Cargando…
A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775 |
_version_ | 1783252045668548608 |
---|---|
author | Motz, Benjamin A. de Leeuw, Joshua R. Carvalho, Paulo F. Liang, Kaley L. Goldstone, Robert L. |
author_facet | Motz, Benjamin A. de Leeuw, Joshua R. Carvalho, Paulo F. Liang, Kaley L. Goldstone, Robert L. |
author_sort | Motz, Benjamin A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, investigating whether enthusiastic instructions for a memory task would improve recall accuracy. Scripted videos, either enthusiastic or neutral, were used to manipulate the delivery of task instructions. We also manipulated the sequence of learning items, replicating the spacing effect, a known cognitive technique for memory improvement. Although spaced study reliably improved test performance, we found no reliable effect of enthusiasm on memory performance across two experiments. We did, however, find that enthusiastic instructions caused participants to respond to more item prompts, leaving fewer test questions blank, an outcome typically associated with increased task motivation. We find no support for the popular claim that enthusiastic instruction will improve learning, although it may still improve engagement. This dissociation between motivation and learning is discussed, as well as its implications for education and future research on student learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5521834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55218342017-08-07 A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task Motz, Benjamin A. de Leeuw, Joshua R. Carvalho, Paulo F. Liang, Kaley L. Goldstone, Robert L. PLoS One Research Article Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, investigating whether enthusiastic instructions for a memory task would improve recall accuracy. Scripted videos, either enthusiastic or neutral, were used to manipulate the delivery of task instructions. We also manipulated the sequence of learning items, replicating the spacing effect, a known cognitive technique for memory improvement. Although spaced study reliably improved test performance, we found no reliable effect of enthusiasm on memory performance across two experiments. We did, however, find that enthusiastic instructions caused participants to respond to more item prompts, leaving fewer test questions blank, an outcome typically associated with increased task motivation. We find no support for the popular claim that enthusiastic instruction will improve learning, although it may still improve engagement. This dissociation between motivation and learning is discussed, as well as its implications for education and future research on student learning. Public Library of Science 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521834/ /pubmed/28732087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775 Text en © 2017 Motz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Motz, Benjamin A. de Leeuw, Joshua R. Carvalho, Paulo F. Liang, Kaley L. Goldstone, Robert L. A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title | A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title_full | A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title_fullStr | A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title_full_unstemmed | A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title_short | A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
title_sort | dissociation between engagement and learning: enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT motzbenjamina adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT deleeuwjoshuar adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT carvalhopaulof adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT liangkaleyl adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT goldstonerobertl adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT motzbenjamina dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT deleeuwjoshuar dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT carvalhopaulof dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT liangkaleyl dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask AT goldstonerobertl dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask |