Cargando…
Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology
Most monoclonal antibodies in oncology are administered in body–size‐based dosing schedules. This is believed to correct for variability in both drug distribution and elimination between patients. However, monoclonal antibodies typically distribute to the blood plasma and extracellular fluids only,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AlphaMed Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0167 |
_version_ | 1783270159513812992 |
---|---|
author | Hendrikx, Jeroen J.M.A. Haanen, John B.A.G. Voest, Emile E. Schellens, Jan H.M. Huitema, Alwin D.R. Beijnen, Jos H. |
author_facet | Hendrikx, Jeroen J.M.A. Haanen, John B.A.G. Voest, Emile E. Schellens, Jan H.M. Huitema, Alwin D.R. Beijnen, Jos H. |
author_sort | Hendrikx, Jeroen J.M.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most monoclonal antibodies in oncology are administered in body–size‐based dosing schedules. This is believed to correct for variability in both drug distribution and elimination between patients. However, monoclonal antibodies typically distribute to the blood plasma and extracellular fluids only, which increase less than proportionally with the increase in body weight. Elimination takes place via proteolytic catabolism, a nonspecific immunoglobulin G elimination pathway, and intracellular degradation after binding to the target. The latter is the primary route of elimination and is related to target expression levels rather than body size. Taken together, the minor effects of body size on distribution and elimination of monoclonal antibodies and their usually wide therapeutic window do not support body–size‐based dosing. We evaluated effects of body weight on volume of distribution and clearance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology and show that a fixed dose for most of these drugs is justified based on pharmacokinetics. A survey of the savings after fixed dosing of monoclonal antibodies at our hospital showed that fixed dosing can reduce costs of health care, especially when pooling of preparations is not possible (which is often the case in smaller hospitals). In conclusion, based on pharmacokinetic parameters of monoclonal antibodies, there is a rationale for fixed dosing of these drugs in oncology. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing is justified and can improve efficiency of the compounding. Moreover, drug spillage can be reduced and medication errors may become less likely. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The currently available knowledge of elimination of monoclonal antibodies combined with the publicly available data from clinical trials and extensive population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling justifies fixed dosing. Interpatient variation in exposure is comparable after body weight and fixed dosing and most monoclonal antibodies show relatively flat dose‐response relationships. For monoclonal antibodies, this results in wide therapeutic windows and no reduced clinical efficacy after fixed dosing. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing at a well‐selected dose can increase medication safety and help in reduction of costs of health care without the loss of efficacy or safety margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5634778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | AlphaMed Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56347782018-10-01 Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology Hendrikx, Jeroen J.M.A. Haanen, John B.A.G. Voest, Emile E. Schellens, Jan H.M. Huitema, Alwin D.R. Beijnen, Jos H. Oncologist New Drug Development and Clinical Pharmacology Most monoclonal antibodies in oncology are administered in body–size‐based dosing schedules. This is believed to correct for variability in both drug distribution and elimination between patients. However, monoclonal antibodies typically distribute to the blood plasma and extracellular fluids only, which increase less than proportionally with the increase in body weight. Elimination takes place via proteolytic catabolism, a nonspecific immunoglobulin G elimination pathway, and intracellular degradation after binding to the target. The latter is the primary route of elimination and is related to target expression levels rather than body size. Taken together, the minor effects of body size on distribution and elimination of monoclonal antibodies and their usually wide therapeutic window do not support body–size‐based dosing. We evaluated effects of body weight on volume of distribution and clearance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology and show that a fixed dose for most of these drugs is justified based on pharmacokinetics. A survey of the savings after fixed dosing of monoclonal antibodies at our hospital showed that fixed dosing can reduce costs of health care, especially when pooling of preparations is not possible (which is often the case in smaller hospitals). In conclusion, based on pharmacokinetic parameters of monoclonal antibodies, there is a rationale for fixed dosing of these drugs in oncology. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing is justified and can improve efficiency of the compounding. Moreover, drug spillage can be reduced and medication errors may become less likely. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The currently available knowledge of elimination of monoclonal antibodies combined with the publicly available data from clinical trials and extensive population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling justifies fixed dosing. Interpatient variation in exposure is comparable after body weight and fixed dosing and most monoclonal antibodies show relatively flat dose‐response relationships. For monoclonal antibodies, this results in wide therapeutic windows and no reduced clinical efficacy after fixed dosing. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing at a well‐selected dose can increase medication safety and help in reduction of costs of health care without the loss of efficacy or safety margins. AlphaMed Press 2017-07-28 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5634778/ /pubmed/28754722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0167 Text en © 2017 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | New Drug Development and Clinical Pharmacology Hendrikx, Jeroen J.M.A. Haanen, John B.A.G. Voest, Emile E. Schellens, Jan H.M. Huitema, Alwin D.R. Beijnen, Jos H. Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title | Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title_full | Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title_fullStr | Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title_short | Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology |
title_sort | fixed dosing of monoclonal antibodies in oncology |
topic | New Drug Development and Clinical Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendrikxjeroenjma fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology AT haanenjohnbag fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology AT voestemilee fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology AT schellensjanhm fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology AT huitemaalwindr fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology AT beijnenjosh fixeddosingofmonoclonalantibodiesinoncology |