Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burmester, Gerd R, Lin, Yong, Patel, Rahul, van Adelsberg, Janet, Mangan, Erin K, Graham, Neil M H, van Hoogstraten, Hubert, Bauer, Deborah, Ignacio Vargas, Juan, Lee, Eun Bong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310
_version_ 1783253248328597504
author Burmester, Gerd R
Lin, Yong
Patel, Rahul
van Adelsberg, Janet
Mangan, Erin K
Graham, Neil M H
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Bauer, Deborah
Ignacio Vargas, Juan
Lee, Eun Bong
author_facet Burmester, Gerd R
Lin, Yong
Patel, Rahul
van Adelsberg, Janet
Mangan, Erin K
Graham, Neil M H
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Bauer, Deborah
Ignacio Vargas, Juan
Lee, Eun Bong
author_sort Burmester, Gerd R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. RESULTS: Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (−3.28 vs −2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02332590.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5530335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55303352017-07-31 Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial Burmester, Gerd R Lin, Yong Patel, Rahul van Adelsberg, Janet Mangan, Erin K Graham, Neil M H van Hoogstraten, Hubert Bauer, Deborah Ignacio Vargas, Juan Lee, Eun Bong Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. RESULTS: Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (−3.28 vs −2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02332590. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5530335/ /pubmed/27856432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Burmester, Gerd R
Lin, Yong
Patel, Rahul
van Adelsberg, Janet
Mangan, Erin K
Graham, Neil M H
van Hoogstraten, Hubert
Bauer, Deborah
Ignacio Vargas, Juan
Lee, Eun Bong
Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (monarch): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase iii trial
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310
work_keys_str_mv AT burmestergerdr efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT linyong efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT patelrahul efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT vanadelsbergjanet efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT manganerink efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT grahamneilmh efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT vanhoogstratenhubert efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT bauerdeborah efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT ignaciovargasjuan efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial
AT leeeunbong efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial