Cargando…
Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator
Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241 |
_version_ | 1783274407615004672 |
---|---|
author | Jung, Arong Rajakumar, Dhanarajan Yoon, Bong-June Baker, Bradley J. |
author_facet | Jung, Arong Rajakumar, Dhanarajan Yoon, Bong-June Baker, Bradley J. |
author_sort | Jung, Arong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously been shown to affect the voltage range of the optical signal. Introduction of polar amino acids at this position reduced the voltage-dependent optical signal of the GEVI. Negatively charged amino acids slightly reduced the optical signal by 33 percent while positively charge amino acids at this position reduced the optical signal by 80%. Surprisingly, the range of V220D was similar to that of V220K with shifted optical responses towards negative potentials. In contrast, the V220E mutant mirrored the responses of the V220R mutation suggesting that the length of the side chain plays in role in determining the voltage range of the GEVI. Charged mutations at the 219 position all behaved similarly slightly shifting the optical response to more negative potentials. Charged mutations to the 221 position behaved erratically suggesting interactions with the plasma membrane and/or other amino acids in the VSD. Introduction of bulky amino acids at the V220 position increased the range of the optical response to include hyperpolarizing signals. Combining The V220W mutant with the R217Q mutation resulted in a probe that reduced the depolarizing signal and enhanced the hyperpolarizing signal which may lead to GEVIs that only report neuronal inhibition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5661057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56610572017-11-01 Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator Jung, Arong Rajakumar, Dhanarajan Yoon, Bong-June Baker, Bradley J. Exp Neurobiol Original Article Saturation mutagenesis was performed on a single position in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). The VSD consists of four transmembrane helixes designated S1-S4. The V220 position located near the plasma membrane/extracellular interface had previously been shown to affect the voltage range of the optical signal. Introduction of polar amino acids at this position reduced the voltage-dependent optical signal of the GEVI. Negatively charged amino acids slightly reduced the optical signal by 33 percent while positively charge amino acids at this position reduced the optical signal by 80%. Surprisingly, the range of V220D was similar to that of V220K with shifted optical responses towards negative potentials. In contrast, the V220E mutant mirrored the responses of the V220R mutation suggesting that the length of the side chain plays in role in determining the voltage range of the GEVI. Charged mutations at the 219 position all behaved similarly slightly shifting the optical response to more negative potentials. Charged mutations to the 221 position behaved erratically suggesting interactions with the plasma membrane and/or other amino acids in the VSD. Introduction of bulky amino acids at the V220 position increased the range of the optical response to include hyperpolarizing signals. Combining The V220W mutant with the R217Q mutation resulted in a probe that reduced the depolarizing signal and enhanced the hyperpolarizing signal which may lead to GEVIs that only report neuronal inhibition. The Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science 2017-10 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5661057/ /pubmed/29093633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241 Text en Copyright © Experimental Neurobiology 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jung, Arong Rajakumar, Dhanarajan Yoon, Bong-June Baker, Bradley J. Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title | Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title_full | Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title_fullStr | Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title_short | Modulating the Voltage-sensitivity of a Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicator |
title_sort | modulating the voltage-sensitivity of a genetically encoded voltage indicator |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5607/en.2017.26.5.241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungarong modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator AT rajakumardhanarajan modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator AT yoonbongjune modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator AT bakerbradleyj modulatingthevoltagesensitivityofageneticallyencodedvoltageindicator |