Cargando…

Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre

OBJECTIVES: Patient satisfaction impacts healthcare quality and outcomes. Residents play an important role in patient satisfaction at academic institutions. This study aims to assess residents’ patient satisfaction knowledge and determine which learning experiences contributed to their knowledge acq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stewart, Diana E, Dang, Bich N, Trautner, Barbara, Cai, Cecilia, Torres, Sergio, Turner, Teri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017100
_version_ 1783285319819329536
author Stewart, Diana E
Dang, Bich N
Trautner, Barbara
Cai, Cecilia
Torres, Sergio
Turner, Teri
author_facet Stewart, Diana E
Dang, Bich N
Trautner, Barbara
Cai, Cecilia
Torres, Sergio
Turner, Teri
author_sort Stewart, Diana E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient satisfaction impacts healthcare quality and outcomes. Residents play an important role in patient satisfaction at academic institutions. This study aims to assess residents’ patient satisfaction knowledge and determine which learning experiences contributed to their knowledge acquisition. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a health science university in a large, urban, tertiary-care academic medical centre in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All residents from internal medicine (n=185) and paediatrics (n=156) were asked to participate. DESIGN: Residents completed a survey from April 2013 to December 2013 that assessed (1) knowledge of factors that impact patient satisfaction and (2) learning experiences that may have contributed to their understanding of the drivers of patient satisfaction (eg, experiential (personal or clinical) or didactics). Trainees identified the importance of factors in determining patient satisfaction on a five-point Likert scale; answers were compiled into a knowledge score. The score was correlated with prior personal/clinical experience and didactics. RESULTS: Of the 341 residents, 247 (72%) completed the survey. No difference was found in knowledge among training levels or residency programme. More than 50% incorrectly thought physician board certification, patient’s education, patient’s income and physician’s age impacted satisfaction. Personal experience, through hospitalisation of a relative or friend, was correlated with higher knowledge (67% vs 71%, p=0.03). Ninety-nine per cent (n=238) stated peer observation, and all stated faculty feedback impacted their patient satisfaction knowledge. Seventy-seven per cent (n=185) had attended didactics on satisfaction, but attendance did not correlate with higher scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed trainees have a few gaps in their patient satisfaction knowledge, and attending past educational sessions on patient satisfaction did not correlate with higher knowledge scores. Our data suggest that academic centres should leverage residents’ personal experiences, their observations of peers and faculty feedback to enhance patient satisfaction knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5724205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57242052017-12-19 Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre Stewart, Diana E Dang, Bich N Trautner, Barbara Cai, Cecilia Torres, Sergio Turner, Teri BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: Patient satisfaction impacts healthcare quality and outcomes. Residents play an important role in patient satisfaction at academic institutions. This study aims to assess residents’ patient satisfaction knowledge and determine which learning experiences contributed to their knowledge acquisition. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a health science university in a large, urban, tertiary-care academic medical centre in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All residents from internal medicine (n=185) and paediatrics (n=156) were asked to participate. DESIGN: Residents completed a survey from April 2013 to December 2013 that assessed (1) knowledge of factors that impact patient satisfaction and (2) learning experiences that may have contributed to their understanding of the drivers of patient satisfaction (eg, experiential (personal or clinical) or didactics). Trainees identified the importance of factors in determining patient satisfaction on a five-point Likert scale; answers were compiled into a knowledge score. The score was correlated with prior personal/clinical experience and didactics. RESULTS: Of the 341 residents, 247 (72%) completed the survey. No difference was found in knowledge among training levels or residency programme. More than 50% incorrectly thought physician board certification, patient’s education, patient’s income and physician’s age impacted satisfaction. Personal experience, through hospitalisation of a relative or friend, was correlated with higher knowledge (67% vs 71%, p=0.03). Ninety-nine per cent (n=238) stated peer observation, and all stated faculty feedback impacted their patient satisfaction knowledge. Seventy-seven per cent (n=185) had attended didactics on satisfaction, but attendance did not correlate with higher scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed trainees have a few gaps in their patient satisfaction knowledge, and attending past educational sessions on patient satisfaction did not correlate with higher knowledge scores. Our data suggest that academic centres should leverage residents’ personal experiences, their observations of peers and faculty feedback to enhance patient satisfaction knowledge. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5724205/ /pubmed/28827266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017100 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Stewart, Diana E
Dang, Bich N
Trautner, Barbara
Cai, Cecilia
Torres, Sergio
Turner, Teri
Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title_full Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title_fullStr Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title_full_unstemmed Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title_short Assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
title_sort assessing residents’ knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28827266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017100
work_keys_str_mv AT stewartdianae assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre
AT dangbichn assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre
AT trautnerbarbara assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre
AT caicecilia assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre
AT torressergio assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre
AT turnerteri assessingresidentsknowledgeofpatientsatisfactionacrosssectionalstudyatalargeacademicmedicalcentre