Cargando…
Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077 |
_version_ | 1783255794187239424 |
---|---|
author | Senna, Gilmar Weber Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli Sandy, Daniel Scudese, Estevão Bianco, Antonino Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin |
author_facet | Senna, Gilmar Weber Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli Sandy, Daniel Scudese, Estevão Bianco, Antonino Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin |
author_sort | Senna, Gilmar Weber |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176.75 ± 3.33 cm, 24.53 ± 1.47 kg/m2) performed a test and retest of 1-RM on non-consecutive days. Forty-eight hours after load testing, the participants were randomly assigned to six sessions consisting of four sets of the triceps pull-down, combining different intensities with distinct rest periods between sets. The shorter 1 minute rest promoted a significant reduction in the total repetition number compared to 3 minute rest for both workloads. There was a difference between 3 and 5 minute conditions for the 50% of 1-RM that did not occur for the 80% of 1-RM condition. Both intensities presented significant interaction values for the rest conditions vs. each set (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). Additionally, significant values were found for the main effect of the performance of subsequent sets (50% p = 0.003; 80% p = 0.001) and rest conditions (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for heavier loads (80%) to fatigue, longer rest of 3 to 5 minutes seems to allow for better recovery between sets and thus, promotes a greater volume. However, when training with lighter loads (50%), the magnitude of the rest seems to directly affect the performance of subsequent sets, and also presents a correlation with total volume achieved for the upper body single-joint exercise scheme. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55481672017-08-21 Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals Senna, Gilmar Weber Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli Sandy, Daniel Scudese, Estevão Bianco, Antonino Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin J Hum Kinet Section III - Sports Training The aim of the study was to compare the effect of three distinct rest period lengths between sets of upper body single-joint exercise with different load zones and volume designed for either endurance or hypertrophy (50% or 80% of 1-RM). Sixteen trained men (20.75 ± 2.54 years; 76.35 ± 5.03 kg; 176.75 ± 3.33 cm, 24.53 ± 1.47 kg/m2) performed a test and retest of 1-RM on non-consecutive days. Forty-eight hours after load testing, the participants were randomly assigned to six sessions consisting of four sets of the triceps pull-down, combining different intensities with distinct rest periods between sets. The shorter 1 minute rest promoted a significant reduction in the total repetition number compared to 3 minute rest for both workloads. There was a difference between 3 and 5 minute conditions for the 50% of 1-RM that did not occur for the 80% of 1-RM condition. Both intensities presented significant interaction values for the rest conditions vs. each set (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). Additionally, significant values were found for the main effect of the performance of subsequent sets (50% p = 0.003; 80% p = 0.001) and rest conditions (50% p = 0.0001; 80% p = 0.0001). In conclusion, for heavier loads (80%) to fatigue, longer rest of 3 to 5 minutes seems to allow for better recovery between sets and thus, promotes a greater volume. However, when training with lighter loads (50%), the magnitude of the rest seems to directly affect the performance of subsequent sets, and also presents a correlation with total volume achieved for the upper body single-joint exercise scheme. De Gruyter Open 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5548167/ /pubmed/28828090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077 Text en © 2017 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Section III - Sports Training Senna, Gilmar Weber Rodrigues, Bernardo Minelli Sandy, Daniel Scudese, Estevão Bianco, Antonino Dantas, Estélio Henrique Martin Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title | Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title_full | Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title_fullStr | Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title_full_unstemmed | Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title_short | Heavy vs Light Load Single-Joint Exercise Performance with Different Rest Intervals |
title_sort | heavy vs light load single-joint exercise performance with different rest intervals |
topic | Section III - Sports Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sennagilmarweber heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals AT rodriguesbernardominelli heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals AT sandydaniel heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals AT scudeseestevao heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals AT biancoantonino heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals AT dantasesteliohenriquemartin heavyvslightloadsinglejointexerciseperformancewithdifferentrestintervals |