Cargando…
Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734 |
_version_ | 1783286546741329920 |
---|---|
author | Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Vázquez-Fariñas, María Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan |
author_facet | Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Vázquez-Fariñas, María Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan |
author_sort | Serrano-Muñoz, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determine the difference in the effect of spinal TENS on soleus H-reflex modulation when applied by two therapists instructed to apply the stimulation at a “strong but comfortable” intensity. Twenty healthy volunteers divided into two groups: Therapist 1 (n = 10) and Therapist 2 (n = 10). Both therapist applied spinal TENS and sham stimulation at the T10–12 spinal level for 40min in random order to each subject, at an intensity designed to produce a “strong but comfortable” sensation. To avoid habituation, the intensity was adjusted every 2min. Soleus H-reflex was recorded before, during, and 10min after TENS by an observer blinded to the stimulus applied. Despite the instruction to apply TENS at a “strong comfortable” level, a significant difference in current density was identified: Therapist 1 (0.67mA/cm(2), SD 0.54) applied more than Therapist 2 (0.53mA/cm(2), SD 0.57; p<0.001) at the onset of the intervention. Maximal peak-to-peak H-reflex amplitude was inhibited significantly more 10min following TENS applied by Therapist 1 (-0.15mV, SD 0.16) compared with Therapist 2 (0.04mV, SD 0.16; p = 0.03). Furthermore, current density significantly correlated with the inhibitory effect on peak-to-peak Soleus H-reflex amplitude 10 min after stimulation (Rho = -0.38; p = 0.04). TENS intensity dosage by the therapist based on the subjective perception of the participants alone is unreliable and requires objective standardization. In addition, higher current density TENS produced greater inhibition of the Soleus H-reflex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5731687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57316872017-12-22 Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Vázquez-Fariñas, María Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan PLoS One Research Article The intensity used during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in both, clinical practice and research studies, is often based on subjective commands such as “strong but comfortable sensation”. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness dose of TENS. The objective was to determine the difference in the effect of spinal TENS on soleus H-reflex modulation when applied by two therapists instructed to apply the stimulation at a “strong but comfortable” intensity. Twenty healthy volunteers divided into two groups: Therapist 1 (n = 10) and Therapist 2 (n = 10). Both therapist applied spinal TENS and sham stimulation at the T10–12 spinal level for 40min in random order to each subject, at an intensity designed to produce a “strong but comfortable” sensation. To avoid habituation, the intensity was adjusted every 2min. Soleus H-reflex was recorded before, during, and 10min after TENS by an observer blinded to the stimulus applied. Despite the instruction to apply TENS at a “strong comfortable” level, a significant difference in current density was identified: Therapist 1 (0.67mA/cm(2), SD 0.54) applied more than Therapist 2 (0.53mA/cm(2), SD 0.57; p<0.001) at the onset of the intervention. Maximal peak-to-peak H-reflex amplitude was inhibited significantly more 10min following TENS applied by Therapist 1 (-0.15mV, SD 0.16) compared with Therapist 2 (0.04mV, SD 0.16; p = 0.03). Furthermore, current density significantly correlated with the inhibitory effect on peak-to-peak Soleus H-reflex amplitude 10 min after stimulation (Rho = -0.38; p = 0.04). TENS intensity dosage by the therapist based on the subjective perception of the participants alone is unreliable and requires objective standardization. In addition, higher current density TENS produced greater inhibition of the Soleus H-reflex. Public Library of Science 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5731687/ /pubmed/29244850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734 Text en © 2017 Serrano-Muñoz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Gómez-Soriano, Julio Bravo-Esteban, Elisabeth Vázquez-Fariñas, María Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title | Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_full | Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_fullStr | Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_short | Intensity matters: Therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
title_sort | intensity matters: therapist-dependent dose of spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serranomunozdiego intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT gomezsorianojulio intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT bravoestebanelisabeth intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT vazquezfarinasmaria intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT taylorjulian intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation AT avendanocoyjuan intensitymatterstherapistdependentdoseofspinaltranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulation |