Cargando…

Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”

BACKGROUND: Transmembrane helices (TMHs) frequently occur amongst protein architectures as means for proteins to attach to or embed into biological membranes. Physical constraints such as the membrane’s hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential apply uniform requirements to TMHs and their flanking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, James Alexander, Wong, Wing-Cheong, Eisenhaber, Birgit, Warwicker, Jim, Eisenhaber, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0404-4
_version_ 1783252598946529280
author Baker, James Alexander
Wong, Wing-Cheong
Eisenhaber, Birgit
Warwicker, Jim
Eisenhaber, Frank
author_facet Baker, James Alexander
Wong, Wing-Cheong
Eisenhaber, Birgit
Warwicker, Jim
Eisenhaber, Frank
author_sort Baker, James Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transmembrane helices (TMHs) frequently occur amongst protein architectures as means for proteins to attach to or embed into biological membranes. Physical constraints such as the membrane’s hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential apply uniform requirements to TMHs and their flanking regions; consequently, they are mirrored in their sequence patterns (in addition to TMHs being a span of generally hydrophobic residues) on top of variations enforced by the specific protein’s biological functions. RESULTS: With statistics derived from a large body of protein sequences, we demonstrate that, in addition to the positive charge preference at the cytoplasmic inside (positive-inside rule), negatively charged residues preferentially occur or are even enriched at the non-cytoplasmic flank or, at least, they are suppressed at the cytoplasmic flank (negative-not-inside/negative-outside (NNI/NO) rule). As negative residues are generally rare within or near TMHs, the statistical significance is sensitive with regard to details of TMH alignment and residue frequency normalisation and also to dataset size; therefore, this trend was obscured in previous work. We observe variations amongst taxa as well as for organelles along the secretory pathway. The effect is most pronounced for TMHs from single-pass transmembrane (bitopic) proteins compared to those with multiple TMHs (polytopic proteins) and especially for the class of simple TMHs that evolved for the sole role as membrane anchors. CONCLUSIONS: The charged-residue flank bias is only one of the TMH sequence features with a role in the anchorage mechanisms, others apparently being the leucine intra-helix propensity skew towards the cytoplasmic side, tryptophan flanking as well as the cysteine and tyrosine inside preference. These observations will stimulate new prediction methods for TMHs and protein topology from a sequence as well as new engineering designs for artificial membrane proteins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0404-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5525207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55252072017-07-26 Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule” Baker, James Alexander Wong, Wing-Cheong Eisenhaber, Birgit Warwicker, Jim Eisenhaber, Frank BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Transmembrane helices (TMHs) frequently occur amongst protein architectures as means for proteins to attach to or embed into biological membranes. Physical constraints such as the membrane’s hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential apply uniform requirements to TMHs and their flanking regions; consequently, they are mirrored in their sequence patterns (in addition to TMHs being a span of generally hydrophobic residues) on top of variations enforced by the specific protein’s biological functions. RESULTS: With statistics derived from a large body of protein sequences, we demonstrate that, in addition to the positive charge preference at the cytoplasmic inside (positive-inside rule), negatively charged residues preferentially occur or are even enriched at the non-cytoplasmic flank or, at least, they are suppressed at the cytoplasmic flank (negative-not-inside/negative-outside (NNI/NO) rule). As negative residues are generally rare within or near TMHs, the statistical significance is sensitive with regard to details of TMH alignment and residue frequency normalisation and also to dataset size; therefore, this trend was obscured in previous work. We observe variations amongst taxa as well as for organelles along the secretory pathway. The effect is most pronounced for TMHs from single-pass transmembrane (bitopic) proteins compared to those with multiple TMHs (polytopic proteins) and especially for the class of simple TMHs that evolved for the sole role as membrane anchors. CONCLUSIONS: The charged-residue flank bias is only one of the TMH sequence features with a role in the anchorage mechanisms, others apparently being the leucine intra-helix propensity skew towards the cytoplasmic side, tryptophan flanking as well as the cysteine and tyrosine inside preference. These observations will stimulate new prediction methods for TMHs and protein topology from a sequence as well as new engineering designs for artificial membrane proteins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0404-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5525207/ /pubmed/28738801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0404-4 Text en © Eisenhaber et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baker, James Alexander
Wong, Wing-Cheong
Eisenhaber, Birgit
Warwicker, Jim
Eisenhaber, Frank
Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title_full Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title_fullStr Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title_full_unstemmed Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title_short Charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “Positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
title_sort charged residues next to transmembrane regions revisited: “positive-inside rule” is complemented by the “negative inside depletion/outside enrichment rule”
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5525207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0404-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerjamesalexander chargedresiduesnexttotransmembraneregionsrevisitedpositiveinsideruleiscomplementedbythenegativeinsidedepletionoutsideenrichmentrule
AT wongwingcheong chargedresiduesnexttotransmembraneregionsrevisitedpositiveinsideruleiscomplementedbythenegativeinsidedepletionoutsideenrichmentrule
AT eisenhaberbirgit chargedresiduesnexttotransmembraneregionsrevisitedpositiveinsideruleiscomplementedbythenegativeinsidedepletionoutsideenrichmentrule
AT warwickerjim chargedresiduesnexttotransmembraneregionsrevisitedpositiveinsideruleiscomplementedbythenegativeinsidedepletionoutsideenrichmentrule
AT eisenhaberfrank chargedresiduesnexttotransmembraneregionsrevisitedpositiveinsideruleiscomplementedbythenegativeinsidedepletionoutsideenrichmentrule