Cargando…

An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System

Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Guanglei, Wang, Junbo, Chen, Deyong, Chen, Jian, Chen, Lianhong, Xu, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28902150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103
_version_ 1783267692325634048
author Li, Guanglei
Wang, Junbo
Chen, Deyong
Chen, Jian
Chen, Lianhong
Xu, Chao
author_facet Li, Guanglei
Wang, Junbo
Chen, Deyong
Chen, Jian
Chen, Lianhong
Xu, Chao
author_sort Li, Guanglei
collection PubMed
description Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This paper presents a micro-fabricated electrochemical seismic sensor with a force-balanced negative feedback system, mainly composed of a sensing unit including porous sensing micro electrodes immersed in an electrolyte solution and a feedback unit including a feedback circuit and a feedback magnet. In this study, devices were designed, fabricated, and characterized, producing comparable performances among individual devices. In addition, bandwidths and total harmonic distortions of the proposed devices with and without a negative feedback system were quantified and compared as 0.005–20 (feedback) Hz vs. 0.3–7 Hz (without feedback), 4.34 ± 0.38% (without feedback) vs. 1.81 ± 0.31% (feedback)@1 Hz@1 mm/s and 3.21 ± 0.25% (without feedback) vs. 1.13 ± 0.19% (feedback)@5 Hz@1 mm/s (n(device) = 6, n represents the number of the tested devices), respectively. In addition, the performances of the proposed MEMS electrochemical seismometers with feedback were compared to a commercial electrochemical seismic sensor (CME 6011), producing higher bandwidth (0.005–20 Hz vs. 0.016–30 Hz) and lower self-noise levels (−165.1 ± 6.1 dB vs. −137.7 dB at 0.1 Hz, −151.9 ± 7.5 dB vs. −117.8 dB at 0.02 Hz (n(device) = 6)) in the low-frequency domain. Thus, the proposed device may function as an enabling electrochemical seismometer in the fields requesting seismic monitoring at the ultra-low frequency domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5621127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56211272017-10-03 An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System Li, Guanglei Wang, Junbo Chen, Deyong Chen, Jian Chen, Lianhong Xu, Chao Sensors (Basel) Article Electrochemical seismic sensors are key components in monitoring ground vibration, which are featured with high performances in the low-frequency domain. However, conventional electrochemical seismic sensors suffer from low repeatability due to limitations in fabrication and limited bandwidth. This paper presents a micro-fabricated electrochemical seismic sensor with a force-balanced negative feedback system, mainly composed of a sensing unit including porous sensing micro electrodes immersed in an electrolyte solution and a feedback unit including a feedback circuit and a feedback magnet. In this study, devices were designed, fabricated, and characterized, producing comparable performances among individual devices. In addition, bandwidths and total harmonic distortions of the proposed devices with and without a negative feedback system were quantified and compared as 0.005–20 (feedback) Hz vs. 0.3–7 Hz (without feedback), 4.34 ± 0.38% (without feedback) vs. 1.81 ± 0.31% (feedback)@1 Hz@1 mm/s and 3.21 ± 0.25% (without feedback) vs. 1.13 ± 0.19% (feedback)@5 Hz@1 mm/s (n(device) = 6, n represents the number of the tested devices), respectively. In addition, the performances of the proposed MEMS electrochemical seismometers with feedback were compared to a commercial electrochemical seismic sensor (CME 6011), producing higher bandwidth (0.005–20 Hz vs. 0.016–30 Hz) and lower self-noise levels (−165.1 ± 6.1 dB vs. −137.7 dB at 0.1 Hz, −151.9 ± 7.5 dB vs. −117.8 dB at 0.02 Hz (n(device) = 6)) in the low-frequency domain. Thus, the proposed device may function as an enabling electrochemical seismometer in the fields requesting seismic monitoring at the ultra-low frequency domain. MDPI 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5621127/ /pubmed/28902150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Guanglei
Wang, Junbo
Chen, Deyong
Chen, Jian
Chen, Lianhong
Xu, Chao
An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title_full An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title_fullStr An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title_full_unstemmed An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title_short An Electrochemical, Low-Frequency Seismic Micro-Sensor Based on MEMS with a Force-Balanced Feedback System
title_sort electrochemical, low-frequency seismic micro-sensor based on mems with a force-balanced feedback system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28902150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092103
work_keys_str_mv AT liguanglei anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT wangjunbo anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chendeyong anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chenjian anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chenlianhong anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT xuchao anelectrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT liguanglei electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT wangjunbo electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chendeyong electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chenjian electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT chenlianhong electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem
AT xuchao electrochemicallowfrequencyseismicmicrosensorbasedonmemswithaforcebalancedfeedbacksystem