Cargando…

Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response

Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Recacha, E., Machuca, J., Díaz de Alba, P., Ramos-Güelfo, M., Docobo-Pérez, F., Rodriguez-Beltrán, J., Blázquez, J., Pascual, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17
_version_ 1783270339176824832
author Recacha, E.
Machuca, J.
Díaz de Alba, P.
Ramos-Güelfo, M.
Docobo-Pérez, F.
Rodriguez-Beltrán, J.
Blázquez, J.
Pascual, A.
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M.
author_facet Recacha, E.
Machuca, J.
Díaz de Alba, P.
Ramos-Güelfo, M.
Docobo-Pérez, F.
Rodriguez-Beltrán, J.
Blázquez, J.
Pascual, A.
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M.
author_sort Recacha, E.
collection PubMed
description Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance. E. coli mutants exhibiting a spectrum of SOS activity were constructed from isogenic strains carrying quinolone resistance mechanisms with susceptible and resistant phenotypes. Changes in susceptibility were evaluated by static (MICs) and dynamic (killing curves or flow cytometry) methodologies. A peritoneal sepsis murine model was used to evaluate in vivo impact. Suppression of the SOS response was capable of resensitizing mutant strains with genes encoding three or four different resistance mechanisms (up to 15-fold reductions in MICs). Killing curve assays showed a clear disadvantage for survival (Δlog(10) CFU per milliliter [CFU/ml] of 8 log units after 24 h), and the in vivo efficacy of ciprofloxacin was significantly enhanced (Δlog(10) CFU/g of 1.76 log units) in resistant strains with a suppressed SOS response. This effect was evident even after short periods (60 min) of exposure. Suppression of the SOS response reverses antimicrobial resistance across a range of E. coli phenotypes from reduced susceptibility to highly resistant, playing a significant role in increasing the in vivo efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56356862017-10-13 Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response Recacha, E. Machuca, J. Díaz de Alba, P. Ramos-Güelfo, M. Docobo-Pérez, F. Rodriguez-Beltrán, J. Blázquez, J. Pascual, A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M. mBio Research Article Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance. E. coli mutants exhibiting a spectrum of SOS activity were constructed from isogenic strains carrying quinolone resistance mechanisms with susceptible and resistant phenotypes. Changes in susceptibility were evaluated by static (MICs) and dynamic (killing curves or flow cytometry) methodologies. A peritoneal sepsis murine model was used to evaluate in vivo impact. Suppression of the SOS response was capable of resensitizing mutant strains with genes encoding three or four different resistance mechanisms (up to 15-fold reductions in MICs). Killing curve assays showed a clear disadvantage for survival (Δlog(10) CFU per milliliter [CFU/ml] of 8 log units after 24 h), and the in vivo efficacy of ciprofloxacin was significantly enhanced (Δlog(10) CFU/g of 1.76 log units) in resistant strains with a suppressed SOS response. This effect was evident even after short periods (60 min) of exposure. Suppression of the SOS response reverses antimicrobial resistance across a range of E. coli phenotypes from reduced susceptibility to highly resistant, playing a significant role in increasing the in vivo efficacy. American Society for Microbiology 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5635686/ /pubmed/29018116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17 Text en Copyright © 2017 Recacha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Recacha, E.
Machuca, J.
Díaz de Alba, P.
Ramos-Güelfo, M.
Docobo-Pérez, F.
Rodriguez-Beltrán, J.
Blázquez, J.
Pascual, A.
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M.
Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title_full Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title_fullStr Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title_full_unstemmed Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title_short Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
title_sort quinolone resistance reversion by targeting the sos response
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17
work_keys_str_mv AT recachae quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT machucaj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT diazdealbap quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT ramosguelfom quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT docoboperezf quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT rodriguezbeltranj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT blazquezj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT pascuala quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse
AT rodriguezmartinezjm quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse