Cargando…

Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro

Distillers grains are co-products of the corn ethanol industry widely used in animal feed. We examined the effects of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin at low concentrations reflective of those detected in distillers grains on bacterial resistance selection. At 0.1 µg/ml erythromycin, macr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Beilei, Domesle, Kelly J., Yang, Qianru, Young, Shenia R., Rice-Trujillo, Crystal L., Bodeis Jones, Sonya M., Gaines, Stuart A., Keller, Marla W., Li, Xin, Piñeiro, Silvia A., Whitney, Brooke M., Harbottle, Heather C., Gilbert, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09593-4
_version_ 1783262662857064448
author Ge, Beilei
Domesle, Kelly J.
Yang, Qianru
Young, Shenia R.
Rice-Trujillo, Crystal L.
Bodeis Jones, Sonya M.
Gaines, Stuart A.
Keller, Marla W.
Li, Xin
Piñeiro, Silvia A.
Whitney, Brooke M.
Harbottle, Heather C.
Gilbert, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Ge, Beilei
Domesle, Kelly J.
Yang, Qianru
Young, Shenia R.
Rice-Trujillo, Crystal L.
Bodeis Jones, Sonya M.
Gaines, Stuart A.
Keller, Marla W.
Li, Xin
Piñeiro, Silvia A.
Whitney, Brooke M.
Harbottle, Heather C.
Gilbert, Jeffrey M.
author_sort Ge, Beilei
collection PubMed
description Distillers grains are co-products of the corn ethanol industry widely used in animal feed. We examined the effects of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin at low concentrations reflective of those detected in distillers grains on bacterial resistance selection. At 0.1 µg/ml erythromycin, macrolide-resistant mutants were induced in one Campylobacter coli and one Enterococcus faecium strain, while these strains plus three additional C. coli, one additional E. faecium, and one C. jejuni also developed resistance when exposed to 0.25 µg/ml erythromycin. At 0.5 µg/ml erythromycin, a total of eight strains (four Campylobacter and four Enterococcus) obtained macrolide-resistant mutants, including two strains from each genus that were not selected at lower erythromycin concentrations. For penicillin, three of five E. faecium strains but none of five Enterococcus faecalis strains consistently developed resistance at all three selection concentrations. Virginiamycin at two M(1):S(1) ratios did not induce resistance development in four out of five E. faecium strains; however, increased resistance was observed in the fifth one under 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml virginiamycin selections. Although not yet tested in vivo, these findings suggest a potential risk of stimulating bacterial resistance development in the animal gut when distillers grains containing certain antibiotic residues are used in animal feed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5591201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55912012017-09-13 Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro Ge, Beilei Domesle, Kelly J. Yang, Qianru Young, Shenia R. Rice-Trujillo, Crystal L. Bodeis Jones, Sonya M. Gaines, Stuart A. Keller, Marla W. Li, Xin Piñeiro, Silvia A. Whitney, Brooke M. Harbottle, Heather C. Gilbert, Jeffrey M. Sci Rep Article Distillers grains are co-products of the corn ethanol industry widely used in animal feed. We examined the effects of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin at low concentrations reflective of those detected in distillers grains on bacterial resistance selection. At 0.1 µg/ml erythromycin, macrolide-resistant mutants were induced in one Campylobacter coli and one Enterococcus faecium strain, while these strains plus three additional C. coli, one additional E. faecium, and one C. jejuni also developed resistance when exposed to 0.25 µg/ml erythromycin. At 0.5 µg/ml erythromycin, a total of eight strains (four Campylobacter and four Enterococcus) obtained macrolide-resistant mutants, including two strains from each genus that were not selected at lower erythromycin concentrations. For penicillin, three of five E. faecium strains but none of five Enterococcus faecalis strains consistently developed resistance at all three selection concentrations. Virginiamycin at two M(1):S(1) ratios did not induce resistance development in four out of five E. faecium strains; however, increased resistance was observed in the fifth one under 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml virginiamycin selections. Although not yet tested in vivo, these findings suggest a potential risk of stimulating bacterial resistance development in the animal gut when distillers grains containing certain antibiotic residues are used in animal feed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5591201/ /pubmed/28887450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09593-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ge, Beilei
Domesle, Kelly J.
Yang, Qianru
Young, Shenia R.
Rice-Trujillo, Crystal L.
Bodeis Jones, Sonya M.
Gaines, Stuart A.
Keller, Marla W.
Li, Xin
Piñeiro, Silvia A.
Whitney, Brooke M.
Harbottle, Heather C.
Gilbert, Jeffrey M.
Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title_full Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title_fullStr Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title_short Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
title_sort effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5591201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09593-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gebeilei effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT domeslekellyj effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT yangqianru effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT youngsheniar effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT ricetrujillocrystall effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT bodeisjonessonyam effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT gainesstuarta effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT kellermarlaw effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT lixin effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT pineirosilviaa effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT whitneybrookem effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT harbottleheatherc effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro
AT gilbertjeffreym effectsoflowconcentrationsoferythromycinpenicillinandvirginiamycinonbacterialresistancedevelopmentinvitro