanie
collection PubMed
description Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relationship and tested two additional framing effects known to alter message receptivity. First, we examined gain- vs. loss-framed reasons for a health behavior (sunscreen use). Consistent with predictions from prospect theory, we observed greater MPFC activity to gain- vs. loss-framed messages, and this activity was associated with behavior. This relationship was stronger for those who were not previously sunscreen users. Second, building on theories of action planning, we compared neural activity during messages regarding how vs. why to enact the behavior. We observed rostral inferior parietal lobule and posterior inferior frontal gyrus activity during action planning (“how” messages), and this activity was associated with behavior; this is in contrast to the relationship between MPFC activity during the “why” (i.e., gain and loss) messages and behavior. These results reinforce that persuasion occurs in part via self-value integration—seeing value and incorporating persuasive messages into one's self-concept—and extend this work to demonstrate how message framing and action planning may influence this process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5516692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55166922017-07-24 Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users Vezich, I. Stephanie Katzman, Perri L. Ames, Daniel L. Falk, Emily B. Lieberman, Matthew D. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relationship and tested two additional framing effects known to alter message receptivity. First, we examined gain- vs. loss-framed reasons for a health behavior (sunscreen use). Consistent with predictions from prospect theory, we observed greater MPFC activity to gain- vs. loss-framed messages, and this activity was associated with behavior. This relationship was stronger for those who were not previously sunscreen users. Second, building on theories of action planning, we compared neural activity during messages regarding how vs. why to enact the behavior. We observed rostral inferior parietal lobule and posterior inferior frontal gyrus activity during action planning (“how” messages), and this activity was associated with behavior; this is in contrast to the relationship between MPFC activity during the “why” (i.e., gain and loss) messages and behavior. These results reinforce that persuasion occurs in part via self-value integration—seeing value and incorporating persuasive messages into one's self-concept—and extend this work to demonstrate how message framing and action planning may influence this process. Oxford University Press 2016-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5516692/ /pubmed/27521303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113 Text en © The Author(s) (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vezich, I. Stephanie
Katzman, Perri L.
Ames, Daniel L.
Falk, Emily B.
Lieberman, Matthew D.
Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title_full Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title_fullStr Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title_full_unstemmed Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title_short Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
title_sort modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113
work_keys_str_mv AT vezichistephanie modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers
AT katzmanperril modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers
AT amesdaniell modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers
AT falkemilyb modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers
AT liebermanmatthewd modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers