Cargando…

Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?

BACKGROUND: Several reports have confirmed that macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolates of Dirofilaria immitis are circulating in the United States; however, the prevalence and potential impact of drug resistance is unknown. We wished to assess computer-aided measurements of motility as a method for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maclean, Mary J., Savadelis, Molly D., Coates, Ruby, Dzimianski, Michael T., Jones, Corey, Benbow, Cynthia, Storey, Bobby E., Kaplan, Ray M., Moorhead, Andrew R., Wolstenholme, Adrian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29143656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2436-6
_version_ 1783279168075595776
author Maclean, Mary J.
Savadelis, Molly D.
Coates, Ruby
Dzimianski, Michael T.
Jones, Corey
Benbow, Cynthia
Storey, Bobby E.
Kaplan, Ray M.
Moorhead, Andrew R.
Wolstenholme, Adrian J.
author_facet Maclean, Mary J.
Savadelis, Molly D.
Coates, Ruby
Dzimianski, Michael T.
Jones, Corey
Benbow, Cynthia
Storey, Bobby E.
Kaplan, Ray M.
Moorhead, Andrew R.
Wolstenholme, Adrian J.
author_sort Maclean, Mary J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several reports have confirmed that macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolates of Dirofilaria immitis are circulating in the United States; however, the prevalence and potential impact of drug resistance is unknown. We wished to assess computer-aided measurements of motility as a method for rapidly assessing the resistance status of parasite isolates. METHODS: Blood containing microfilariae (MF) from two clinical cases with a high suspicion of resistance was fed to mosquitoes and the resultant L3 injected into dogs that were then treated with six doses of Heartgard® Plus (ivermectin + pyrantel; Merial Limited) at 30-day intervals. In both cases patent heartworm infections resulted despite the preventive treatment. Microfilariae isolated from these dogs and other isolates of known resistance status were exposed to varying concentrations of ivermectin in vitro and their motility assessed 24 h later using computer-processed high-definition video imaging. RESULTS: We produced two isolates, Yazoo-2013 and Metairie-2014, which established patent infections despite Heartgard® Plus treatments. Measurements of the motility of MF of these and other isolates (Missouri, MP3 and JYD-27) following exposure to varying concentrations of ivermectin did not distinguish between susceptible and resistant heartworm populations. There was some evidence that the method of MF isolation had an influence on the motility and drug susceptibility of the MF. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that drug-resistant heartworms are circulating in the southern United States, but that motility measurements in the presence of ivermectin are not a reliable method for their detection. This implies that the drug does not kill the microfilariae via paralysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56884522017-11-22 Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones? Maclean, Mary J. Savadelis, Molly D. Coates, Ruby Dzimianski, Michael T. Jones, Corey Benbow, Cynthia Storey, Bobby E. Kaplan, Ray M. Moorhead, Andrew R. Wolstenholme, Adrian J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Several reports have confirmed that macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolates of Dirofilaria immitis are circulating in the United States; however, the prevalence and potential impact of drug resistance is unknown. We wished to assess computer-aided measurements of motility as a method for rapidly assessing the resistance status of parasite isolates. METHODS: Blood containing microfilariae (MF) from two clinical cases with a high suspicion of resistance was fed to mosquitoes and the resultant L3 injected into dogs that were then treated with six doses of Heartgard® Plus (ivermectin + pyrantel; Merial Limited) at 30-day intervals. In both cases patent heartworm infections resulted despite the preventive treatment. Microfilariae isolated from these dogs and other isolates of known resistance status were exposed to varying concentrations of ivermectin in vitro and their motility assessed 24 h later using computer-processed high-definition video imaging. RESULTS: We produced two isolates, Yazoo-2013 and Metairie-2014, which established patent infections despite Heartgard® Plus treatments. Measurements of the motility of MF of these and other isolates (Missouri, MP3 and JYD-27) following exposure to varying concentrations of ivermectin did not distinguish between susceptible and resistant heartworm populations. There was some evidence that the method of MF isolation had an influence on the motility and drug susceptibility of the MF. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that drug-resistant heartworms are circulating in the southern United States, but that motility measurements in the presence of ivermectin are not a reliable method for their detection. This implies that the drug does not kill the microfilariae via paralysis. BioMed Central 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5688452/ /pubmed/29143656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2436-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Maclean, Mary J.
Savadelis, Molly D.
Coates, Ruby
Dzimianski, Michael T.
Jones, Corey
Benbow, Cynthia
Storey, Bobby E.
Kaplan, Ray M.
Moorhead, Andrew R.
Wolstenholme, Adrian J.
Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title_full Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title_fullStr Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title_full_unstemmed Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title_short Does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of Dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
title_sort does evaluation of in vitro microfilarial motility reflect the resistance status of dirofilaria immitis isolates to macrocyclic lactones?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29143656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2436-6
work_keys_str_mv AT macleanmaryj doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT savadelismollyd doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT coatesruby doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT dzimianskimichaelt doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT jonescorey doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT benbowcynthia doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT storeybobbye doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT kaplanraym doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT moorheadandrewr doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones
AT wolstenholmeadrianj doesevaluationofinvitromicrofilarialmotilityreflecttheresistancestatusofdirofilariaimmitisisolatestomacrocycliclactones