Cargando…

Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans

BACKGROUND: The mouse is one of the most widely used animal models to study neuromuscular diseases and test new therapeutic strategies. However, findings from successful pre-clinical studies using mouse models frequently fail to translate to humans due to various factors. Differences in muscle funct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xiao, Charles, James P., Akay, Turgay, Hutchinson, John R., Blemker, Silvia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-017-0143-9
_version_ 1783279326528012288
author Hu, Xiao
Charles, James P.
Akay, Turgay
Hutchinson, John R.
Blemker, Silvia S.
author_facet Hu, Xiao
Charles, James P.
Akay, Turgay
Hutchinson, John R.
Blemker, Silvia S.
author_sort Hu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mouse is one of the most widely used animal models to study neuromuscular diseases and test new therapeutic strategies. However, findings from successful pre-clinical studies using mouse models frequently fail to translate to humans due to various factors. Differences in muscle function between the two species could be crucial but often have been overlooked. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans. METHODS: Recently published musculoskeletal models of the mouse hindlimb and human lower limb were used to simulate muscle-tendon dynamics during mouse and human walking, a key daily activity. Muscle fiber length changes (fiber excursions) of 25 muscle homologs in the two species were calculated from these simulations and then compared. To understand potential causes of differences in fiber excursions in walking, joint excursions and muscle moment arms were also compared across one gait cycle. RESULTS: Most muscles (19 out of 25 muscles) of the mouse hindlimb had much smaller fiber excursions as compared to human lower limb muscles during walking. For these muscles, fiber excursions in mice were only 48 ± 19% of those in humans. The differences in fiber excursion between the two species were primarily due to the reduced joint excursions and smaller muscle moment arms in mice as compared to humans. CONCLUSIONS: Since progressive neuromuscular diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, are known to be accelerated by damage accumulated from active muscle lengthening, these results suggest that biomechanical differences in muscle function during walking between mice and humans may impede the translations of knowledge gained from mouse models to humans. This knowledge would add a fresh perspective on how pre-clinical studies on mice might be better designed to improve translation to human clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13395-017-0143-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56891802017-11-24 Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans Hu, Xiao Charles, James P. Akay, Turgay Hutchinson, John R. Blemker, Silvia S. Skelet Muscle Research BACKGROUND: The mouse is one of the most widely used animal models to study neuromuscular diseases and test new therapeutic strategies. However, findings from successful pre-clinical studies using mouse models frequently fail to translate to humans due to various factors. Differences in muscle function between the two species could be crucial but often have been overlooked. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans. METHODS: Recently published musculoskeletal models of the mouse hindlimb and human lower limb were used to simulate muscle-tendon dynamics during mouse and human walking, a key daily activity. Muscle fiber length changes (fiber excursions) of 25 muscle homologs in the two species were calculated from these simulations and then compared. To understand potential causes of differences in fiber excursions in walking, joint excursions and muscle moment arms were also compared across one gait cycle. RESULTS: Most muscles (19 out of 25 muscles) of the mouse hindlimb had much smaller fiber excursions as compared to human lower limb muscles during walking. For these muscles, fiber excursions in mice were only 48 ± 19% of those in humans. The differences in fiber excursion between the two species were primarily due to the reduced joint excursions and smaller muscle moment arms in mice as compared to humans. CONCLUSIONS: Since progressive neuromuscular diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, are known to be accelerated by damage accumulated from active muscle lengthening, these results suggest that biomechanical differences in muscle function during walking between mice and humans may impede the translations of knowledge gained from mouse models to humans. This knowledge would add a fresh perspective on how pre-clinical studies on mice might be better designed to improve translation to human clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13395-017-0143-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5689180/ /pubmed/29145886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-017-0143-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Xiao
Charles, James P.
Akay, Turgay
Hutchinson, John R.
Blemker, Silvia S.
Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title_full Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title_fullStr Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title_full_unstemmed Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title_short Are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? Comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
title_sort are mice good models for human neuromuscular disease? comparing muscle excursions in walking between mice and humans
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13395-017-0143-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huxiao aremicegoodmodelsforhumanneuromusculardiseasecomparingmuscleexcursionsinwalkingbetweenmiceandhumans
AT charlesjamesp aremicegoodmodelsforhumanneuromusculardiseasecomparingmuscleexcursionsinwalkingbetweenmiceandhumans
AT akayturgay aremicegoodmodelsforhumanneuromusculardiseasecomparingmuscleexcursionsinwalkingbetweenmiceandhumans
AT hutchinsonjohnr aremicegoodmodelsforhumanneuromusculardiseasecomparingmuscleexcursionsinwalkingbetweenmiceandhumans
AT blemkersilvias aremicegoodmodelsforhumanneuromusculardiseasecomparingmuscleexcursionsinwalkingbetweenmiceandhumans