Cargando…
Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users
Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113 |
_version_ | 1783251205932187648 |
---|---|
author | Vezich, I. Stephanie Katzman, Perri L. Ames, Daniel L. Falk, Emily B. Lieberman, Matthew D. |
author_facet | Vezich, I. Stephanie Katzman, Perri L. Ames, Daniel L. Falk, Emily B. Lieberman, Matthew D. |
author_sort | Vezich, I. Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relationship and tested two additional framing effects known to alter message receptivity. First, we examined gain- vs. loss-framed reasons for a health behavior (sunscreen use). Consistent with predictions from prospect theory, we observed greater MPFC activity to gain- vs. loss-framed messages, and this activity was associated with behavior. This relationship was stronger for those who were not previously sunscreen users. Second, building on theories of action planning, we compared neural activity during messages regarding how vs. why to enact the behavior. We observed rostral inferior parietal lobule and posterior inferior frontal gyrus activity during action planning (“how” messages), and this activity was associated with behavior; this is in contrast to the relationship between MPFC activity during the “why” (i.e., gain and loss) messages and behavior. These results reinforce that persuasion occurs in part via self-value integration—seeing value and incorporating persuasive messages into one's self-concept—and extend this work to demonstrate how message framing and action planning may influence this process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5516692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55166922017-07-24 Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users Vezich, I. Stephanie Katzman, Perri L. Ames, Daniel L. Falk, Emily B. Lieberman, Matthew D. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Designing persuasive content is challenging, in part because people can be poor predictors of their actions. Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during message exposure reliably predicts downstream behavior, but past work has been largely atheoretical. We replicated past results on this relationship and tested two additional framing effects known to alter message receptivity. First, we examined gain- vs. loss-framed reasons for a health behavior (sunscreen use). Consistent with predictions from prospect theory, we observed greater MPFC activity to gain- vs. loss-framed messages, and this activity was associated with behavior. This relationship was stronger for those who were not previously sunscreen users. Second, building on theories of action planning, we compared neural activity during messages regarding how vs. why to enact the behavior. We observed rostral inferior parietal lobule and posterior inferior frontal gyrus activity during action planning (“how” messages), and this activity was associated with behavior; this is in contrast to the relationship between MPFC activity during the “why” (i.e., gain and loss) messages and behavior. These results reinforce that persuasion occurs in part via self-value integration—seeing value and incorporating persuasive messages into one's self-concept—and extend this work to demonstrate how message framing and action planning may influence this process. Oxford University Press 2016-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5516692/ /pubmed/27521303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113 Text en © The Author(s) (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vezich, I. Stephanie Katzman, Perri L. Ames, Daniel L. Falk, Emily B. Lieberman, Matthew D. Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title | Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title_full | Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title_fullStr | Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title_short | Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
title_sort | modulating the neural bases of persuasion: why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vezichistephanie modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers AT katzmanperril modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers AT amesdaniell modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers AT falkemilyb modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers AT liebermanmatthewd modulatingtheneuralbasesofpersuasionwhyhowgainlossandusersnonusers |