Cargando…

Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The associations between red and processed meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer types have not been conclusively defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze these associations. We searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published from inception through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zhanwei, Feng, Quanxin, Yin, Zifang, Shuang, Jianbo, Bai, Bin, Yu, Pengfei, Guo, Min, Zhao, Qingchuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137344
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20667
_version_ 1783275942073860096
author Zhao, Zhanwei
Feng, Quanxin
Yin, Zifang
Shuang, Jianbo
Bai, Bin
Yu, Pengfei
Guo, Min
Zhao, Qingchuan
author_facet Zhao, Zhanwei
Feng, Quanxin
Yin, Zifang
Shuang, Jianbo
Bai, Bin
Yu, Pengfei
Guo, Min
Zhao, Qingchuan
author_sort Zhao, Zhanwei
collection PubMed
description The associations between red and processed meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer types have not been conclusively defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze these associations. We searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published from inception through September 2016. Dose-response, subgroup and subtype analyses of colorectal cancer (colon cancer, proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer and rectal cancer) were performed. We ultimately selected 60 eligible studies. Positive associations were observed for colorectal cancer in case-control studies (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P<0.01) and cohort studies (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P<0.01). However, subtype analyses yielded null results for distal colon cancer in case-control studies (P=0.41) and cohort studies (P=0.18) for red meat and null results for proximal colon cancer in case-control studies (P=0.13) and cohort studies (P=0.39) for processed meat. Additionally, although the results of case-control studies were positive (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P=0.04) for rectal cancer, there were no positive associations between red (P=0.34) and processed meat (P=0.06) consumption and the risk in cohort studies. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found consumption of red and processed meat was associated with the risk of overall colorectal cancer but not rectal cancer. Additionally, there were no associations between the consumption of red meat and distal colon cancer risk and between the consumption of processed meat and proximal colon cancer risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5669970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56699702017-11-09 Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhao, Zhanwei Feng, Quanxin Yin, Zifang Shuang, Jianbo Bai, Bin Yu, Pengfei Guo, Min Zhao, Qingchuan Oncotarget Meta-Analysis The associations between red and processed meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer types have not been conclusively defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze these associations. We searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published from inception through September 2016. Dose-response, subgroup and subtype analyses of colorectal cancer (colon cancer, proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer and rectal cancer) were performed. We ultimately selected 60 eligible studies. Positive associations were observed for colorectal cancer in case-control studies (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P<0.01) and cohort studies (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P<0.01). However, subtype analyses yielded null results for distal colon cancer in case-control studies (P=0.41) and cohort studies (P=0.18) for red meat and null results for proximal colon cancer in case-control studies (P=0.13) and cohort studies (P=0.39) for processed meat. Additionally, although the results of case-control studies were positive (red meat, P<0.01; processed meat, P=0.04) for rectal cancer, there were no positive associations between red (P=0.34) and processed meat (P=0.06) consumption and the risk in cohort studies. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found consumption of red and processed meat was associated with the risk of overall colorectal cancer but not rectal cancer. Additionally, there were no associations between the consumption of red meat and distal colon cancer risk and between the consumption of processed meat and proximal colon cancer risk. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5669970/ /pubmed/29137344 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20667 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Zhao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Zhao, Zhanwei
Feng, Quanxin
Yin, Zifang
Shuang, Jianbo
Bai, Bin
Yu, Pengfei
Guo, Min
Zhao, Qingchuan
Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5669970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137344
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20667
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozhanwei redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengquanxin redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinzifang redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shuangjianbo redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baibin redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yupengfei redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guomin redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoqingchuan redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandcolorectalcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis