Cargando…

Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies

The consequences of selection at linked sites are multiple and widespread across the genomes of most species. Here, I first review the main concepts behind models of selection and linkage in recombining genomes, present the difficulty in parametrizing these models simply as a reduction in effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Comeron, Josep M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0471
_version_ 1783280797355081728
author Comeron, Josep M.
author_facet Comeron, Josep M.
author_sort Comeron, Josep M.
collection PubMed
description The consequences of selection at linked sites are multiple and widespread across the genomes of most species. Here, I first review the main concepts behind models of selection and linkage in recombining genomes, present the difficulty in parametrizing these models simply as a reduction in effective population size (N(e)) and discuss the predicted impact of recombination rates on levels of diversity across genomes. Arguments are then put forward in favour of using a model of selection and linkage with neutral and deleterious mutations (i.e. the background selection model, BGS) as a sensible null hypothesis for investigating the presence of other forms of selection, such as balancing or positive. I also describe and compare two studies that have generated high-resolution landscapes of the predicted consequences of selection at linked sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Both studies show that BGS can explain a very large fraction of the observed variation in diversity across the whole genome, thus supporting its use as null model. Finally, I identify and discuss a number of caveats and challenges in studies of genetic hitchhiking that have been often overlooked, with several of them sharing a potential bias towards overestimating the evidence supporting recent selective sweeps to the detriment of a BGS explanation. One potential source of bias is the analysis of non-equilibrium populations: it is precisely because models of selection and linkage predict variation in N(e) across chromosomes that demographic dynamics are not expected to be equivalent chromosome- or genome-wide. Other challenges include the use of incomplete genome annotations, the assumption of temporally stable recombination landscapes, the presence of genes under balancing selection and the consequences of ignoring non-crossover (gene conversion) recombination events. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56986292017-11-29 Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies Comeron, Josep M. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles The consequences of selection at linked sites are multiple and widespread across the genomes of most species. Here, I first review the main concepts behind models of selection and linkage in recombining genomes, present the difficulty in parametrizing these models simply as a reduction in effective population size (N(e)) and discuss the predicted impact of recombination rates on levels of diversity across genomes. Arguments are then put forward in favour of using a model of selection and linkage with neutral and deleterious mutations (i.e. the background selection model, BGS) as a sensible null hypothesis for investigating the presence of other forms of selection, such as balancing or positive. I also describe and compare two studies that have generated high-resolution landscapes of the predicted consequences of selection at linked sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Both studies show that BGS can explain a very large fraction of the observed variation in diversity across the whole genome, thus supporting its use as null model. Finally, I identify and discuss a number of caveats and challenges in studies of genetic hitchhiking that have been often overlooked, with several of them sharing a potential bias towards overestimating the evidence supporting recent selective sweeps to the detriment of a BGS explanation. One potential source of bias is the analysis of non-equilibrium populations: it is precisely because models of selection and linkage predict variation in N(e) across chromosomes that demographic dynamics are not expected to be equivalent chromosome- or genome-wide. Other challenges include the use of incomplete genome annotations, the assumption of temporally stable recombination landscapes, the presence of genes under balancing selection and the consequences of ignoring non-crossover (gene conversion) recombination events. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms’. The Royal Society 2017-12-19 2017-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5698629/ /pubmed/29109230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0471 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Comeron, Josep M.
Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title_full Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title_fullStr Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title_full_unstemmed Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title_short Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies
title_sort background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from drosophila studies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0471
work_keys_str_mv AT comeronjosepm backgroundselectionasnullhypothesisinpopulationgenomicsinsightsandchallengesfromdrosophilastudies