Cargando…

Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR

Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kloten, Vera, Rüchel, Nadine, Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz, Gasthaus, Janina, Freudenmacher, Nils, Steib, Florian, Mijnes, Jolein, Eschenbruch, Julian, Binnebösel, Marcel, Knüchel, Ruth, Dahl, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156792
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134
_version_ 1783279434338402304
author Kloten, Vera
Rüchel, Nadine
Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz
Gasthaus, Janina
Freudenmacher, Nils
Steib, Florian
Mijnes, Jolein
Eschenbruch, Julian
Binnebösel, Marcel
Knüchel, Ruth
Dahl, Edgar
author_facet Kloten, Vera
Rüchel, Nadine
Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz
Gasthaus, Janina
Freudenmacher, Nils
Steib, Florian
Mijnes, Jolein
Eschenbruch, Julian
Binnebösel, Marcel
Knüchel, Ruth
Dahl, Edgar
author_sort Kloten, Vera
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=50) from various stages and healthy controls (n=8) by Intplex allele-specific and digital droplet PCR. In addition, the impact of two prominent extraction techniques (silica-based membrane vs. magnetic beads) on cfDNA and ctDNA recovery was analyzed in 38 paired samples from CRC patients and specific spike-in DNA controls. CfDNA fragment size was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Relative quantities of total cfDNA quantities were measured using the Qubit fluorometer. Statistical analysis on total cfDNA yield revealed a strong correlation (r=0.976) between Qubit and absolute Intplex allele-specific PCR measurements in cancer patients and healthy controls. Total cfDNA was significantly increased in cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with the highest yield in distant metastatic disease. In line, the highest amount of ctDNA (1.35 ng/μL) was found in patients with distant organ metastasis. Of great interest, the silica-based membrane method significantly promoted extraction of long cfDNA fragments. In contrast, the magnetic bead system more efficiently recovered short cfDNA fragments in serum of cancer patients. Further, a decreased KRAS allele frequency was observed in serum compared to plasma. This study suggests that the source of cfDNA and choice of pre-analytical extraction systems needs to be more carefully validated in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56896822017-11-17 Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR Kloten, Vera Rüchel, Nadine Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz Gasthaus, Janina Freudenmacher, Nils Steib, Florian Mijnes, Jolein Eschenbruch, Julian Binnebösel, Marcel Knüchel, Ruth Dahl, Edgar Oncotarget Research Paper Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=50) from various stages and healthy controls (n=8) by Intplex allele-specific and digital droplet PCR. In addition, the impact of two prominent extraction techniques (silica-based membrane vs. magnetic beads) on cfDNA and ctDNA recovery was analyzed in 38 paired samples from CRC patients and specific spike-in DNA controls. CfDNA fragment size was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Relative quantities of total cfDNA quantities were measured using the Qubit fluorometer. Statistical analysis on total cfDNA yield revealed a strong correlation (r=0.976) between Qubit and absolute Intplex allele-specific PCR measurements in cancer patients and healthy controls. Total cfDNA was significantly increased in cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with the highest yield in distant metastatic disease. In line, the highest amount of ctDNA (1.35 ng/μL) was found in patients with distant organ metastasis. Of great interest, the silica-based membrane method significantly promoted extraction of long cfDNA fragments. In contrast, the magnetic bead system more efficiently recovered short cfDNA fragments in serum of cancer patients. Further, a decreased KRAS allele frequency was observed in serum compared to plasma. This study suggests that the source of cfDNA and choice of pre-analytical extraction systems needs to be more carefully validated in routine clinical practice. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5689682/ /pubmed/29156792 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kloten et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kloten, Vera
Rüchel, Nadine
Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz
Gasthaus, Janina
Freudenmacher, Nils
Steib, Florian
Mijnes, Jolein
Eschenbruch, Julian
Binnebösel, Marcel
Knüchel, Ruth
Dahl, Edgar
Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title_full Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title_fullStr Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title_full_unstemmed Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title_short Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
title_sort liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating dna extraction systems following absolute quantification of kras mutations using intplex allele-specific pcr
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156792
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134
work_keys_str_mv AT klotenvera liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT ruchelnadine liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT bruchlenadinaortiz liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT gasthausjanina liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT freudenmachernils liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT steibflorian liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT mijnesjolein liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT eschenbruchjulian liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT binneboselmarcel liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT knuchelruth liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr
AT dahledgar liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr