Cargando…

Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review

This narrative review discusses quantitative indices measuring differences between alphabetic languages that are related to the process of word recognition. The specific orthography that a child is acquiring has been identified as a central element influencing reading acquisition and dyslexia. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borleffs, Elisabeth, Maassen, Ben A. M., Lyytinen, Heikki, Zwarts, Frans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5
_version_ 1783259940939366400
author Borleffs, Elisabeth
Maassen, Ben A. M.
Lyytinen, Heikki
Zwarts, Frans
author_facet Borleffs, Elisabeth
Maassen, Ben A. M.
Lyytinen, Heikki
Zwarts, Frans
author_sort Borleffs, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description This narrative review discusses quantitative indices measuring differences between alphabetic languages that are related to the process of word recognition. The specific orthography that a child is acquiring has been identified as a central element influencing reading acquisition and dyslexia. However, the development of reliable metrics to measure differences between language scripts hasn’t received much attention so far. This paper therefore reviews metrics proposed in the literature for quantifying orthographic transparency, syllabic complexity, and morphological complexity of alphabetic languages. The review included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, and various online sources. Search terms pertained to orthographic transparency, morphological complexity, and syllabic complexity in relation to reading acquisition, and dyslexia. Although the predictive value of these metrics is promising, more research is needed to validate the value of the metrics discussed and to understand the ‘developmental footprint’ of orthographic transparency, morphological complexity, and syllabic complexity in the lexical organization and processing strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5574968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55749682017-09-18 Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review Borleffs, Elisabeth Maassen, Ben A. M. Lyytinen, Heikki Zwarts, Frans Read Writ Article This narrative review discusses quantitative indices measuring differences between alphabetic languages that are related to the process of word recognition. The specific orthography that a child is acquiring has been identified as a central element influencing reading acquisition and dyslexia. However, the development of reliable metrics to measure differences between language scripts hasn’t received much attention so far. This paper therefore reviews metrics proposed in the literature for quantifying orthographic transparency, syllabic complexity, and morphological complexity of alphabetic languages. The review included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, PsychInfo, Google Scholar, and various online sources. Search terms pertained to orthographic transparency, morphological complexity, and syllabic complexity in relation to reading acquisition, and dyslexia. Although the predictive value of these metrics is promising, more research is needed to validate the value of the metrics discussed and to understand the ‘developmental footprint’ of orthographic transparency, morphological complexity, and syllabic complexity in the lexical organization and processing strategies. Springer Netherlands 2017-04-17 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5574968/ /pubmed/28932018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Borleffs, Elisabeth
Maassen, Ben A. M.
Lyytinen, Heikki
Zwarts, Frans
Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title_full Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title_fullStr Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title_short Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
title_sort measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5
work_keys_str_mv AT borleffselisabeth measuringorthographictransparencyandmorphologicalsyllabiccomplexityinalphabeticorthographiesanarrativereview
AT maassenbenam measuringorthographictransparencyandmorphologicalsyllabiccomplexityinalphabeticorthographiesanarrativereview
AT lyytinenheikki measuringorthographictransparencyandmorphologicalsyllabiccomplexityinalphabeticorthographiesanarrativereview
AT zwartsfrans measuringorthographictransparencyandmorphologicalsyllabiccomplexityinalphabeticorthographiesanarrativereview