Cargando…

Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)

Through the canonical LC3 interaction motif (LIR), [W/F/Y]‐X(1)‐X(2)‐[I/L/V], protein complexes are recruited to autophagosomes to perform their functions as either autophagy adaptors or receptors. How these adaptors/receptors selectively interact with either LC3 or GABARAP families remains unclear....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogov, Vladimir V, Stolz, Alexandra, Ravichandran, Arvind C, Rios‐Szwed, Diana O, Suzuki, Hironori, Kniss, Andreas, Löhr, Frank, Wakatsuki, Soichi, Dötsch, Volker, Dikic, Ivan, Dobson, Renwick CJ, McEwan, David G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655748
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643587
_version_ 1783254373909921792
author Rogov, Vladimir V
Stolz, Alexandra
Ravichandran, Arvind C
Rios‐Szwed, Diana O
Suzuki, Hironori
Kniss, Andreas
Löhr, Frank
Wakatsuki, Soichi
Dötsch, Volker
Dikic, Ivan
Dobson, Renwick CJ
McEwan, David G
author_facet Rogov, Vladimir V
Stolz, Alexandra
Ravichandran, Arvind C
Rios‐Szwed, Diana O
Suzuki, Hironori
Kniss, Andreas
Löhr, Frank
Wakatsuki, Soichi
Dötsch, Volker
Dikic, Ivan
Dobson, Renwick CJ
McEwan, David G
author_sort Rogov, Vladimir V
collection PubMed
description Through the canonical LC3 interaction motif (LIR), [W/F/Y]‐X(1)‐X(2)‐[I/L/V], protein complexes are recruited to autophagosomes to perform their functions as either autophagy adaptors or receptors. How these adaptors/receptors selectively interact with either LC3 or GABARAP families remains unclear. Herein, we determine the range of selectivity of 30 known core LIR motifs towards individual LC3s and GABARAPs. From these, we define a GABARAP Interaction Motif (GIM) sequence ([W/F]‐[V/I]‐X(2)‐V) that the adaptor protein PLEKHM1 tightly conforms to. Using biophysical and structural approaches, we show that the PLEKHM1‐LIR is indeed 11‐fold more specific for GABARAP than LC3B. Selective mutation of the X(1) and X(2) positions either completely abolished the interaction with all LC3 and GABARAPs or increased PLEKHM1‐GIM selectivity 20‐fold towards LC3B. Finally, we show that conversion of p62/SQSTM1, FUNDC1 and FIP200 LIRs into our newly defined GIM, by introducing two valine residues, enhances their interaction with endogenous GABARAP over LC3B. The identification of a GABARAP‐specific interaction motif will aid the identification and characterization of the expanding array of autophagy receptor and adaptor proteins and their in vivo functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5538626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55386262017-08-04 Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM) Rogov, Vladimir V Stolz, Alexandra Ravichandran, Arvind C Rios‐Szwed, Diana O Suzuki, Hironori Kniss, Andreas Löhr, Frank Wakatsuki, Soichi Dötsch, Volker Dikic, Ivan Dobson, Renwick CJ McEwan, David G EMBO Rep Articles Through the canonical LC3 interaction motif (LIR), [W/F/Y]‐X(1)‐X(2)‐[I/L/V], protein complexes are recruited to autophagosomes to perform their functions as either autophagy adaptors or receptors. How these adaptors/receptors selectively interact with either LC3 or GABARAP families remains unclear. Herein, we determine the range of selectivity of 30 known core LIR motifs towards individual LC3s and GABARAPs. From these, we define a GABARAP Interaction Motif (GIM) sequence ([W/F]‐[V/I]‐X(2)‐V) that the adaptor protein PLEKHM1 tightly conforms to. Using biophysical and structural approaches, we show that the PLEKHM1‐LIR is indeed 11‐fold more specific for GABARAP than LC3B. Selective mutation of the X(1) and X(2) positions either completely abolished the interaction with all LC3 and GABARAPs or increased PLEKHM1‐GIM selectivity 20‐fold towards LC3B. Finally, we show that conversion of p62/SQSTM1, FUNDC1 and FIP200 LIRs into our newly defined GIM, by introducing two valine residues, enhances their interaction with endogenous GABARAP over LC3B. The identification of a GABARAP‐specific interaction motif will aid the identification and characterization of the expanding array of autophagy receptor and adaptor proteins and their in vivo functions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-27 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5538626/ /pubmed/28655748 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643587 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Rogov, Vladimir V
Stolz, Alexandra
Ravichandran, Arvind C
Rios‐Szwed, Diana O
Suzuki, Hironori
Kniss, Andreas
Löhr, Frank
Wakatsuki, Soichi
Dötsch, Volker
Dikic, Ivan
Dobson, Renwick CJ
McEwan, David G
Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title_full Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title_fullStr Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title_full_unstemmed Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title_short Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM)
title_sort structural and functional analysis of the gabarap interaction motif (gim)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655748
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643587
work_keys_str_mv AT rogovvladimirv structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT stolzalexandra structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT ravichandranarvindc structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT riosszweddianao structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT suzukihironori structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT knissandreas structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT lohrfrank structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT wakatsukisoichi structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT dotschvolker structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT dikicivan structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT dobsonrenwickcj structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim
AT mcewandavidg structuralandfunctionalanalysisofthegabarapinteractionmotifgim