Cargando…

Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of publish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiller, Jocelyn Huang, Beck Dallaghan, Gary L., Kind, Terry, McLauchlan, Heather, Gigante, Joseph, Smith, Sherilyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5624422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983196
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.134
_version_ 1783268237282115584
author Schiller, Jocelyn Huang
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Kind, Terry
McLauchlan, Heather
Gigante, Joseph
Smith, Sherilyn
author_facet Schiller, Jocelyn Huang
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Kind, Terry
McLauchlan, Heather
Gigante, Joseph
Smith, Sherilyn
author_sort Schiller, Jocelyn Huang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of published, peer-reviewed multi-institutional health sciences education research to inform educators who are considering such projects. METHODS: Two medical librarians searched MEDLINE, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for English-language studies published between 2004 and 2013 using keyword terms related to multi-institutional systems and health sciences education. Teams of two authors reviewed each study and resolved coding discrepancies through consensus. Collected data points included funding, research network involvement, author characteristics, learner characteristics, and research methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen of 310 articles met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (53%) studies received external and/or internal financial support (87% listed external funding, 37% listed internal funding). Forty-five funded studies involved graduate medical education programs. Twenty (17%) studies involved a research or education network. Eighty-five (89%) publications listed an author with a master’s degree or doctoral degree. Ninety-two (78%) studies were descriptive, whereas 26 studies (22%) were experimental. The reported study outcomes were changes in student attitude (38%; n=44), knowledge (26%; n=31), or skill assessment (23%; n=27), as well as patient outcomes (9%; n=11). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-institutional descriptive studies reporting knowledge or attitude outcomes are highly published. Our findings indicate that funding resources are not essential to successfully undertake multi-institutional projects. Funded studies were more likely to originate from graduate medical or nursing programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5624422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medical Library Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56244222017-10-05 Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review Schiller, Jocelyn Huang Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Kind, Terry McLauchlan, Heather Gigante, Joseph Smith, Sherilyn J Med Libr Assoc Paper OBJECTIVES: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of published, peer-reviewed multi-institutional health sciences education research to inform educators who are considering such projects. METHODS: Two medical librarians searched MEDLINE, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for English-language studies published between 2004 and 2013 using keyword terms related to multi-institutional systems and health sciences education. Teams of two authors reviewed each study and resolved coding discrepancies through consensus. Collected data points included funding, research network involvement, author characteristics, learner characteristics, and research methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen of 310 articles met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (53%) studies received external and/or internal financial support (87% listed external funding, 37% listed internal funding). Forty-five funded studies involved graduate medical education programs. Twenty (17%) studies involved a research or education network. Eighty-five (89%) publications listed an author with a master’s degree or doctoral degree. Ninety-two (78%) studies were descriptive, whereas 26 studies (22%) were experimental. The reported study outcomes were changes in student attitude (38%; n=44), knowledge (26%; n=31), or skill assessment (23%; n=27), as well as patient outcomes (9%; n=11). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-institutional descriptive studies reporting knowledge or attitude outcomes are highly published. Our findings indicate that funding resources are not essential to successfully undertake multi-institutional projects. Funded studies were more likely to originate from graduate medical or nursing programs. Medical Library Association 2017-10 2017-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5624422/ /pubmed/28983196 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.134 Text en Copyright: © 2017, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paper
Schiller, Jocelyn Huang
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Kind, Terry
McLauchlan, Heather
Gigante, Joseph
Smith, Sherilyn
Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_full Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_fullStr Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_short Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_sort characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5624422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28983196
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.134
work_keys_str_mv AT schillerjocelynhuang characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT beckdallaghangaryl characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT kindterry characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT mclauchlanheather characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT gigantejoseph characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT smithsherilyn characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview