Cargando…
Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR
Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156792 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134 |
_version_ | 1783279434338402304 |
---|---|
author | Kloten, Vera Rüchel, Nadine Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz Gasthaus, Janina Freudenmacher, Nils Steib, Florian Mijnes, Jolein Eschenbruch, Julian Binnebösel, Marcel Knüchel, Ruth Dahl, Edgar |
author_facet | Kloten, Vera Rüchel, Nadine Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz Gasthaus, Janina Freudenmacher, Nils Steib, Florian Mijnes, Jolein Eschenbruch, Julian Binnebösel, Marcel Knüchel, Ruth Dahl, Edgar |
author_sort | Kloten, Vera |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=50) from various stages and healthy controls (n=8) by Intplex allele-specific and digital droplet PCR. In addition, the impact of two prominent extraction techniques (silica-based membrane vs. magnetic beads) on cfDNA and ctDNA recovery was analyzed in 38 paired samples from CRC patients and specific spike-in DNA controls. CfDNA fragment size was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Relative quantities of total cfDNA quantities were measured using the Qubit fluorometer. Statistical analysis on total cfDNA yield revealed a strong correlation (r=0.976) between Qubit and absolute Intplex allele-specific PCR measurements in cancer patients and healthy controls. Total cfDNA was significantly increased in cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with the highest yield in distant metastatic disease. In line, the highest amount of ctDNA (1.35 ng/μL) was found in patients with distant organ metastasis. Of great interest, the silica-based membrane method significantly promoted extraction of long cfDNA fragments. In contrast, the magnetic bead system more efficiently recovered short cfDNA fragments in serum of cancer patients. Further, a decreased KRAS allele frequency was observed in serum compared to plasma. This study suggests that the source of cfDNA and choice of pre-analytical extraction systems needs to be more carefully validated in routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56896822017-11-17 Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR Kloten, Vera Rüchel, Nadine Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz Gasthaus, Janina Freudenmacher, Nils Steib, Florian Mijnes, Jolein Eschenbruch, Julian Binnebösel, Marcel Knüchel, Ruth Dahl, Edgar Oncotarget Research Paper Non-invasive molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising application in personalized cancer management, although there is still much to learn about the biological characteristics of ctDNA. The present study compared absolute amounts of KRAS mutated ctDNA and total circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=50) from various stages and healthy controls (n=8) by Intplex allele-specific and digital droplet PCR. In addition, the impact of two prominent extraction techniques (silica-based membrane vs. magnetic beads) on cfDNA and ctDNA recovery was analyzed in 38 paired samples from CRC patients and specific spike-in DNA controls. CfDNA fragment size was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Relative quantities of total cfDNA quantities were measured using the Qubit fluorometer. Statistical analysis on total cfDNA yield revealed a strong correlation (r=0.976) between Qubit and absolute Intplex allele-specific PCR measurements in cancer patients and healthy controls. Total cfDNA was significantly increased in cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with the highest yield in distant metastatic disease. In line, the highest amount of ctDNA (1.35 ng/μL) was found in patients with distant organ metastasis. Of great interest, the silica-based membrane method significantly promoted extraction of long cfDNA fragments. In contrast, the magnetic bead system more efficiently recovered short cfDNA fragments in serum of cancer patients. Further, a decreased KRAS allele frequency was observed in serum compared to plasma. This study suggests that the source of cfDNA and choice of pre-analytical extraction systems needs to be more carefully validated in routine clinical practice. Impact Journals LLC 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5689682/ /pubmed/29156792 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kloten et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kloten, Vera Rüchel, Nadine Brüchle, Nadina Ortiz Gasthaus, Janina Freudenmacher, Nils Steib, Florian Mijnes, Jolein Eschenbruch, Julian Binnebösel, Marcel Knüchel, Ruth Dahl, Edgar Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title | Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title_full | Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title_fullStr | Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title_short | Liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating DNA extraction systems following absolute quantification of KRAS mutations using Intplex allele-specific PCR |
title_sort | liquid biopsy in colon cancer: comparison of different circulating dna extraction systems following absolute quantification of kras mutations using intplex allele-specific pcr |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156792 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klotenvera liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT ruchelnadine liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT bruchlenadinaortiz liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT gasthausjanina liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT freudenmachernils liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT steibflorian liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT mijnesjolein liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT eschenbruchjulian liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT binneboselmarcel liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT knuchelruth liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr AT dahledgar liquidbiopsyincoloncancercomparisonofdifferentcirculatingdnaextractionsystemsfollowingabsolutequantificationofkrasmutationsusingintplexallelespecificpcr |