Cargando…
Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withs...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807 |
_version_ | 1783268920052940800 |
---|---|
author | Deckers, Jan |
author_facet | Deckers, Jan |
author_sort | Deckers, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5628628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56286282017-10-17 Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health Deckers, Jan J Eval Clin Pract Debates In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-04 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5628628/ /pubmed/28776902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debates Deckers, Jan Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title | Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title_full | Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title_fullStr | Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title_full_unstemmed | Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title_short | Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
title_sort | why “animal (de)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health |
topic | Debates |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deckersjan whyanimaldeliberationsurvivesearlycriticismandispivotaltopublichealth |