Cargando…

A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task

Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motz, Benjamin A., de Leeuw, Joshua R., Carvalho, Paulo F., Liang, Kaley L., Goldstone, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775
_version_ 1783252045668548608
author Motz, Benjamin A.
de Leeuw, Joshua R.
Carvalho, Paulo F.
Liang, Kaley L.
Goldstone, Robert L.
author_facet Motz, Benjamin A.
de Leeuw, Joshua R.
Carvalho, Paulo F.
Liang, Kaley L.
Goldstone, Robert L.
author_sort Motz, Benjamin A.
collection PubMed
description Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, investigating whether enthusiastic instructions for a memory task would improve recall accuracy. Scripted videos, either enthusiastic or neutral, were used to manipulate the delivery of task instructions. We also manipulated the sequence of learning items, replicating the spacing effect, a known cognitive technique for memory improvement. Although spaced study reliably improved test performance, we found no reliable effect of enthusiasm on memory performance across two experiments. We did, however, find that enthusiastic instructions caused participants to respond to more item prompts, leaving fewer test questions blank, an outcome typically associated with increased task motivation. We find no support for the popular claim that enthusiastic instruction will improve learning, although it may still improve engagement. This dissociation between motivation and learning is discussed, as well as its implications for education and future research on student learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5521834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55218342017-08-07 A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task Motz, Benjamin A. de Leeuw, Joshua R. Carvalho, Paulo F. Liang, Kaley L. Goldstone, Robert L. PLoS One Research Article Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, investigating whether enthusiastic instructions for a memory task would improve recall accuracy. Scripted videos, either enthusiastic or neutral, were used to manipulate the delivery of task instructions. We also manipulated the sequence of learning items, replicating the spacing effect, a known cognitive technique for memory improvement. Although spaced study reliably improved test performance, we found no reliable effect of enthusiasm on memory performance across two experiments. We did, however, find that enthusiastic instructions caused participants to respond to more item prompts, leaving fewer test questions blank, an outcome typically associated with increased task motivation. We find no support for the popular claim that enthusiastic instruction will improve learning, although it may still improve engagement. This dissociation between motivation and learning is discussed, as well as its implications for education and future research on student learning. Public Library of Science 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5521834/ /pubmed/28732087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775 Text en © 2017 Motz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Motz, Benjamin A.
de Leeuw, Joshua R.
Carvalho, Paulo F.
Liang, Kaley L.
Goldstone, Robert L.
A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title_full A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title_fullStr A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title_full_unstemmed A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title_short A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
title_sort dissociation between engagement and learning: enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5521834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181775
work_keys_str_mv AT motzbenjamina adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT deleeuwjoshuar adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT carvalhopaulof adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT liangkaleyl adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT goldstonerobertl adissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT motzbenjamina dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT deleeuwjoshuar dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT carvalhopaulof dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT liangkaleyl dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask
AT goldstonerobertl dissociationbetweenengagementandlearningenthusiasticinstructionsfailtoreliablyimproveperformanceonamemorytask