Cargando…
On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
When solubilized in a hexacarboxamide cryptand anion receptor, the peroxide dianion reacts rapidly with CO(2) in polar aprotic organic media to produce hydroperoxycarbonate (HOOCO(2) (–)) and peroxydicarbonate ((–)O(2)COOCO(2) (–)). Peroxydicarbonate is subject to thermal fragmentation into two equi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal Society of Chemistry
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc01230f |
_version_ | 1783268414969610240 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Shiyu Nava, Matthew J. Chow, Gary K. Lopez, Nazario Wu, Gang Britt, David R. Nocera, Daniel G. Cummins, Christopher C. |
author_facet | Zhang, Shiyu Nava, Matthew J. Chow, Gary K. Lopez, Nazario Wu, Gang Britt, David R. Nocera, Daniel G. Cummins, Christopher C. |
author_sort | Zhang, Shiyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | When solubilized in a hexacarboxamide cryptand anion receptor, the peroxide dianion reacts rapidly with CO(2) in polar aprotic organic media to produce hydroperoxycarbonate (HOOCO(2) (–)) and peroxydicarbonate ((–)O(2)COOCO(2) (–)). Peroxydicarbonate is subject to thermal fragmentation into two equivalents of the highly reactive carbonate radical anion, which promotes hydrogen atom abstraction reactions responsible for the oxidative degradation of organic solvents. The activation and conversion of the peroxide dianion by CO(2) is general. Exposure of solid lithium peroxide (Li(2)O(2)) to CO(2) in polar aprotic organic media results in aggressive oxidation. These findings indicate that CO(2) must not be introduced in conditions relevant to typical lithium–O(2) cell configurations, as production of HOOCO(2) (–) and (–)O(2)COOCO(2) (–) during lithium–O(2) cell cycling will lead to cell degradation via oxidation of organic electrolytes and other vulnerable cell components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5625616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56256162017-10-06 On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2) Zhang, Shiyu Nava, Matthew J. Chow, Gary K. Lopez, Nazario Wu, Gang Britt, David R. Nocera, Daniel G. Cummins, Christopher C. Chem Sci Chemistry When solubilized in a hexacarboxamide cryptand anion receptor, the peroxide dianion reacts rapidly with CO(2) in polar aprotic organic media to produce hydroperoxycarbonate (HOOCO(2) (–)) and peroxydicarbonate ((–)O(2)COOCO(2) (–)). Peroxydicarbonate is subject to thermal fragmentation into two equivalents of the highly reactive carbonate radical anion, which promotes hydrogen atom abstraction reactions responsible for the oxidative degradation of organic solvents. The activation and conversion of the peroxide dianion by CO(2) is general. Exposure of solid lithium peroxide (Li(2)O(2)) to CO(2) in polar aprotic organic media results in aggressive oxidation. These findings indicate that CO(2) must not be introduced in conditions relevant to typical lithium–O(2) cell configurations, as production of HOOCO(2) (–) and (–)O(2)COOCO(2) (–) during lithium–O(2) cell cycling will lead to cell degradation via oxidation of organic electrolytes and other vulnerable cell components. Royal Society of Chemistry 2017-09-01 2017-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5625616/ /pubmed/28989641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc01230f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Zhang, Shiyu Nava, Matthew J. Chow, Gary K. Lopez, Nazario Wu, Gang Britt, David R. Nocera, Daniel G. Cummins, Christopher C. On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2) |
title | On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
|
title_full | On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
|
title_fullStr | On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
|
title_full_unstemmed | On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
|
title_short | On the incompatibility of lithium–O(2) battery technology with CO(2)
|
title_sort | on the incompatibility of lithium–o(2) battery technology with co(2) |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc01230f |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangshiyu ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT navamatthewj ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT chowgaryk ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT lopeznazario ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT wugang ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT brittdavidr ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT noceradanielg ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 AT cumminschristopherc ontheincompatibilityoflithiumo2batterytechnologywithco2 |