Cargando…

Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senna, Gilmar Weber, Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli, Sandy, Daniel, Scudese, Estevão, Bianco, Antonino, Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077
_version_ 1783255794187239424
author Senna, Gilmar Weber
Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli
Sandy, Daniel
Scudese, Estevão
Bianco, Antonino
Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin
author_facet Senna, Gilmar Weber
Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli
Sandy, Daniel
Scudese, Estevão
Bianco, Antonino
Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin
author_sort Senna, Gilmar Weber
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176.75 ± 3.33 cm, 24.53 ± 1.47 kg/m2) performed a test and retest of 1-RM on non-consecutive days. Forty-eight hours after load testing, the participants were randomly assigned to six sessions consisting of four sets of the triceps pull-down, combining different intensities with distinct rest periods between sets. The shorter 1 minute rest promoted a significant reduction in the total repetition number compared to 3 minute rest for both workloads. There was a difference between 3 and 5 minute conditions for the 50% of 1-RM that did not occur for the 80% of 1-RM condition. Both intensities presented significant interaction values for the rest conditions vs. each set (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). Additionally, significant values were found for the main effect of the performance of subsequent sets (50% p = 0.003; 80% p = 0.001) and rest conditions (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for heavier loads (80%) to fatigue, longer rest of 3 to 5 minutes seems to allow for better recovery between sets and thus, promotes a greater volume. However, when training with lighter loads (50%), the magnitude of the rest seems to directly affect the performance of subsequent sets, and also presents a correlation with total volume achieved for the upper body single-joint exercise scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5548167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55481672017-08-21 Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals Senna, Gilmar Weber Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli Sandy, Daniel Scudese, Estevão Bianco, Antonino Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176.75 ± 3.33 cm, 24.53 ± 1.47 kg/m2) performed a test and retest of 1-RM on non-consecutive days. Forty-eight hours after load testing, the participants were randomly assigned to six sessions consisting of four sets of the triceps pull-down, combining different intensities with distinct rest periods between sets. The shorter 1 minute rest promoted a significant reduction in the total repetition number compared to 3 minute rest for both workloads. There was a difference between 3 and 5 minute conditions for the 50% of 1-RM that did not occur for the 80% of 1-RM condition. Both intensities presented significant interaction values for the rest conditions vs. each set (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). Additionally, significant values were found for the main effect of the performance of subsequent sets (50% p = 0.003; 80% p = 0.001) and rest conditions (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for heavier loads (80%) to fatigue, longer rest of 3 to 5 minutes seems to allow for better recovery between sets and thus, promotes a greater volume. However, when training with lighter loads (50%), the magnitude of the rest seems to directly affect the performance of subsequent sets, and also presents a correlation with total volume achieved for the upper body single-joint exercise scheme. De Gruyter Open 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5548167/ /pubmed/28828090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Section III - Sports Training
Senna, Gilmar Weber
Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli
Sandy, Daniel
Scudese, Estevão
Bianco, Antonino
Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin
Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title_full Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title_fullStr Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title_full_unstemmed Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title_short Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
title_sort heavy vs light load single-joint exercise performance with different rest intervals
topic Section III - Sports Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077
work_keys_str_mv AT sennagilmarweber heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals
AT rodriguesbernardominelli heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals
AT sandydaniel heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals
AT scudeseestevao heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals
AT biancoantonino heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals
AT dantasesteliohenriquemartin heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals