Cargando…

Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health

In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Deckers, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807
_version_ 1783268920052940800
author Deckers, Jan
author_facet Deckers, Jan
author_sort Deckers, Jan
collection PubMed
description In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56286282017-10-17 Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health Deckers, Jan J Eval Clin Pract Debates In 2016, the book Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? was published. This article aims to engage with the critique that this book has received and to clarify and reinforce its importance for human health. It is argued that the ideas developed in the book withstand critical scrutiny. As qualified moral veganism avoids the pitfalls of other moral positions on human diets, public health policies must be altered accordingly, subject to adequate political support for its associated vegan project. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-04 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5628628/ /pubmed/28776902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debates
Deckers, Jan
Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title_full Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title_fullStr Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title_full_unstemmed Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title_short Why “Animal (De)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
title_sort why “animal (de)liberation” survives early criticism and is pivotal to public health
topic Debates
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28776902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12807
work_keys_str_mv AT deckersjan whyanimaldeliberationsurvivesearlycriticismandispivotaltopublichealth