Cargando…
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families”...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 |
_version_ | 1783255862346776576 |
---|---|
author | Rosanova, Antonio Colliva, Alberto Osella, Matteo Caselle, Michele |
author_facet | Rosanova, Antonio Colliva, Alberto Osella, Matteo Caselle, Michele |
author_sort | Rosanova, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5548724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55487242017-08-09 Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes Rosanova, Antonio Colliva, Alberto Osella, Matteo Caselle, Michele Sci Rep Article Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5548724/ /pubmed/28790414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosanova, Antonio Colliva, Alberto Osella, Matteo Caselle, Michele Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title | Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_full | Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_fullStr | Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_short | Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_sort | modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5548724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28790414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosanovaantonio modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT collivaalberto modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT osellamatteo modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT casellemichele modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes |