Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310 |
_version_ | 1783253248328597504 |
---|---|
author | Burmester, Gerd R Lin, Yong Patel, Rahul van Adelsberg, Janet Mangan, Erin K Graham, Neil M H van Hoogstraten, Hubert Bauer, Deborah Ignacio Vargas, Juan Lee, Eun Bong |
author_facet | Burmester, Gerd R Lin, Yong Patel, Rahul van Adelsberg, Janet Mangan, Erin K Graham, Neil M H van Hoogstraten, Hubert Bauer, Deborah Ignacio Vargas, Juan Lee, Eun Bong |
author_sort | Burmester, Gerd R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. RESULTS: Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (−3.28 vs −2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02332590. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5530335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55303352017-07-31 Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial Burmester, Gerd R Lin, Yong Patel, Rahul van Adelsberg, Janet Mangan, Erin K Graham, Neil M H van Hoogstraten, Hubert Bauer, Deborah Ignacio Vargas, Juan Lee, Eun Bong Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. RESULTS: Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (−3.28 vs −2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02332590. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-05 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5530335/ /pubmed/27856432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Epidemiological Research Burmester, Gerd R Lin, Yong Patel, Rahul van Adelsberg, Janet Mangan, Erin K Graham, Neil M H van Hoogstraten, Hubert Bauer, Deborah Ignacio Vargas, Juan Lee, Eun Bong Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (monarch): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase iii trial |
topic | Clinical and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5530335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burmestergerdr efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT linyong efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT patelrahul efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT vanadelsbergjanet efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT manganerink efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT grahamneilmh efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT vanhoogstratenhubert efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT bauerdeborah efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT ignaciovargasjuan efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial AT leeeunbong efficacyandsafetyofsarilumabmonotherapyversusadalimumabmonotherapyforthetreatmentofpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritismonarcharandomiseddoubleblindparallelgroupphaseiiitrial |