Cargando…
An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28902150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103 |
_version_ | 1783267692325634048 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guanglei Wang, Junbo Chen, Deyong Chen, Jian Chen, Lianhong Xu, Chao |
author_facet | Li, Guanglei Wang, Junbo Chen, Deyong Chen, Jian Chen, Lianhong Xu, Chao |
author_sort | Li, Guanglei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This paper presents a micro-fabricated electrochemical seismic sensor with a force-balanced negative feedback system, mainly composed of a sensing unit including porous sensing micro electrodes immersed in an electrolyte solution and a feedback unit including a feedback circuit and a feedback magnet. In this study, devices were designed, fabricated, and characterized, producing comparable performances among individual devices. In addition, bandwidths and total harmonic distortions of the proposed devices with and without a negative feedback system were quantified and compared as 0.005–20 (feedback) Hz vs. 0.3–7 Hz (without feedback), 4.34 ± 0.38% (without feedback) vs. 1.81 ± 0.31% (feedback)@1 Hz@1 mm/s and 3.21 ± 0.25% (without feedback) vs. 1.13 ± 0.19% (feedback)@5 Hz@1 mm/s (n(device) = 6, n represents the number of the tested devices), respectively. In addition, the performances of the proposed MEMS electrochemical seismometers with feedback were compared to a commercial electrochemical seismic sensor (CME 6011), producing higher bandwidth (0.005–20 Hz vs. 0.016–30 Hz) and lower self-noise levels (−165.1 ± 6.1 dB vs. −137.7 dB at 0.1 Hz, −151.9 ± 7.5 dB vs. −117.8 dB at 0.02 Hz (n(device) = 6)) in the low-frequency domain. Thus, the proposed device may function as an enabling electrochemical seismometer in the fields requesting seismic monitoring at the ultra-low frequency domain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5621127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56211272017-10-03 An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System Li, Guanglei Wang, Junbo Chen, Deyong Chen, Jian Chen, Lianhong Xu, Chao Sensors (Basel) Article Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This paper presents a micro-fabricated electrochemical seismic sensor with a force-balanced negative feedback system, mainly composed of a sensing unit including porous sensing micro electrodes immersed in an electrolyte solution and a feedback unit including a feedback circuit and a feedback magnet. In this study, devices were designed, fabricated, and characterized, producing comparable performances among individual devices. In addition, bandwidths and total harmonic distortions of the proposed devices with and without a negative feedback system were quantified and compared as 0.005–20 (feedback) Hz vs. 0.3–7 Hz (without feedback), 4.34 ± 0.38% (without feedback) vs. 1.81 ± 0.31% (feedback)@1 Hz@1 mm/s and 3.21 ± 0.25% (without feedback) vs. 1.13 ± 0.19% (feedback)@5 Hz@1 mm/s (n(device) = 6, n represents the number of the tested devices), respectively. In addition, the performances of the proposed MEMS electrochemical seismometers with feedback were compared to a commercial electrochemical seismic sensor (CME 6011), producing higher bandwidth (0.005–20 Hz vs. 0.016–30 Hz) and lower self-noise levels (−165.1 ± 6.1 dB vs. −137.7 dB at 0.1 Hz, −151.9 ± 7.5 dB vs. −117.8 dB at 0.02 Hz (n(device) = 6)) in the low-frequency domain. Thus, the proposed device may function as an enabling electrochemical seismometer in the fields requesting seismic monitoring at the ultra-low frequency domain. MDPI 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5621127/ /pubmed/28902150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Guanglei Wang, Junbo Chen, Deyong Chen, Jian Chen, Lianhong Xu, Chao An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title | An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title_full | An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title_fullStr | An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title_full_unstemmed | An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title_short | An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System |
title_sort | electrochemical, low-frequency seismic micro-sensor based on mems with a force-balanced feedback system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28902150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguanglei anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT wangjunbo anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chendeyong anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chenjian anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chenlianhong anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT xuchao anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT liguanglei electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT wangjunbo electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chendeyong electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chenjian electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT chenlianhong electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem AT xuchao electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem |