Cargando…
Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use
There is great heterogeneity in drug treatment response that is thought to be due to individual-level allelic variation in pharmacogenomic biomarkers. FDA Drug Labels provide information to guide pharmacogenomic biomarker use. Yet, the strength of evidence for clinical validity and clinical utility...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Informatics Association
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28815101 |
_version_ | 1783255137425293312 |
---|---|
author | Chin, Lauren Devine, Beth Baradaran, Sarah Keyloun, Katelyn Canestaro, William Pham, Jonathan |
author_facet | Chin, Lauren Devine, Beth Baradaran, Sarah Keyloun, Katelyn Canestaro, William Pham, Jonathan |
author_sort | Chin, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is great heterogeneity in drug treatment response that is thought to be due to individual-level allelic variation in pharmacogenomic biomarkers. FDA Drug Labels provide information to guide pharmacogenomic biomarker use. Yet, the strength of evidence for clinical validity and clinical utility is lacking. We characterized the strength of evidence and treatment recommendations contained in FDA Drug Labels as of December 2015. Pharmacogenomic biomarker information was provided for 137 drugs, involving 49 pharmacogenomic biomarkers, constituting 166 drug-biomarker pairs. Convincing/adequate evidence of clinical validity was found for 46% of pairs, of clinical utility for 29% of pairs, and of both, for 27% of pairs. Despite evidence of convincing/adequate validity/utility, no treatment recommendation was provided for 37% of pairs. Germline biomarkers represented nearly three-quarters of all drug-biomarker pairs, however, only 29% and 16% of pairs had convincing/adequate evidence for clinical validity and clinical utility, respectively. Separately, somatic biomarkers that serve as molecular targets for targeted therapies, had convincing/adequate evidence for 95% of pairs for clinical validity, and for 67% for clinical utility. The strength of evidence for pharmacogenomic biomarker use is low, underscoring the need for additional research to achieve the promise of precision medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5543369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Medical Informatics Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55433692017-08-16 Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use Chin, Lauren Devine, Beth Baradaran, Sarah Keyloun, Katelyn Canestaro, William Pham, Jonathan AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc Articles There is great heterogeneity in drug treatment response that is thought to be due to individual-level allelic variation in pharmacogenomic biomarkers. FDA Drug Labels provide information to guide pharmacogenomic biomarker use. Yet, the strength of evidence for clinical validity and clinical utility is lacking. We characterized the strength of evidence and treatment recommendations contained in FDA Drug Labels as of December 2015. Pharmacogenomic biomarker information was provided for 137 drugs, involving 49 pharmacogenomic biomarkers, constituting 166 drug-biomarker pairs. Convincing/adequate evidence of clinical validity was found for 46% of pairs, of clinical utility for 29% of pairs, and of both, for 27% of pairs. Despite evidence of convincing/adequate validity/utility, no treatment recommendation was provided for 37% of pairs. Germline biomarkers represented nearly three-quarters of all drug-biomarker pairs, however, only 29% and 16% of pairs had convincing/adequate evidence for clinical validity and clinical utility, respectively. Separately, somatic biomarkers that serve as molecular targets for targeted therapies, had convincing/adequate evidence for 95% of pairs for clinical validity, and for 67% for clinical utility. The strength of evidence for pharmacogenomic biomarker use is low, underscoring the need for additional research to achieve the promise of precision medicine. American Medical Informatics Association 2017-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5543369/ /pubmed/28815101 Text en ©2017 AMIA - All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose |
spellingShingle | Articles Chin, Lauren Devine, Beth Baradaran, Sarah Keyloun, Katelyn Canestaro, William Pham, Jonathan Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title | Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title_full | Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title_fullStr | Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title_short | Characterizing the Strength of Evidence in FDA Labels for Pharmacogenomic Biomarker-Guided Medication Use |
title_sort | characterizing the strength of evidence in fda labels for pharmacogenomic biomarker-guided medication use |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28815101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chinlauren characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse AT devinebeth characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse AT baradaransarah characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse AT keylounkatelyn characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse AT canestarowilliam characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse AT phamjonathan characterizingthestrengthofevidenceinfdalabelsforpharmacogenomicbiomarkerguidedmedicationuse |