Cargando…

Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serrano-Muñoz, Diego, Gómez-Soriano, Julio, Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth, Vázquez-Fariñas, María, Taylor, Julian, Avendaño-Coy, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734
_version_ 1783286546741329920
author Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
Gómez-Soriano, Julio
Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth
Vázquez-Fariñas, María
Taylor, Julian
Avendaño-Coy, Juan
author_facet Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
Gómez-Soriano, Julio
Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth
Vázquez-Fariñas, María
Taylor, Julian
Avendaño-Coy, Juan
author_sort Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
collection PubMed
description The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determine the difference in the effect of spinal TENS on soleus H-reflex modulation when applied by two therapists instructed to apply the stimulation at a “strong but comfortable” intensity. Twenty healthy volunteers divided into two groups: Therapist 1 (n = 10) and Therapist 2 (n = 10). Both therapist applied spinal TENS and sham stimulation at the T10–12 spinal level for 40min in random order to each subject, at an intensity designed to produce a “strong but comfortable” sensation. To avoid habituation, the intensity was adjusted every 2min. Soleus H-reflex was recorded before, during, and 10min after TENS by an observer blinded to the stimulus applied. Despite the instruction to apply TENS at a “strong comfortable” level, a significant difference in current density was identified: Therapist 1 (0.67mA/cm(2), SD 0.54) applied more than Therapist 2 (0.53mA/cm(2), SD 0.57; p<0.001) at the onset of the intervention. Maximal peak-to-peak H-reflex amplitude was inhibited significantly more 10min following TENS applied by Therapist 1 (-0.15mV, SD 0.16) compared with Therapist 2 (0.04mV, SD 0.16; p = 0.03). Furthermore, current density significantly correlated with the inhibitory effect on peak-to-peak Soleus H-reflex amplitude 10 min after stimulation (Rho = -0.38; p = 0.04). TENS intensity dosage by the therapist based on the subjective perception of the participants alone is unreliable and requires objective standardization. In addition, higher current density TENS produced greater inhibition of the Soleus H-reflex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5731687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57316872017-12-22 Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Vázquez-Fariñas, María Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan PLoS One Research Article The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determine the difference in the effect of spinal TENS on soleus H-reflex modulation when applied by two therapists instructed to apply the stimulation at a “strong but comfortable” intensity. Twenty healthy volunteers divided into two groups: Therapist 1 (n = 10) and Therapist 2 (n = 10). Both therapist applied spinal TENS and sham stimulation at the T10–12 spinal level for 40min in random order to each subject, at an intensity designed to produce a “strong but comfortable” sensation. To avoid habituation, the intensity was adjusted every 2min. Soleus H-reflex was recorded before, during, and 10min after TENS by an observer blinded to the stimulus applied. Despite the instruction to apply TENS at a “strong comfortable” level, a significant difference in current density was identified: Therapist 1 (0.67mA/cm(2), SD 0.54) applied more than Therapist 2 (0.53mA/cm(2), SD 0.57; p<0.001) at the onset of the intervention. Maximal peak-to-peak H-reflex amplitude was inhibited significantly more 10min following TENS applied by Therapist 1 (-0.15mV, SD 0.16) compared with Therapist 2 (0.04mV, SD 0.16; p = 0.03). Furthermore, current density significantly correlated with the inhibitory effect on peak-to-peak Soleus H-reflex amplitude 10 min after stimulation (Rho = -0.38; p = 0.04). TENS intensity dosage by the therapist based on the subjective perception of the participants alone is unreliable and requires objective standardization. In addition, higher current density TENS produced greater inhibition of the Soleus H-reflex. Public Library of Science 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5731687/ /pubmed/29244850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734 Text en © 2017 Serrano-Muñoz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Serrano-Muñoz, Diego
Gómez-Soriano, Julio
Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth
Vázquez-Fariñas, María
Taylor, Julian
Avendaño-Coy, Juan
Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_full Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_fullStr Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_short Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
title_sort intensity matters: therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734
work_keys_str_mv AT serranomunozdiego intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT gomezsorianojulio intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT bravoestebanelisabeth intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT vazquezfarinasmaria intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT taylorjulian intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation
AT avendanocoyjuan intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation