Cargando…

Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation

BACKGROUND: Models that incorporate specific chemical mechanisms have been successful in describing the activity of Drosophila developmental enhancers as a function of underlying transcription factor binding motifs. Despite this, the minimum set of mechanisms required to reconstruct an enhancer from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barr, Kenneth A., Martinez, Carlos, Moran, Jennifer R., Kim, Ah-Ram, Ramos, Alexandre F., Reinitz, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0485-2
_version_ 1783282586890534912
author Barr, Kenneth A.
Martinez, Carlos
Moran, Jennifer R.
Kim, Ah-Ram
Ramos, Alexandre F.
Reinitz, John
author_facet Barr, Kenneth A.
Martinez, Carlos
Moran, Jennifer R.
Kim, Ah-Ram
Ramos, Alexandre F.
Reinitz, John
author_sort Barr, Kenneth A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Models that incorporate specific chemical mechanisms have been successful in describing the activity of Drosophila developmental enhancers as a function of underlying transcription factor binding motifs. Despite this, the minimum set of mechanisms required to reconstruct an enhancer from its constituent parts is not known. Synthetic biology offers the potential to test the sufficiency of known mechanisms to describe the activity of enhancers, as well as to uncover constraints on the number, order, and spacing of motifs. RESULTS: Using a functional model and in silico compensatory evolution, we generated putative synthetic even-skipped stripe 2 enhancers with varying degrees of similarity to the natural enhancer. These elements represent the evolutionary trajectories of the natural stripe 2 enhancer towards two synthetic enhancers designed ab initio. In the first trajectory, spatially regulated expression was maintained, even after more than a third of binding sites were lost. In the second, sequences with high similarity to the natural element did not drive expression, but a highly diverged sequence about half the length of the minimal stripe 2 enhancer drove ten times greater expression. Additionally, homotypic clusters of Zelda or Stat92E motifs, but not Bicoid, drove expression in developing embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present a functional model of gene regulation to test the degree to which the known transcription factors and their interactions explain the activity of the Drosophila even-skipped stripe 2 enhancer. Initial success in the first trajectory showed that the gene regulation model explains much of the function of the stripe 2 enhancer. Cases where expression deviated from prediction indicates that undescribed factors likely act to modulate expression. We also showed that activation driven Bicoid and Hunchback is highly sensitive to spatial organization of binding motifs. In contrast, Zelda and Stat92E drive expression from simple homotypic clusters, suggesting that activation driven by these factors is less constrained. Collectively, the 40 sequences generated in this work provides a powerful training set for building future models of gene regulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0485-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5708098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57080982017-12-06 Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation Barr, Kenneth A. Martinez, Carlos Moran, Jennifer R. Kim, Ah-Ram Ramos, Alexandre F. Reinitz, John BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Models that incorporate specific chemical mechanisms have been successful in describing the activity of Drosophila developmental enhancers as a function of underlying transcription factor binding motifs. Despite this, the minimum set of mechanisms required to reconstruct an enhancer from its constituent parts is not known. Synthetic biology offers the potential to test the sufficiency of known mechanisms to describe the activity of enhancers, as well as to uncover constraints on the number, order, and spacing of motifs. RESULTS: Using a functional model and in silico compensatory evolution, we generated putative synthetic even-skipped stripe 2 enhancers with varying degrees of similarity to the natural enhancer. These elements represent the evolutionary trajectories of the natural stripe 2 enhancer towards two synthetic enhancers designed ab initio. In the first trajectory, spatially regulated expression was maintained, even after more than a third of binding sites were lost. In the second, sequences with high similarity to the natural element did not drive expression, but a highly diverged sequence about half the length of the minimal stripe 2 enhancer drove ten times greater expression. Additionally, homotypic clusters of Zelda or Stat92E motifs, but not Bicoid, drove expression in developing embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present a functional model of gene regulation to test the degree to which the known transcription factors and their interactions explain the activity of the Drosophila even-skipped stripe 2 enhancer. Initial success in the first trajectory showed that the gene regulation model explains much of the function of the stripe 2 enhancer. Cases where expression deviated from prediction indicates that undescribed factors likely act to modulate expression. We also showed that activation driven Bicoid and Hunchback is highly sensitive to spatial organization of binding motifs. In contrast, Zelda and Stat92E drive expression from simple homotypic clusters, suggesting that activation driven by these factors is less constrained. Collectively, the 40 sequences generated in this work provides a powerful training set for building future models of gene regulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0485-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5708098/ /pubmed/29187214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0485-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barr, Kenneth A.
Martinez, Carlos
Moran, Jennifer R.
Kim, Ah-Ram
Ramos, Alexandre F.
Reinitz, John
Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title_full Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title_fullStr Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title_short Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
title_sort synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-017-0485-2
work_keys_str_mv AT barrkennetha syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation
AT martinezcarlos syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation
AT moranjenniferr syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation
AT kimahram syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation
AT ramosalexandref syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation
AT reinitzjohn syntheticenhancerdesignbyinsilicocompensatoryevolutionrevealsflexibilityandconstraintincisregulation