Cargando…
Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response
Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17 |
_version_ | 1783270339176824832 |
---|---|
author | Recacha, E. Machuca, J. Díaz de Alba, P. Ramos-Güelfo, M. Docobo-Pérez, F. Rodriguez-Beltrán, J. Blázquez, J. Pascual, A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M. |
author_facet | Recacha, E. Machuca, J. Díaz de Alba, P. Ramos-Güelfo, M. Docobo-Pérez, F. Rodriguez-Beltrán, J. Blázquez, J. Pascual, A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M. |
author_sort | Recacha, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance. E. coli mutants exhibiting a spectrum of SOS activity were constructed from isogenic strains carrying quinolone resistance mechanisms with susceptible and resistant phenotypes. Changes in susceptibility were evaluated by static (MICs) and dynamic (killing curves or flow cytometry) methodologies. A peritoneal sepsis murine model was used to evaluate in vivo impact. Suppression of the SOS response was capable of resensitizing mutant strains with genes encoding three or four different resistance mechanisms (up to 15-fold reductions in MICs). Killing curve assays showed a clear disadvantage for survival (Δlog(10) CFU per milliliter [CFU/ml] of 8 log units after 24 h), and the in vivo efficacy of ciprofloxacin was significantly enhanced (Δlog(10) CFU/g of 1.76 log units) in resistant strains with a suppressed SOS response. This effect was evident even after short periods (60 min) of exposure. Suppression of the SOS response reverses antimicrobial resistance across a range of E. coli phenotypes from reduced susceptibility to highly resistant, playing a significant role in increasing the in vivo efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5635686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56356862017-10-13 Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response Recacha, E. Machuca, J. Díaz de Alba, P. Ramos-Güelfo, M. Docobo-Pérez, F. Rodriguez-Beltrán, J. Blázquez, J. Pascual, A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M. mBio Research Article Suppression of the SOS response has been postulated as a therapeutic strategy for potentiating antimicrobial agents. We aimed to evaluate the impact of its suppression on reversing resistance using a model of isogenic strains of Escherichia coli representing multiple levels of quinolone resistance. E. coli mutants exhibiting a spectrum of SOS activity were constructed from isogenic strains carrying quinolone resistance mechanisms with susceptible and resistant phenotypes. Changes in susceptibility were evaluated by static (MICs) and dynamic (killing curves or flow cytometry) methodologies. A peritoneal sepsis murine model was used to evaluate in vivo impact. Suppression of the SOS response was capable of resensitizing mutant strains with genes encoding three or four different resistance mechanisms (up to 15-fold reductions in MICs). Killing curve assays showed a clear disadvantage for survival (Δlog(10) CFU per milliliter [CFU/ml] of 8 log units after 24 h), and the in vivo efficacy of ciprofloxacin was significantly enhanced (Δlog(10) CFU/g of 1.76 log units) in resistant strains with a suppressed SOS response. This effect was evident even after short periods (60 min) of exposure. Suppression of the SOS response reverses antimicrobial resistance across a range of E. coli phenotypes from reduced susceptibility to highly resistant, playing a significant role in increasing the in vivo efficacy. American Society for Microbiology 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5635686/ /pubmed/29018116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17 Text en Copyright © 2017 Recacha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Recacha, E. Machuca, J. Díaz de Alba, P. Ramos-Güelfo, M. Docobo-Pérez, F. Rodriguez-Beltrán, J. Blázquez, J. Pascual, A. Rodríguez-Martínez, J. M. Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title | Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title_full | Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title_fullStr | Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title_short | Quinolone Resistance Reversion by Targeting the SOS Response |
title_sort | quinolone resistance reversion by targeting the sos response |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00971-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT recachae quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT machucaj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT diazdealbap quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT ramosguelfom quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT docoboperezf quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT rodriguezbeltranj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT blazquezj quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT pascuala quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse AT rodriguezmartinezjm quinoloneresistancereversionbytargetingthesosresponse |