Cargando…
Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study
BACKGROUND: Outcome- or competency-based education is well established in medical and health sciences education. Curricula are based on courses where students develop their competences and assessment is also usually course-based. Clinical reasoning is an important competence, and the aim of this stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1002-4 |
_version_ | 1783263232106954752 |
---|---|
author | Orban, Kristina Ekelin, Maria Edgren, Gudrun Sandgren, Olof Hovbrandt, Pia Persson, Eva K. |
author_facet | Orban, Kristina Ekelin, Maria Edgren, Gudrun Sandgren, Olof Hovbrandt, Pia Persson, Eva K. |
author_sort | Orban, Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Outcome- or competency-based education is well established in medical and health sciences education. Curricula are based on courses where students develop their competences and assessment is also usually course-based. Clinical reasoning is an important competence, and the aim of this study was to monitor and describe students’ progression in professional clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using observations of group discussions following the case method. METHODS: In this qualitative study students from three different health education programmes were observed while discussing clinical cases in a modified Harvard case method session. A rubric with four dimensions – problem-solving process, disciplinary knowledge, character of discussion and communication – was used as an observational tool to identify clinical reasoning. A deductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS: The results revealed the students’ transition over time from reasoning based strictly on theoretical knowledge to reasoning ability characterized by clinical considerations and experiences. Students who were approaching the end of their education immediately identified the most important problem and then focused on this in their discussion. Practice knowledge increased over time, which was seen as progression in the use of professional language, concepts, terms and the use of prior clinical experience. The character of the discussion evolved from theoretical considerations early in the education to clinical reasoning in later years. Communication within the groups was supportive and conducted with a professional tone. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations revealed progression in several aspects of students’ clinical reasoning skills on a group level in their discussions of clinical cases. We suggest that the case method can be a useful tool in assessing quality in health sciences education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5594584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55945842017-09-15 Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study Orban, Kristina Ekelin, Maria Edgren, Gudrun Sandgren, Olof Hovbrandt, Pia Persson, Eva K. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Outcome- or competency-based education is well established in medical and health sciences education. Curricula are based on courses where students develop their competences and assessment is also usually course-based. Clinical reasoning is an important competence, and the aim of this study was to monitor and describe students’ progression in professional clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using observations of group discussions following the case method. METHODS: In this qualitative study students from three different health education programmes were observed while discussing clinical cases in a modified Harvard case method session. A rubric with four dimensions – problem-solving process, disciplinary knowledge, character of discussion and communication – was used as an observational tool to identify clinical reasoning. A deductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS: The results revealed the students’ transition over time from reasoning based strictly on theoretical knowledge to reasoning ability characterized by clinical considerations and experiences. Students who were approaching the end of their education immediately identified the most important problem and then focused on this in their discussion. Practice knowledge increased over time, which was seen as progression in the use of professional language, concepts, terms and the use of prior clinical experience. The character of the discussion evolved from theoretical considerations early in the education to clinical reasoning in later years. Communication within the groups was supportive and conducted with a professional tone. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations revealed progression in several aspects of students’ clinical reasoning skills on a group level in their discussions of clinical cases. We suggest that the case method can be a useful tool in assessing quality in health sciences education. BioMed Central 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5594584/ /pubmed/28893238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1002-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Orban, Kristina Ekelin, Maria Edgren, Gudrun Sandgren, Olof Hovbrandt, Pia Persson, Eva K. Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title | Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title_full | Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title_fullStr | Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title_short | Monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
title_sort | monitoring progression of clinical reasoning skills during health sciences education using the case method – a qualitative observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5594584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1002-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orbankristina monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy AT ekelinmaria monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy AT edgrengudrun monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy AT sandgrenolof monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy AT hovbrandtpia monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy AT perssonevak monitoringprogressionofclinicalreasoningskillsduringhealthscienceseducationusingthecasemethodaqualitativeobservationalstudy |