Cargando…

Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings

BACKGROUND: Epigenomes are tissue specific and thus the choice of surrogate tissue can play a critical role in interpreting neonatal epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and in their extrapolation to target tissue. To develop a better understanding of the link between tissue specificity and neo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Xinyi, Teh, Ai Ling, Chen, Li, Lim, Ives Yubin, Tan, Pei Fang, MacIsaac, Julia L., Morin, Alexander M., Yap, Fabian, Tan, Kok Hian, Saw, Seang Mei, Lee, Yung Seng, Holbrook, Joanna D., Godfrey, Keith M., Meaney, Michael J., Kobor, Michael S., Chong, Yap Seng, Gluckman, Peter D., Karnani, Neerja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x
_version_ 1783283778121105408
author Lin, Xinyi
Teh, Ai Ling
Chen, Li
Lim, Ives Yubin
Tan, Pei Fang
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Morin, Alexander M.
Yap, Fabian
Tan, Kok Hian
Saw, Seang Mei
Lee, Yung Seng
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Godfrey, Keith M.
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Karnani, Neerja
author_facet Lin, Xinyi
Teh, Ai Ling
Chen, Li
Lim, Ives Yubin
Tan, Pei Fang
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Morin, Alexander M.
Yap, Fabian
Tan, Kok Hian
Saw, Seang Mei
Lee, Yung Seng
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Godfrey, Keith M.
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Karnani, Neerja
author_sort Lin, Xinyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epigenomes are tissue specific and thus the choice of surrogate tissue can play a critical role in interpreting neonatal epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and in their extrapolation to target tissue. To develop a better understanding of the link between tissue specificity and neonatal EWAS, and the contributions of genotype and prenatal factors, we compared genome-wide DNA methylation of cord tissue and cord blood, two of the most accessible surrogate tissues at birth. METHODS: In 295 neonates, DNA methylation was profiled using Infinium HumanMethylation450 beadchip arrays. Sites of inter-individual variability in DNA methylation were mapped and compared across the two surrogate tissues at birth, i.e., cord tissue and cord blood. To ascertain the similarity to target tissues, DNA methylation profiles of surrogate tissues were compared to 25 primary tissues/cell types mapped under the Epigenome Roadmap project. Tissue-specific influences of genotype on the variable CpGs were also analyzed. Finally, to interrogate the impact of the in utero environment, EWAS on 45 prenatal factors were performed and compared across the surrogate tissues. RESULTS: Neonatal EWAS results were tissue specific. In comparison to cord blood, cord tissue showed higher inter-individual variability in the epigenome, with a lower proportion of CpGs influenced by genotype. Both neonatal tissues were good surrogates for target tissues of mesodermal origin. They also showed distinct phenotypic associations, with effect sizes of the overlapping CpGs being in the same order of magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-relationship between genetics, prenatal factors and epigenetics is tissue specific, and requires careful consideration in designing and interpreting future neonatal EWAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This birth cohort is a prospective observational study, designed to study the developmental origins of health and disease, and was retrospectively registered on 1 July 2010 under the identifier NCT01174875. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5715509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57155092017-12-08 Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings Lin, Xinyi Teh, Ai Ling Chen, Li Lim, Ives Yubin Tan, Pei Fang MacIsaac, Julia L. Morin, Alexander M. Yap, Fabian Tan, Kok Hian Saw, Seang Mei Lee, Yung Seng Holbrook, Joanna D. Godfrey, Keith M. Meaney, Michael J. Kobor, Michael S. Chong, Yap Seng Gluckman, Peter D. Karnani, Neerja BMC Med Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Epigenomes are tissue specific and thus the choice of surrogate tissue can play a critical role in interpreting neonatal epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and in their extrapolation to target tissue. To develop a better understanding of the link between tissue specificity and neonatal EWAS, and the contributions of genotype and prenatal factors, we compared genome-wide DNA methylation of cord tissue and cord blood, two of the most accessible surrogate tissues at birth. METHODS: In 295 neonates, DNA methylation was profiled using Infinium HumanMethylation450 beadchip arrays. Sites of inter-individual variability in DNA methylation were mapped and compared across the two surrogate tissues at birth, i.e., cord tissue and cord blood. To ascertain the similarity to target tissues, DNA methylation profiles of surrogate tissues were compared to 25 primary tissues/cell types mapped under the Epigenome Roadmap project. Tissue-specific influences of genotype on the variable CpGs were also analyzed. Finally, to interrogate the impact of the in utero environment, EWAS on 45 prenatal factors were performed and compared across the surrogate tissues. RESULTS: Neonatal EWAS results were tissue specific. In comparison to cord blood, cord tissue showed higher inter-individual variability in the epigenome, with a lower proportion of CpGs influenced by genotype. Both neonatal tissues were good surrogates for target tissues of mesodermal origin. They also showed distinct phenotypic associations, with effect sizes of the overlapping CpGs being in the same order of magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-relationship between genetics, prenatal factors and epigenetics is tissue specific, and requires careful consideration in designing and interpreting future neonatal EWAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This birth cohort is a prospective observational study, designed to study the developmental origins of health and disease, and was retrospectively registered on 1 July 2010 under the identifier NCT01174875. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5715509/ /pubmed/29202839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Lin, Xinyi
Teh, Ai Ling
Chen, Li
Lim, Ives Yubin
Tan, Pei Fang
MacIsaac, Julia L.
Morin, Alexander M.
Yap, Fabian
Tan, Kok Hian
Saw, Seang Mei
Lee, Yung Seng
Holbrook, Joanna D.
Godfrey, Keith M.
Meaney, Michael J.
Kobor, Michael S.
Chong, Yap Seng
Gluckman, Peter D.
Karnani, Neerja
Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title_full Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title_fullStr Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title_full_unstemmed Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title_short Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
title_sort choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal ewas findings
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29202839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x
work_keys_str_mv AT linxinyi choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT tehailing choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT chenli choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT limivesyubin choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT tanpeifang choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT macisaacjulial choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT morinalexanderm choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT yapfabian choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT tankokhian choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT sawseangmei choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT leeyungseng choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT holbrookjoannad choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT godfreykeithm choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT meaneymichaelj choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT kobormichaels choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT chongyapseng choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT gluckmanpeterd choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings
AT karnanineerja choiceofsurrogatetissueinfluencesneonatalewasfindings