Cargando…

Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how a deviation from the horizontal plane, affects the image quality in two different CBCT-devices. METHODS: A phantom head SK150 (RANDO, The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY, USA) was examined in two CBCT-units: Accuitomo 80 and Veraviewepocs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindfors, Ninita, Lund, Henrik, Johansson, Hans, Ekestubbe, Annika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29159206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.10.001
_version_ 1783276981617426432
author Lindfors, Ninita
Lund, Henrik
Johansson, Hans
Ekestubbe, Annika
author_facet Lindfors, Ninita
Lund, Henrik
Johansson, Hans
Ekestubbe, Annika
author_sort Lindfors, Ninita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how a deviation from the horizontal plane, affects the image quality in two different CBCT-devices. METHODS: A phantom head SK150 (RANDO, The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY, USA) was examined in two CBCT-units: Accuitomo 80 and Veraviewepocs 3D R100 (J. Morita Mfg. Corp. Kyoto, Japan). The phantom head was placed with the hard palate parallel to the horizontal plane and tilted 20 ° backwards. Exposures were performed with different field of views (FOVs), voxel sizes, slice thicknesses and exposure settings. Effective dose was calculated using PCXMC 2.0 (STUK, Helsinki, Finland). Image quality was assessed using contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Region of interest (ROI) was set at three different levels of the mandibular bone and soft tissue, uni- and bilaterally in small and large FOVs, respectively. CNR values were calculated by CT-value and standard deviation for each ROI. Factor analysis was used to analyze the material. RESULTS: Tilting the phantom head backwards rendered significantly higher mean CNR values regardless of FOV. The effective dose was lower in small than in large FOVs and varied to a larger extent between CBCT-devices in large FOVs. CONCLUSIONS: Head position can affect the image quality. Tilting the head backward improved image quality in the mandibular region. However, if influenced by other variables e.g. motion artifacts in a clinical situation, remains to be further investigated. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Image quality assessed using CNR values to investigate the influence of different patient positions and FOVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5675893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56758932017-11-20 Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices Lindfors, Ninita Lund, Henrik Johansson, Hans Ekestubbe, Annika Eur J Radiol Open Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate how a deviation from the horizontal plane, affects the image quality in two different CBCT-devices. METHODS: A phantom head SK150 (RANDO, The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY, USA) was examined in two CBCT-units: Accuitomo 80 and Veraviewepocs 3D R100 (J. Morita Mfg. Corp. Kyoto, Japan). The phantom head was placed with the hard palate parallel to the horizontal plane and tilted 20 ° backwards. Exposures were performed with different field of views (FOVs), voxel sizes, slice thicknesses and exposure settings. Effective dose was calculated using PCXMC 2.0 (STUK, Helsinki, Finland). Image quality was assessed using contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Region of interest (ROI) was set at three different levels of the mandibular bone and soft tissue, uni- and bilaterally in small and large FOVs, respectively. CNR values were calculated by CT-value and standard deviation for each ROI. Factor analysis was used to analyze the material. RESULTS: Tilting the phantom head backwards rendered significantly higher mean CNR values regardless of FOV. The effective dose was lower in small than in large FOVs and varied to a larger extent between CBCT-devices in large FOVs. CONCLUSIONS: Head position can affect the image quality. Tilting the head backward improved image quality in the mandibular region. However, if influenced by other variables e.g. motion artifacts in a clinical situation, remains to be further investigated. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Image quality assessed using CNR values to investigate the influence of different patient positions and FOVs. Elsevier 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5675893/ /pubmed/29159206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.10.001 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lindfors, Ninita
Lund, Henrik
Johansson, Hans
Ekestubbe, Annika
Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title_full Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title_fullStr Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title_full_unstemmed Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title_short Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices
title_sort influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (cbct) devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29159206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT lindforsninita influenceofpatientpositionandotherinherentfactorsonimagequalityintwodifferentconebeamcomputedtomographycbctdevices
AT lundhenrik influenceofpatientpositionandotherinherentfactorsonimagequalityintwodifferentconebeamcomputedtomographycbctdevices
AT johanssonhans influenceofpatientpositionandotherinherentfactorsonimagequalityintwodifferentconebeamcomputedtomographycbctdevices
AT ekestubbeannika influenceofpatientpositionandotherinherentfactorsonimagequalityintwodifferentconebeamcomputedtomographycbctdevices