Cargando…

Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.

Intermittent catheterisation is the preferred method of managing the neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injury. However, spinal cord physicians experienced problems when trying to implement an intermittent catheterisation regime in some spinal cord injury patients in the northwest of En...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaidyanathan, Subramanian, Soni, Bakul M., Singh, Gurpreet, Oo, Tun, Hughes, Peter L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21218264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.12
_version_ 1783284617348907008
author Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bakul M.
Singh, Gurpreet
Oo, Tun
Hughes, Peter L.
author_facet Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bakul M.
Singh, Gurpreet
Oo, Tun
Hughes, Peter L.
author_sort Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
collection PubMed
description Intermittent catheterisation is the preferred method of managing the neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injury. However, spinal cord physicians experienced problems when trying to implement an intermittent catheterisation regime in some spinal cord injury patients in the northwest of England. We present illustrative cases to describe practical difficulties encountered by patients while trying to adopt an intermittent catheterisation regime. Barriers to intermittent catheterisation are (1) caregivers or nurses are not available to carry out five or six catheterisations a day; (2) lack of time to perform intermittent catheterisations; (3) unavailability of suitable toilet facilities in public places, including restaurants and offices; (4) redundant prepuce in a male patient, which prevents ready access to urethral meatus; (5) urethral false passage; (6) urethral sphincter spasm requiring the use of flexible-tip catheters and α-drenoceptor–blocking drugs; (7) reluctance to perform intermittent catheterisation in patients >60 years by some health professionals; and (8) difficulty in accessing the urethral meatus for catheterisation while the patient is sitting up, especially in female patients. These cases demonstrate the urgent need for provision of trained caregivers who can perform intermittent catheterisation, and improvement in public facilities that are suitable for performing catheterisation in spinal cord injury patients. Further, vigilance should be exercised during each catheterisation in order to prevent complications, such as urethral trauma and consequent false passages. Health professionals should make additional efforts to implement intermittent catheterisation in female spinal cord injury patients and in those >60 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5720088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57200882017-12-21 Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K. Vaidyanathan, Subramanian Soni, Bakul M. Singh, Gurpreet Oo, Tun Hughes, Peter L. ScientificWorldJournal Case Series Intermittent catheterisation is the preferred method of managing the neurogenic bladder in patients with spinal cord injury. However, spinal cord physicians experienced problems when trying to implement an intermittent catheterisation regime in some spinal cord injury patients in the northwest of England. We present illustrative cases to describe practical difficulties encountered by patients while trying to adopt an intermittent catheterisation regime. Barriers to intermittent catheterisation are (1) caregivers or nurses are not available to carry out five or six catheterisations a day; (2) lack of time to perform intermittent catheterisations; (3) unavailability of suitable toilet facilities in public places, including restaurants and offices; (4) redundant prepuce in a male patient, which prevents ready access to urethral meatus; (5) urethral false passage; (6) urethral sphincter spasm requiring the use of flexible-tip catheters and α-drenoceptor–blocking drugs; (7) reluctance to perform intermittent catheterisation in patients >60 years by some health professionals; and (8) difficulty in accessing the urethral meatus for catheterisation while the patient is sitting up, especially in female patients. These cases demonstrate the urgent need for provision of trained caregivers who can perform intermittent catheterisation, and improvement in public facilities that are suitable for performing catheterisation in spinal cord injury patients. Further, vigilance should be exercised during each catheterisation in order to prevent complications, such as urethral trauma and consequent false passages. Health professionals should make additional efforts to implement intermittent catheterisation in female spinal cord injury patients and in those >60 years. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5720088/ /pubmed/21218264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.12 Text en Copyright © 2011 Subramanian Vaidyanathan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Vaidyanathan, Subramanian
Soni, Bakul M.
Singh, Gurpreet
Oo, Tun
Hughes, Peter L.
Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title_full Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title_fullStr Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title_short Barriers to Implementing Intermittent Catheterisation in Spinal Cord Injury Patients in Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, U.K.
title_sort barriers to implementing intermittent catheterisation in spinal cord injury patients in northwest regional spinal injuries centre, southport, u.k.
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21218264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.12
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidyanathansubramanian barrierstoimplementingintermittentcatheterisationinspinalcordinjurypatientsinnorthwestregionalspinalinjuriescentresouthportuk
AT sonibakulm barrierstoimplementingintermittentcatheterisationinspinalcordinjurypatientsinnorthwestregionalspinalinjuriescentresouthportuk
AT singhgurpreet barrierstoimplementingintermittentcatheterisationinspinalcordinjurypatientsinnorthwestregionalspinalinjuriescentresouthportuk
AT ootun barrierstoimplementingintermittentcatheterisationinspinalcordinjurypatientsinnorthwestregionalspinalinjuriescentresouthportuk
AT hughespeterl barrierstoimplementingintermittentcatheterisationinspinalcordinjurypatientsinnorthwestregionalspinalinjuriescentresouthportuk