Cargando…

Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator

Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Arong, Rajakumar, Dhanarajan, Yoon, Bong-June, Baker, Bradley J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093633
http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241
_version_ 1783274407615004672
author Jung, Arong
Rajakumar, Dhanarajan
Yoon, Bong-June
Baker, Bradley J.
author_facet Jung, Arong
Rajakumar, Dhanarajan
Yoon, Bong-June
Baker, Bradley J.
author_sort Jung, Arong
collection PubMed
description Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously been shown to affect the voltage range of the optical signal. Introduction of polar amino acids at this position reduced the voltage-dependent optical signal of the GEVI. Negatively charged amino acids slightly reduced the optical signal by 33 percent while positively charge amino acids at this position reduced the optical signal by 80%. Surprisingly, the range of V220D was similar to that of V220K with shifted optical responses towards negative potentials. In contrast, the V220E mutant mirrored the responses of the V220R mutation suggesting that the length of the side chain plays in role in determining the voltage range of the GEVI. Charged mutations at the 219 position all behaved similarly slightly shifting the optical response to more negative potentials. Charged mutations to the 221 position behaved erratically suggesting interactions with the plasma membrane and/or other amino acids in the VSD. Introduction of bulky amino acids at the V220 position increased the range of the optical response to include hyperpolarizing signals. Combining The V220W mutant with the R217Q mutation resulted in a probe that reduced the depolarizing signal and enhanced the hyperpolarizing signal which may lead to GEVIs that only report neuronal inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56610572017-11-01 Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator Jung, Arong Rajakumar, Dhanarajan Yoon, Bong-June Baker, Bradley J. Exp Neurobiol Original Article Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously been shown to affect the voltage range of the optical signal. Introduction of polar amino acids at this position reduced the voltage-dependent optical signal of the GEVI. Negatively charged amino acids slightly reduced the optical signal by 33 percent while positively charge amino acids at this position reduced the optical signal by 80%. Surprisingly, the range of V220D was similar to that of V220K with shifted optical responses towards negative potentials. In contrast, the V220E mutant mirrored the responses of the V220R mutation suggesting that the length of the side chain plays in role in determining the voltage range of the GEVI. Charged mutations at the 219 position all behaved similarly slightly shifting the optical response to more negative potentials. Charged mutations to the 221 position behaved erratically suggesting interactions with the plasma membrane and/or other amino acids in the VSD. Introduction of bulky amino acids at the V220 position increased the range of the optical response to include hyperpolarizing signals. Combining The V220W mutant with the R217Q mutation resulted in a probe that reduced the depolarizing signal and enhanced the hyperpolarizing signal which may lead to GEVIs that only report neuronal inhibition. The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science 2017-10 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5661057/ /pubmed/29093633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241 Text en Copyright © Experimental Neurobiology 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jung, Arong
Rajakumar, Dhanarajan
Yoon, Bong-June
Baker, Bradley J.
Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title_full Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title_fullStr Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title_full_unstemmed Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title_short Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
title_sort modulating the voltage-sensitivity of a genetically encoded voltage indicator
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093633
http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241
work_keys_str_mv AT jungarong modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator
AT rajakumardhanarajan modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator
AT yoonbongjune modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator
AT bakerbradleyj modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator