Cargando…

Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense

Successful host defense against pathogens requires innate immune recognition of the correct pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) to trigger the appropriate gene program tailored to the pathogen. While many PRR pathways contribute to the innate immun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scumpia, Philip O., Botten, Giovanni A., Norman, Joshua S., Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M., Spreafico, Roberto, Ruccia, Amber R., Purbey, Prabhat K., Thomas, Brandon J., Modlin, Robert L., Smale, Stephen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28704551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006496
_version_ 1783252832907952128
author Scumpia, Philip O.
Botten, Giovanni A.
Norman, Joshua S.
Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M.
Spreafico, Roberto
Ruccia, Amber R.
Purbey, Prabhat K.
Thomas, Brandon J.
Modlin, Robert L.
Smale, Stephen T.
author_facet Scumpia, Philip O.
Botten, Giovanni A.
Norman, Joshua S.
Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M.
Spreafico, Roberto
Ruccia, Amber R.
Purbey, Prabhat K.
Thomas, Brandon J.
Modlin, Robert L.
Smale, Stephen T.
author_sort Scumpia, Philip O.
collection PubMed
description Successful host defense against pathogens requires innate immune recognition of the correct pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) to trigger the appropriate gene program tailored to the pathogen. While many PRR pathways contribute to the innate immune response to specific pathogens, the relative importance of each pathway for the complete transcriptional program elicited has not been examined in detail. Herein, we used RNA-sequencing with wildtype and mutant macrophages to delineate the innate immune pathways contributing to the early transcriptional response to Staphylococcus aureus, a ubiquitous microorganism that can activate a wide variety of PRRs. Unexpectedly, two PRR pathways—the Toll-like receptor (TLR) and Stimulator of Interferon Gene (STING) pathways—were identified as dominant regulators of approximately 95% of the genes that were potently induced within the first four hours of macrophage infection with live S. aureus. TLR signaling predominantly activated a pro-inflammatory program while STING signaling activated an antiviral/type I interferon response with live but not killed S. aureus. This STING response was largely dependent on the cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic guanosine-adenosine synthase (cGAS). Using a cutaneous infection model, we found that the TLR and STING pathways played opposite roles in host defense to S. aureus. TLR signaling was required for host defense, with its absence reducing interleukin (IL)-1β production and neutrophil recruitment, resulting in increased bacterial growth. In contrast, absence of STING signaling had the opposite effect, enhancing the ability to restrict the infection. These results provide novel insights into the complex interplay of innate immune signaling pathways triggered by S. aureus and uncover opposing roles of TLR and STING in cutaneous host defense to S. aureus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5526579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55265792017-08-07 Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense Scumpia, Philip O. Botten, Giovanni A. Norman, Joshua S. Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M. Spreafico, Roberto Ruccia, Amber R. Purbey, Prabhat K. Thomas, Brandon J. Modlin, Robert L. Smale, Stephen T. PLoS Pathog Research Article Successful host defense against pathogens requires innate immune recognition of the correct pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) to trigger the appropriate gene program tailored to the pathogen. While many PRR pathways contribute to the innate immune response to specific pathogens, the relative importance of each pathway for the complete transcriptional program elicited has not been examined in detail. Herein, we used RNA-sequencing with wildtype and mutant macrophages to delineate the innate immune pathways contributing to the early transcriptional response to Staphylococcus aureus, a ubiquitous microorganism that can activate a wide variety of PRRs. Unexpectedly, two PRR pathways—the Toll-like receptor (TLR) and Stimulator of Interferon Gene (STING) pathways—were identified as dominant regulators of approximately 95% of the genes that were potently induced within the first four hours of macrophage infection with live S. aureus. TLR signaling predominantly activated a pro-inflammatory program while STING signaling activated an antiviral/type I interferon response with live but not killed S. aureus. This STING response was largely dependent on the cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic guanosine-adenosine synthase (cGAS). Using a cutaneous infection model, we found that the TLR and STING pathways played opposite roles in host defense to S. aureus. TLR signaling was required for host defense, with its absence reducing interleukin (IL)-1β production and neutrophil recruitment, resulting in increased bacterial growth. In contrast, absence of STING signaling had the opposite effect, enhancing the ability to restrict the infection. These results provide novel insights into the complex interplay of innate immune signaling pathways triggered by S. aureus and uncover opposing roles of TLR and STING in cutaneous host defense to S. aureus. Public Library of Science 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5526579/ /pubmed/28704551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006496 Text en © 2017 Scumpia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scumpia, Philip O.
Botten, Giovanni A.
Norman, Joshua S.
Kelly-Scumpia, Kindra M.
Spreafico, Roberto
Ruccia, Amber R.
Purbey, Prabhat K.
Thomas, Brandon J.
Modlin, Robert L.
Smale, Stephen T.
Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title_full Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title_fullStr Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title_full_unstemmed Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title_short Opposing roles of Toll-like receptor and cytosolic DNA-STING signaling pathways for Staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
title_sort opposing roles of toll-like receptor and cytosolic dna-sting signaling pathways for staphylococcus aureus cutaneous host defense
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5526579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28704551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006496
work_keys_str_mv AT scumpiaphilipo opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT bottengiovannia opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT normanjoshuas opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT kellyscumpiakindram opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT spreaficoroberto opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT rucciaamberr opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT purbeyprabhatk opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT thomasbrandonj opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT modlinrobertl opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense
AT smalestephent opposingrolesoftolllikereceptorandcytosolicdnastingsignalingpathwaysforstaphylococcusaureuscutaneoushostdefense