Cargando…

Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare in the UK can be traced as far back as the 1970s. More recently, campaigns by harmed patients and their relatives have emerged as a result of clinical failings in the NHS, challenging paternalistic healthcare, which ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ocloo, Josephine, Garfield, Sarah, Dawson, Shoba, Dean Franklin, Bryony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018426
_version_ 1783275122176557056
author Ocloo, Josephine
Garfield, Sarah
Dawson, Shoba
Dean Franklin, Bryony
author_facet Ocloo, Josephine
Garfield, Sarah
Dawson, Shoba
Dean Franklin, Bryony
author_sort Ocloo, Josephine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The emergence of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare in the UK can be traced as far back as the 1970s. More recently, campaigns by harmed patients and their relatives have emerged as a result of clinical failings in the NHS, challenging paternalistic healthcare, which have led to a new focus on PPI in quality and safety, nationally and internationally. Evidence suggests that PPI within patient safety is often atheoretical and located within a biomedical discourse. This review will explore the literature on PPI across patient safety, healthcare and social care to identify theory, barriers and enablers that can be used to develop PPI in patient safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches of three electronic bibliographic databases will be conducted, using both MeSH and free-text terms to identify empirical literature published from database inception to May 2017. The screening process will involve input from at least two researchers and any disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Initial inclusion and exclusion criteria have been developed and will be refined iteratively throughout the process. Data extraction from included articles will be conducted by at least two researchers using a data extraction form. Extracted information will be analysed using a narrative review approach, which synthesises data using a descriptive method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this review as no empirical data were collected. We believe that the findings and recommendations from this review will be particularly relevant for an audience of academics and policymakers. The findings will, therefore, be written up and disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences with a health focus. They will also be disseminated to leading health policy organisations in the NHS, such as NHS England and NHS Improvement and national policy bodies such as the Health Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56652192017-11-15 Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews Ocloo, Josephine Garfield, Sarah Dawson, Shoba Dean Franklin, Bryony BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: The emergence of patient and public involvement (PPI) in healthcare in the UK can be traced as far back as the 1970s. More recently, campaigns by harmed patients and their relatives have emerged as a result of clinical failings in the NHS, challenging paternalistic healthcare, which have led to a new focus on PPI in quality and safety, nationally and internationally. Evidence suggests that PPI within patient safety is often atheoretical and located within a biomedical discourse. This review will explore the literature on PPI across patient safety, healthcare and social care to identify theory, barriers and enablers that can be used to develop PPI in patient safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches of three electronic bibliographic databases will be conducted, using both MeSH and free-text terms to identify empirical literature published from database inception to May 2017. The screening process will involve input from at least two researchers and any disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Initial inclusion and exclusion criteria have been developed and will be refined iteratively throughout the process. Data extraction from included articles will be conducted by at least two researchers using a data extraction form. Extracted information will be analysed using a narrative review approach, which synthesises data using a descriptive method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this review as no empirical data were collected. We believe that the findings and recommendations from this review will be particularly relevant for an audience of academics and policymakers. The findings will, therefore, be written up and disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences with a health focus. They will also be disseminated to leading health policy organisations in the NHS, such as NHS England and NHS Improvement and national policy bodies such as the Health Foundation. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5665219/ /pubmed/29070642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018426 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Ocloo, Josephine
Garfield, Sarah
Dawson, Shoba
Dean Franklin, Bryony
Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title_full Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title_short Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
title_sort exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a protocol for a systematic review of reviews
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018426
work_keys_str_mv AT ocloojosephine exploringthetheorybarriersandenablersforpatientandpublicinvolvementacrosshealthsocialcareandpatientsafetyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofreviews
AT garfieldsarah exploringthetheorybarriersandenablersforpatientandpublicinvolvementacrosshealthsocialcareandpatientsafetyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofreviews
AT dawsonshoba exploringthetheorybarriersandenablersforpatientandpublicinvolvementacrosshealthsocialcareandpatientsafetyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofreviews
AT deanfranklinbryony exploringthetheorybarriersandenablersforpatientandpublicinvolvementacrosshealthsocialcareandpatientsafetyaprotocolforasystematicreviewofreviews