Cargando…

Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage

The viability of probiotics in non-dairy food products during storage is required to meet content criteria for probiotic products. This study investigated whether non-dairy foods could be matrices for probiotics. Selected probiotic bacteria were coated on non-dairy foods under two storage conditions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Min, Bunt, Craig R., Mason, Susan L., Bennett, Grant N., Hussain, Malik A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5030043
_version_ 1783267629307265024
author Min, Min
Bunt, Craig R.
Mason, Susan L.
Bennett, Grant N.
Hussain, Malik A.
author_facet Min, Min
Bunt, Craig R.
Mason, Susan L.
Bennett, Grant N.
Hussain, Malik A.
author_sort Min, Min
collection PubMed
description The viability of probiotics in non-dairy food products during storage is required to meet content criteria for probiotic products. This study investigated whether non-dairy foods could be matrices for probiotics. Selected probiotic bacteria were coated on non-dairy foods under two storage conditions, and viabilities were assessed. The non-dairy foods were coated with 5–7 log cfu g(−1) of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC4356(T), Lactobacillus plantarum RC30, and Bifidobacterium longum ATCC15707(T). The coated non-dairy foods were stored at 20 °C and 20% relative humidity (RH) or 30 °C and 50% RH. Viability of probiotic bacteria was determined after 0, 2, and 4 weeks of storage. B. longum showed the highest survival at week 4 of 6.5–6.7 log cfu g(−1) on wheat bran and oat, compared with 3.7–3.9 log cfu g(−1) of L. acidophilus and 4.2–4.8 log cfu g(−1) of L. plantarum at 20 °C 20% RH. Under the storage conditions of 30 °C 50% RH, survival of 4.5 log cfu g(−1) of B. longum was also found on oat and peanut. This was two and four times higher than the population of L. acidophilus and L. plantarum, respectively. The results suggest that probiotics can survive on non-dairy foods under ambient storage conditions. However, the storage conditions, food matrices, and probiotic strains should be carefully chosen to maximize probiotic bacteria survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5620634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56206342017-10-03 Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage Min, Min Bunt, Craig R. Mason, Susan L. Bennett, Grant N. Hussain, Malik A. Microorganisms Article The viability of probiotics in non-dairy food products during storage is required to meet content criteria for probiotic products. This study investigated whether non-dairy foods could be matrices for probiotics. Selected probiotic bacteria were coated on non-dairy foods under two storage conditions, and viabilities were assessed. The non-dairy foods were coated with 5–7 log cfu g(−1) of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC4356(T), Lactobacillus plantarum RC30, and Bifidobacterium longum ATCC15707(T). The coated non-dairy foods were stored at 20 °C and 20% relative humidity (RH) or 30 °C and 50% RH. Viability of probiotic bacteria was determined after 0, 2, and 4 weeks of storage. B. longum showed the highest survival at week 4 of 6.5–6.7 log cfu g(−1) on wheat bran and oat, compared with 3.7–3.9 log cfu g(−1) of L. acidophilus and 4.2–4.8 log cfu g(−1) of L. plantarum at 20 °C 20% RH. Under the storage conditions of 30 °C 50% RH, survival of 4.5 log cfu g(−1) of B. longum was also found on oat and peanut. This was two and four times higher than the population of L. acidophilus and L. plantarum, respectively. The results suggest that probiotics can survive on non-dairy foods under ambient storage conditions. However, the storage conditions, food matrices, and probiotic strains should be carefully chosen to maximize probiotic bacteria survival. MDPI 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5620634/ /pubmed/28763015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5030043 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Min, Min
Bunt, Craig R.
Mason, Susan L.
Bennett, Grant N.
Hussain, Malik A.
Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title_full Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title_fullStr Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title_short Effect of Non-Dairy Food Matrices on the Survival of Probiotic Bacteria during Storage
title_sort effect of non-dairy food matrices on the survival of probiotic bacteria during storage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28763015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5030043
work_keys_str_mv AT minmin effectofnondairyfoodmatricesonthesurvivalofprobioticbacteriaduringstorage
AT buntcraigr effectofnondairyfoodmatricesonthesurvivalofprobioticbacteriaduringstorage
AT masonsusanl effectofnondairyfoodmatricesonthesurvivalofprobioticbacteriaduringstorage
AT bennettgrantn effectofnondairyfoodmatricesonthesurvivalofprobioticbacteriaduringstorage
AT hussainmalika effectofnondairyfoodmatricesonthesurvivalofprobioticbacteriaduringstorage