Cargando…

Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most abundant expression host for recombinant proteins. The production efficiency is dependent on a multitude of parameters. Therefore, high-throughput applications have become an increasingly frequent technique to investigate the main factors. Within th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mühlmann, Martina, Forsten, Eva, Noack, Saskia, Büchs, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0832-4
_version_ 1783282213767348224
author Mühlmann, Martina
Forsten, Eva
Noack, Saskia
Büchs, Jochen
author_facet Mühlmann, Martina
Forsten, Eva
Noack, Saskia
Büchs, Jochen
author_sort Mühlmann, Martina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most abundant expression host for recombinant proteins. The production efficiency is dependent on a multitude of parameters. Therefore, high-throughput applications have become an increasingly frequent technique to investigate the main factors. Within this study, the effects of temperature, induction time and inducer concentration on the metabolic state and the product formation were extensively examined. Induction profiling of E. coli Tuner(DE3) pRhotHi-2-EcFbFP was performed in 48-well Flowerplates and standard 96-well plates using a robotic platform. In parallel shake flask cultivations, the respiration activity of the microorganisms was analyzed. Therefore, two online-monitoring systems were applied: the BioLector for microtiter plates and the RAMOS-device for shake flasks. The impact of different induction conditions on biomass and product formation as well as on the oxygen transfer rate was surveyed. RESULTS: Different optimal induction conditions were obtained for temperatures of 28, 30, 34, and 37 °C. The best inducer concentrations were determined to be between 0.05 and 0.1 mM IPTG for all investigated temperatures. This is 10–20 times lower than conventional guidelines suggest. The induction time was less relevant when the correct inducer concentration was chosen. Furthermore, there was a stronger impact on growth and respiration activity at higher temperatures. This indicated a higher metabolic burden. Therefore, lower IPTG concentrations were advantageous at elevated temperatures. Very similar results were obtained in standard 96-well plates. CONCLUSION: Two online-monitoring systems were successfully used to investigate the optimal induction conditions for the E. coli Tuner(DE3) pRhotHi-2-EcFbFP strain (lacY deletion mutant) at four different temperatures. The experimental effort was reduced to a minimum by integrating a liquid handling robot. To reach the maximum product formation, a detailed induction analysis was necessary. Whenever the cultivation temperature was changed, the induction conditions have to be adapted. Due to the experimental options provided by the BioLector technology, it was found that the higher the cultivation temperature, the lower the inducer concentration that has to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-017-0832-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5706349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57063492017-12-05 Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures Mühlmann, Martina Forsten, Eva Noack, Saskia Büchs, Jochen Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most abundant expression host for recombinant proteins. The production efficiency is dependent on a multitude of parameters. Therefore, high-throughput applications have become an increasingly frequent technique to investigate the main factors. Within this study, the effects of temperature, induction time and inducer concentration on the metabolic state and the product formation were extensively examined. Induction profiling of E. coli Tuner(DE3) pRhotHi-2-EcFbFP was performed in 48-well Flowerplates and standard 96-well plates using a robotic platform. In parallel shake flask cultivations, the respiration activity of the microorganisms was analyzed. Therefore, two online-monitoring systems were applied: the BioLector for microtiter plates and the RAMOS-device for shake flasks. The impact of different induction conditions on biomass and product formation as well as on the oxygen transfer rate was surveyed. RESULTS: Different optimal induction conditions were obtained for temperatures of 28, 30, 34, and 37 °C. The best inducer concentrations were determined to be between 0.05 and 0.1 mM IPTG for all investigated temperatures. This is 10–20 times lower than conventional guidelines suggest. The induction time was less relevant when the correct inducer concentration was chosen. Furthermore, there was a stronger impact on growth and respiration activity at higher temperatures. This indicated a higher metabolic burden. Therefore, lower IPTG concentrations were advantageous at elevated temperatures. Very similar results were obtained in standard 96-well plates. CONCLUSION: Two online-monitoring systems were successfully used to investigate the optimal induction conditions for the E. coli Tuner(DE3) pRhotHi-2-EcFbFP strain (lacY deletion mutant) at four different temperatures. The experimental effort was reduced to a minimum by integrating a liquid handling robot. To reach the maximum product formation, a detailed induction analysis was necessary. Whenever the cultivation temperature was changed, the induction conditions have to be adapted. Due to the experimental options provided by the BioLector technology, it was found that the higher the cultivation temperature, the lower the inducer concentration that has to be applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-017-0832-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5706349/ /pubmed/29183374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0832-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mühlmann, Martina
Forsten, Eva
Noack, Saskia
Büchs, Jochen
Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title_full Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title_fullStr Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title_short Optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
title_sort optimizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0832-4
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlmannmartina optimizingrecombinantproteinexpressionviaautomatedinductionprofilinginmicrotiterplatesatdifferenttemperatures
AT forsteneva optimizingrecombinantproteinexpressionviaautomatedinductionprofilinginmicrotiterplatesatdifferenttemperatures
AT noacksaskia optimizingrecombinantproteinexpressionviaautomatedinductionprofilinginmicrotiterplatesatdifferenttemperatures
AT buchsjochen optimizingrecombinantproteinexpressionviaautomatedinductionprofilinginmicrotiterplatesatdifferenttemperatures