Cargando…

A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy

BACKGROUND: Assessment of left main stem (LMS) stenosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Data on assessment of LMS disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are limited. CE-MARC is the largest prospective comparison of CMR a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, James R. J., Kidambi, Ananth, Biglands, John D., Maredia, Neil, Dickinson, Catherine J., Plein, Sven, Greenwood, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0398-7
_version_ 1783276826189103104
author Foley, James R. J.
Kidambi, Ananth
Biglands, John D.
Maredia, Neil
Dickinson, Catherine J.
Plein, Sven
Greenwood, John P.
author_facet Foley, James R. J.
Kidambi, Ananth
Biglands, John D.
Maredia, Neil
Dickinson, Catherine J.
Plein, Sven
Greenwood, John P.
author_sort Foley, James R. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of left main stem (LMS) stenosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Data on assessment of LMS disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are limited. CE-MARC is the largest prospective comparison of CMR and SPECT against quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA) for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), and provided the framework for this evaluation. The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic accuracy of visual and quantitative perfusion CMR to SPECT in patients with LMS stable CAD. METHODS: Fifty-four patients from the CE-MARC study were included: 27 (4%) with significant LMS or LMS-equivalent disease on QCA, and 27 age/sex-matched patients with no flow-limiting CAD. All patients underwent multi-parametric CMR, SPECT and QCA. Performance of visual and quantitative perfusion CMR by Fermi-constrained deconvolution to detect LMS disease was compared with SPECT. RESULTS: Of 27 patients in the LMS group, 22 (81%) had abnormal CMR and 16 (59%) had abnormal SPECT. All patients with abnormal CMR had abnormal perfusion by visual analysis. CMR demonstrated significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) for detection of disease (0.95; 0.85–0.99) over SPECT (0.63; 0.49–0.76) (p = 0.0001). Global mean stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) by CMR in LMS patients was significantly lower than controls (1.77 ± 0.72 ml/g/min vs. 3.28 ± 1.20 ml/g/min, p < 0.001). MBF of <2.08 ml/g/min had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 85% for diagnosis of LMS disease, with an AUC (0.87; 0.75–0.94) not significantly different to visual CMR analysis (p = 0.18), and more accurate than SPECT (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Visual stress perfusion CMR had higher diagnostic accuracy than SPECT to detect LMS disease. Quantitative perfusion CMR had similar performance to visual CMR perfusion analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5674685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56746852017-11-15 A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy Foley, James R. J. Kidambi, Ananth Biglands, John D. Maredia, Neil Dickinson, Catherine J. Plein, Sven Greenwood, John P. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Assessment of left main stem (LMS) stenosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Data on assessment of LMS disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are limited. CE-MARC is the largest prospective comparison of CMR and SPECT against quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA) for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), and provided the framework for this evaluation. The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic accuracy of visual and quantitative perfusion CMR to SPECT in patients with LMS stable CAD. METHODS: Fifty-four patients from the CE-MARC study were included: 27 (4%) with significant LMS or LMS-equivalent disease on QCA, and 27 age/sex-matched patients with no flow-limiting CAD. All patients underwent multi-parametric CMR, SPECT and QCA. Performance of visual and quantitative perfusion CMR by Fermi-constrained deconvolution to detect LMS disease was compared with SPECT. RESULTS: Of 27 patients in the LMS group, 22 (81%) had abnormal CMR and 16 (59%) had abnormal SPECT. All patients with abnormal CMR had abnormal perfusion by visual analysis. CMR demonstrated significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) for detection of disease (0.95; 0.85–0.99) over SPECT (0.63; 0.49–0.76) (p = 0.0001). Global mean stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) by CMR in LMS patients was significantly lower than controls (1.77 ± 0.72 ml/g/min vs. 3.28 ± 1.20 ml/g/min, p < 0.001). MBF of <2.08 ml/g/min had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 85% for diagnosis of LMS disease, with an AUC (0.87; 0.75–0.94) not significantly different to visual CMR analysis (p = 0.18), and more accurate than SPECT (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Visual stress perfusion CMR had higher diagnostic accuracy than SPECT to detect LMS disease. Quantitative perfusion CMR had similar performance to visual CMR perfusion analysis. BioMed Central 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5674685/ /pubmed/29110669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0398-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Foley, James R. J.
Kidambi, Ananth
Biglands, John D.
Maredia, Neil
Dickinson, Catherine J.
Plein, Sven
Greenwood, John P.
A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title_full A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title_fullStr A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title_short A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy
title_sort comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (spect) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a ce-marc substudy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5674685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0398-7
work_keys_str_mv AT foleyjamesrj acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT kidambiananth acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT biglandsjohnd acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT maredianeil acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT dickinsoncatherinej acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT pleinsven acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT greenwoodjohnp acomparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT foleyjamesrj comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT kidambiananth comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT biglandsjohnd comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT maredianeil comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT dickinsoncatherinej comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT pleinsven comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy
AT greenwoodjohnp comparisonofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectperfusionimaginginleftmainstemorequivalentcoronaryarterydiseaseacemarcsubstudy