Cargando…
Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams
INTRODUCTION: Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146021 |
_version_ | 1783286970725695488 |
---|---|
author | Bank, Lindsay Jippes, Mariëlle Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert JJA den Rooyen, Corry van Luijk, Scheltus J Scheele, Fedde |
author_facet | Bank, Lindsay Jippes, Mariëlle Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert JJA den Rooyen, Corry van Luijk, Scheltus J Scheele, Fedde |
author_sort | Bank, Lindsay |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores whether assessing ORC in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME. METHODS: Clinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Netherlands were requested to complete the Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change, a questionnaire to measure ORC in clinical teaching teams. In addition, change-related behavior was measured by using the “behavioral support-for-change” measure. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for all response variables of interest. RESULTS: In total, 836 clinical teaching team members were included in this study: 288 (34.4%) trainees, 307 (36.7%) clinical staff members, and 241 (28.8%) program directors. Overall, items regarding whether the program director has the authority to lead scored higher compared with the other items. At the other end, the subscales “management support and leadership,” “project resources,” and “implementation plan” had the lowest scores in all groups. DISCUSSION: The study brought to light that program directors are clearly in the lead when it comes to the implementation of educational innovation. Clinical teaching teams tend to work together as a team, sharing responsibilities in the implementation process. However, the results also reinforce the need for change management support in change processes in PGME. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5733925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57339252017-12-22 Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams Bank, Lindsay Jippes, Mariëlle Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert JJA den Rooyen, Corry van Luijk, Scheltus J Scheele, Fedde Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research INTRODUCTION: Curriculum change and innovation are inevitable parts of progress in postgraduate medical education (PGME). Although implementing change is known to be challenging, change management principles are rarely looked at for support. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for the successful implementation of change initiatives. Therefore, this study explores whether assessing ORC in clinical teaching teams could help to understand how curriculum change takes place in PGME. METHODS: Clinical teaching teams in hospitals in the Netherlands were requested to complete the Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change, a questionnaire to measure ORC in clinical teaching teams. In addition, change-related behavior was measured by using the “behavioral support-for-change” measure. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for all response variables of interest. RESULTS: In total, 836 clinical teaching team members were included in this study: 288 (34.4%) trainees, 307 (36.7%) clinical staff members, and 241 (28.8%) program directors. Overall, items regarding whether the program director has the authority to lead scored higher compared with the other items. At the other end, the subscales “management support and leadership,” “project resources,” and “implementation plan” had the lowest scores in all groups. DISCUSSION: The study brought to light that program directors are clearly in the lead when it comes to the implementation of educational innovation. Clinical teaching teams tend to work together as a team, sharing responsibilities in the implementation process. However, the results also reinforce the need for change management support in change processes in PGME. Dove Medical Press 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5733925/ /pubmed/29276424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146021 Text en © 2017 Bank et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bank, Lindsay Jippes, Mariëlle Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert JJA den Rooyen, Corry van Luijk, Scheltus J Scheele, Fedde Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title | Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title_full | Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title_fullStr | Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title_full_unstemmed | Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title_short | Are they ready? Organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
title_sort | are they ready? organizational readiness for change among clinical teaching teams |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29276424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banklindsay aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT jippesmarielle aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT leppinkjimmie aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT scherpbieralbertjja aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT denrooyencorry aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT vanluijkscheltusj aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams AT scheelefedde aretheyreadyorganizationalreadinessforchangeamongclinicalteachingteams |